Hot takes

➔ The IEA has tempered Canada’s renewable energy growth forecast. The International Energy Agency’s latest report still expects Canada to add 21 gigawatts of renewable energy capacity by 2030, almost double the growth of the previous six years, mainly in onshore wind and utility-scale solar PV. However, that’s an 11% decline from the IEA forecast from last year. Ongoing grid challenges and policy and regulatory changes in Alberta were among the key reasons for the IEA pulling back its forecast. It’s a major reversal elsewhere too, with the U.S. and China—the world’s two largest renewable energy markets—facing slower growth amid policy shifts, supply chain vulnerabilities and financing pressures.

➔ Can Canada attract H1-B visa types that are no longer welcome in the U.S. For all the talk of Canada capitalizing on U.S.’s visa snarls to attract the world’s brightest and smartest comes a sobering stat: it takes 53 months for Canada to issue a Start-Up Visa (SUV). A new Betakit study shows that the decade-old program has been facing several challenges, while the government has also slowed the process as part of a wider immigration slowdown. Getting some of the world’s smartest climate, cleantech and innovative minds would require some quick thinking—and processing—from policymakers.

➔ David Greybeard made Jane Goodall. The chimpanzee, with the silver facial hair, was the first animal conservationist Goodall saw using tools and eating meat—sparking a lifelong quest by the conservationist in her pursuit of a greener and richly-biodiverse Earth. She anthropomorphized animals (pointedly rejecting the established practice of using numbers to identify animals by naming Greybeard and his family). By making it personal, Goodall—who died last week, aged 91—lifted them up and, through the Goodall Institute saved countless (though not nameless) species. Goodall was ahead of the curve, but her focus on nature is finally gaining traction.

➔ Further reading: Unearthing Value: How nature can play a critical role in pro-growth agendas – RBC

Cultivating the next generation of Ag innovators

Canada’s agriculture sector has all the ingredients to be the best in the world—productive soils, temperate climate, advanced on-farm mechanization, and a growing agri-food manufacturing sector. But capitalizing on the moment, won’t be easy, according to a new RBC Thought Leadership report . The sector has struggled to attract the right mix of talent and maintain the level of investment in R&D that is required to remain a global leader.

Research by Lisa Ashton, Director of Agriculture Policy, highlights the scale of the challenge:

• Canadian agriculture has immense potential, but the innovation curve may be slowing down. Canada is home to some of the world’s most productive soils and innovative farmers. But agriculture’s annual growth in productivity has declined to about 1% over the past decade from 2% the previous decade, suggesting that few breakthrough innovations are making it to farms.

• The sector is not attracting enough talent. Job vacancy rates are 1.5% above the national average. Less than 1% of STEM and business graduates, who play increasingly important roles on the modern farm, are choosing occupations in agriculture.

• The research and development system is becoming less diverse. Public investment in agriculture knowledge generation, which includes R&D, has declined by 15% since 2010. Private sector outsourced R&D to universities is down 77% over the past five years. And the number of enterprises conducting R&D in the past decade has shrunk by 29%.

• Other countries are pulling ahead. Canada has fallen behind Australia, the U.S., Japan, and Brazil in public investment in agriculture knowledge generation. Home-grown agriculture commercialization is in a slump as the country’s trade balances grow in innovation areas including agriculture chemicals, fertilizers, and services.

• Commercialization of agriculture solutions are headed south. Investment in American agri-food technology startups has been 22 times larger than Canada’s over the past 5 years. The outsized market for investment in the U.S. is pulling Canadian innovation south for capital, mentorship, and market application.

To address the agriculture skills gap, RBC launched an investment initiative in Winnipeg today to help cultivate the next generation of Canadian farming. Introduced alongside Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew, RBC Generate was launched with a $5 million, five-year investment in agriculture in the Prairies with plans to expand through programming delivered as part of a national movement with farmers, The Canadian Alliance for Net-Zero Agri-food (CANZA) Nature United, Sustainable Food Systems for Canada (SF4C) and Indigenous sustainable farming initiatives.

NUCLEAR

SMRs: Small but mighty

RBC Thought Leadership’s Vivan Sorab moderated a panel on Tripling Nuclear Power by 2050: The Role of SMRs in Achieving Global Energy Goals at the SMR Forum in Edmonton last week.

Joined by Atkins Realis Carl Marcotte, Terrestrial Energy’s William (Bill) Smith, GE Vernova Hitachi Nuclear Energy’s Lisa McBride, and George Christidis from the Canadian Nuclear Association, the panel explored the role of SMRs and Canada’s advantages. Here are some of the key takeaways:

• Collaboration is Canada’s competitive advantage: Ontario has taken the lead, commencing construction of the G7’s first grid scale SMR, and has brought together government, utilities, the Canadian nuclear supply chain, and academics to build Canada’s first new nuclear plant in 3 decades. As provinces outside of Canada’s existing nuclear provinces consider nuclear for the first time, building on this collaboration will be key to success.

• Canada must seize the opportunity: With initiatives like Canada’s SMR Roadmap and first-mover advantage on SMR construction, Canada has positioned itself as a leader in next-generation nuclear. But with competition from the U.S. and other countries heating up, Canada must act fast to maintain its lead and ensure that its SMR expertise enables energy security and decarbonization globally. More synergy between the federal and provincial governments will be critical.

• Investment must grow: Canada’s future nuclear fleet will need new investment to sustain a growing supply chain, a next-generation workforce, and the skilled tradespeople needed to build new reactors.

• SMRs have a big price tag. The Ontario Power Generation’s four SMRs at Darlington with a capacity of 300-magawatt are expected to cost $20.9 billion. That compares to the 377-megawatt natural gas-fired power station in Saskatchewan carrying a price tag of $825 million. While SMRs can have geostrategic value, they will still need to compete with gas, hydro and bigger nuclear plants to attract capital.

• Indigenous communities are front and centre: New nuclear projects will not succeed without placing indigenous communities at the forefront. Engagement must be early and projects must enable indigenous participation and equity.

➔ New York Climate Week shrugs off U.S. climate retreat

➔ Nova Scotia is going big on wind power

➔ Our Unearthing Value report explores natural capital’s role in pro-growth agendas

Hot takes

➔ New York Climate Week powers on despite clouds over clean energy. The annual event, underway this week, is featuring more than 1,000 sessions across the city, from Arctic to sustainable fashion, adaptation to critical minerals. The event comes amid a major reversal by Washington on several clean energy policies. But the record number of programs and more than 100,000 attendees suggest the push for a greener and cleaner energy transition may not have waned just yet.

➔ Nova Scotia’s Wind West proposal is gaining momentum. The province’s proposed $60-billion, 5,000-megawatt development could position Atlantic Canada as a clean energy hub. Ottawa also believes the proposal is a major projects contender, and is gauging investor interest that could spur renewable power expansion on the East Coast. But, as the strategic plan itself states, “it won’t be easy,” with regulatory challenges and cost competitiveness issues to overcome. Nova Scotia is seeking federal support through investment tax credits and low-interest loans from the Canada Infrastructure Bank and support for the Mi’kmaq Nation to purchase equity in the project. The slew of support measures could lower the project costs to $170 per megawatt hour, compared to the average energy rate of $51.86 per megawatt hour Nova Scotians paid last year.

➔ Australia is pitching itself as a carbon storage hub. Take note, Canada. The nation Down Under is leveraging its geological advantages to become a carbon storage hub for Asia-Pacific. It’s part of Australia’s new Net Zero plan, out last week, that pledges to cut carbon emissions by at least 62% compared to 2005 levels over the next decade. The focus on carbon removal and investment in the technology aims to offset the country’s gas and mining emissions.

A climate policy reset

Mark Carney’s forthcoming “Carbon Competitiveness Strategy” is an interesting combination of words. Unlike Trudeau-era climate policy labels that centred on carbon reduction—such as “Emissions Reduction Plan” and “Oil & Gas Emissions Cap”—the current Prime Minister’s word choice signals a marked shift on how carbon (its reduction, storage and low-emissions production) can advance Canada’s economy.

As Canada recalibrates its climate policies, here are five questions we are thinking about:

• What’s the future of the industrial carbon pricing system? Alberta’s freeze on its industrial carbon tax price for 2026 and Saskatchewan’s earlier repeal challenges federal rules. Carney will need to clarify how federal design can sustain investment on clean technologies while managing provincial divergence.

• How should a Border Carbon Adjustment be managed? Ottawa is weighing carbon tariffs to protect domestic industry from lower-cost, high-emitting imports. But with U.S. trade tensions simmering, its implementation may rankle Washington. As our economist Farhad Panahov wrote in a recent report: “Major discrepancies in carbon pricing with its trading partners can impact Canada’s competitiveness at a time of a structural global upheaval.” Is it even feasible? Could the BCA be a carveout focused on China and other non-NATO trading partners?

• What’s the future of the oil and gas emissions cap? Scrap, maintain or reimagine? A decision here could be critical for Canada’s energy sector.

• What will it take to revive clean-tech funding? Several investment tax credits are already in place. What else can Ottawa do to revive flagging funding in Canadian cleantech.

• Can we meet Paris targets? The Carney government says it remains committed to its 2030 climate goals. But the Canadian Climate Institute recently estimated that the country is off-track. What can Carney, a former UN Special Envoy on Climate Action and Finance, do to turn the trajectory around?

Clean tech and trends

➔ A new electric smart heat pump was rolled out in Canada. Vancouver-based startup Jetson’s Air can be plugged into existing ducts and operate in temperatures as low as -30C. An AI-powered energy manager analyzes weather, energy use, and indoor air quality to save energy—and money. CEO Stephen Lake, who led the smart glasses startup North that was acquired by Google in 2022, says it’s the software that will unlock efficiency gains. It could also be pivotal in making a dent in emissions: Heating emissions account for 13% of energy-related GHG emissions in Canada.

➔ A  McGill University lab spinoff secured $3.5 million from investors for a pilot project to build an iron-based energy storage. If successful, it could dramatically cut diesel and other fossil fuel consumption in heavy industry.

➔ European Union members failed to agree on a binding climate plan ahead of a UN general assembly meeting this week. They instead signed a “statement of intent” to cut emissions by as much as 72.5% by 2035.

➔ Robert Redford, who died last week, was not only a Hollywood icon, but also an activist with a knack of telling stories about a changing climate. His brainchild the Sundance Film Festival showcased several movies on the environment, while his non-profit Redford Centre backed 60 movies on climate action (or inaction), of which 11 were picked up by streaming services.

Nature

Unearthing value

More than $78 trillion  of the global economy—roughly half of total GDP—is highly to moderately dependent on nature. Yet, national GDPs count nature only after it is extracted—fish, grain, timber–while mostly ignoring ecosystem services from nature. In our new report, Director of Agriculture Policy Lisa Ashton, writes about how leveraging natural capital can boost pro-growth strategies.

LSome key takeaways from the report:

• Natural capital remains an underused economic engine. The GDP of Canada’s nature-based sectors, including forestry, agriculture, mining and fisheries, grew 0.3% slower, year-over-year, compared to the rest of the economy over the past quarter century. A similar trend is observed in the United States and the United Kingdom.

• Ignoring nature threatens prosperity. More than half of the world’s economy, roughly $78 trillion, depends on nature, from food to tourism to construction. Canada, the U.S. and the U.K. are looking to build back their economies, yet their nature base in which their economies rely on for long-term growth is depleting.

• There is a generational opportunity to leverage natural capital wealth through nation-building agendas. Countries that track and grow natural capital alongside GDP can unlock growth and attract global investors hunting for investable natural capital projects. With finance mobilizing to close the nature finance gap, demand is rising—and an estimated $580 billion is required annually by 2030 and it will be nearly $940 billion by 2050.

• Private capital is critical to scaling. And yet, governments currently account for 82% ($222 billion) of nature finance. That’s because the private sector needs stronger policy signals and assurance that their investments will generate returns to help close the gap.

• Nature’s place in finance and environmental markets is growing but remains underrepresented. Nature is a small segment of sustainability finance. In 2025, nature-based carbon offsets represent 13% of voluntary carbon credits to-date, but hold more than half of the annual potential of carbon credit creation.

• Policy integration, AI, and…yes, accounting can get nature on the balance sheet and growth agenda. For Canada, a timely test for all three is the implementation of the Critical Minerals Strategy and emerging major mining projects.Starting with integrating Indigenous values and knowledge systems in natural capital accounting frameworks.

The Institute in action

• Today, Lisa Ashton is presenting her report  Unearthing Value on the nature economy and moderating a panel with Nature United at the New York Climate Week.

• This week, the team hosted a delegation of U.S. congressional and embassy officials on the possibilities for enhanced cooperation between the U.S. and Canada on critical minerals.

➔ Nurturing nature at New York Climate Week

➔ The EV mandate is kicked down the road

➔ General Fusion’s new lease of life comes as global race heats up

Hot takes

➔ The Canada EV mandate is on hold. Another Trudeau-era climate policy suffered a blow when the Mark Carney government paused a rule that mandated automakers to ensure EVs accounted for 20% of sales from 2026. Trade headwinds from the U.S. are partly the reason as is the end of U.S. EV tax credits later this month. Automakers are already reeling from an estimated US$12-billion in tariff costs so far. Several are caught in limbo as they have sunk billions in EV supply chains on a market that’s suddenly lost momentum. It’s a microcosm of the bigger climate-versus-economy debate that’s raging around the world.

➔ The Business Development Bank of Canada is going big on critical minerals. The funding agency’s $200-million Industrial Innovation Venture Fund II, is supporting early-stage startups focused on several areas including key raw materials for clean-energy infrastructure and electric vehicles. Canada needs it: latest data from the Canadian Venture Capital Private Equity Association (CVCA) shows Canadian clean-tech firms raised a paltry $191 million in the first half of 2025, compared to $657 million during the same period last year.

➔ A new global oil rush. Norway likes to imagine itself as the land of the world’s richest—and most ESG-savvy—wealth fund and electric vehicles, but it’s all driven by fossil fuels. But Sylvi Listhaug, whose Progress Party surged to second place in the recently concluded elections, wants Norway to be the “last country in the world to stop (oil) production.” It’s a recurring theme, with Canada among scores of other countries catching the new oil fever. What would it mean for global emissions? Investments in upstream oil was set to fall this year for the first time since 2020, the IEA projects. It could just be a blip.

Dawn of a new Major Projects era

Dawn Farrell, the first head of the brand-new Major Projects Office (MPO), is tasked with fast-tracking several projects that could raise the country’s emissions—or not, depending on how she navigates the country’s twin environmental and economic imperatives. Could Farrell accomplish Canada’s elusive trifecta of building faster, accelerating sustainable growth, and strengthening national unity?

Her nearly decade-long tenure as CEO of Calgary-based utility giant TransAlta Corp., is instructive on how the executive has operated in the past:

• Under her watch, which ended in March 2021, the utility transitioned from coal to natural gas, as part of an industrywide transition to reduce emissions.

• By 2021, TransAlta had completed the full conversion of Keephills Unit 2, Keephills Unit 3 and Sundance Unit 6 from thermal coal to natural gas.

• The energy transition impacted coal workers, with several provincial communities tapping the Coal Community Transition Fund.

• By the end of 2021, TransAlta had cut GHG emissions by 70% from 2005 levels, and exceeded the national 2030 emissions targets in Canada, the U.S. and Australia where it operates.

• TransAlta transformed into one of the largest producers of wind power in Canada and the largest producer of hydro power in Alberta—growing renewable energy capacity from around 900 MW in 2000 to over 2,800 MW in 2021.

The TransAlta journey gives Farrell the cred to help streamline several projects, but now she must elevate it to a national level, where several competing interests—federal, provincial, First Nations and corporations—are jostling for attention.

Oil pipelines, LNG projects, and several renewable energy projects are being proposed, but here are Farrell’s overarching challenges:

• Bringing investor confidence back: The MPO will need to prove Canada can build again—and sustainably. The office will need some early wins to see global capital dip its toes back into Canada.

• Looking past Trump: Yes, there’s a POTUS-sized cloud hanging over Canada, but Europe (hello, Germany), Japan and emerging economies also want our resources. The next wave of projects will need to be pointing east and west, with buy-ins from consuming countries.

• Aligning provincial priorities: Another big rock. If Farrell can get B.C., Alberta and Quebec on the same page, Canada could become a resource superpower.

• Bringing Indigenous groups into the fold: Moving beyond lip service to actual partnerships with Indigenous communities could be the MPO’s most enduring achievements.

Trends, tech and science

➔ An ocean-based carbon removal tech is making waves. Nova Scotia-based Planetary Technologies recently struck a $43.3-million deal with Frontier Climate, which is backed by Shopify, Google, and Meta. The aim? Remove 115,211 metric tonnes of CO₂ between 2026 and 2030 by adding alkaline minerals—like calcium oxide and magnesium oxide—to coastal waters. The process accelerates natural absorption of CO2 and promises storage for over 10,000 years. Frontier believes it can bring the current price tag of roughly US$270 per tonne to US$50–$160 by leveraging existing infrastructure at coastal power plants. It will also preserve marine ecosystems and involve local communities, including the Mi’kmaq Nation.

➔ The dream is alive at General Fusion. The Richmond, B.C.-based, nuclear fusion hopeful recently raised $30 million, after recently enduring layoffs and scaled-back operations. The funds will power its LM26 fusion demonstration program, targeting operational temperatures of 10 million degrees Celsius—an essential step on the path to commercial fusion. Shopify CEO Tobi Lütke’s Thistledown Capital and Saudi JIMCO were among investors that backed the round. The lifeline for Canada’s sole fusion company comes as investors injected US$2.6 billion over the past year across 52 other companies globally, including 29 in the U.S. alone. And the race to crack the fusion tech code is heating up: China National Nuclear Corp. set up a $2-billion China Fusion Energy Co. in July, followed soon by Massachusetts-based Commonwealth Fusion Systems, the world’s largest private fusion company, raising US$863 million in a new round.

➔ Carbon capture is like trapping a genie in a bottle—but it could escape. A new peer-reviewed study published in Nature estimates that the world can trap a mere 1,460 gigatons of carbon dioxide-compared to previous estimates of as much as 40,000 Gt (roughly a year’s worth of CO2). Structural geological faults and poor well construction could dampen the efficacy of carbon-capture tech, the study notes. That still leaves plenty of jurisdictions with viable geology and expertise to capture carbon. Around US$4 billion has already been invested in carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) facilities in 2024 with more than 50 metric tonnes of CO2 capture capacity currently operational—with few leaks reported so far. In addition, the report identifies Canada and the U.S. as “better placed” than Europe to implement geologic storage solutions.

Nurturing nature in New York

Power On: Hard choices, real consequences. Sounds about right as the theme of this year’s New York Climate Week starting September 22. The event, which is fast rivalling the annual COP events, brings financiers, environmentalists and policy wonks together in one of the Big Apple’s worst traffic jam seasons.

Lisa Ashton, our Director of Agriculture Policy, will be in attendance. She will be speaking at the Nature Hub on September 24^th at an event co-hosted by the RBC Climate Action Institute and Nature United.

Nature contributes US$33 trillion to the global economy—equivalent to the value of global trade in goods and services. Yet, nature’s role in the economy beyond its extracted resources—fish, grain, and timber—are not accounted for in national GDPs, leaving a source of economic growth and risk on the sidelines. Here’s a sneak peak of some early themes emerging in Lisa’s upcoming report on the nature economy:

• Natural capital is underutilized as an asset in economic growth. The GDP of Canada’s nature-dependent sectors grew 0.6% slower, year-over-year, compared to the rest of the economy over the past quarter century.

• There are real risks in overlooking nature’s role in building prosperity. Canada, the U.S., and the U.K. are looking to build back their economies. Yet, their nature base is depleting. The U.K., for example, is stressing its water assets, with the government projecting a 5- billion-litre-per-day gap in water availability by 2055.

• Pro-growth agendas present opportunities to value and build natural capital. Nature is now a reportable risk and an investable asset class—ready to be integrated into major investment and infrastructure projects.

“In an era of reindustrialization, all opportunities for durable growth need to be on the table. A timely consideration as countries around the world are struggling to raise capital to manage, protect, and conserve their natural capital,” says Lisa.

RBC Briefings

• Carbon Pricing & Competitiveness: Steering Canada’s climate policies amid trade shocks

• Emissions, energy & economics: Canada’s latest mega project

• Building the Future: What to watch as Build Canada Homes takes shape

➔ Canada’s EV battery plan is supercharged

➔ The electric-jet era takes off at Billy Bishop airport

➔ How to unsettle scientists

Hot takes

➔ Canada’s EV battery vision takes shape. Volkswagen’s Canadian battery arm PowerCo is pushing ahead with its St. Thomas, Ontario, gigafactory, with two construction contracts. The plant is slated to start production in 2027. But it’s more than a construction milestone, it’s a signal that Canada’s high-stakes bet on EV supply chains is materializing despite tariff skirmishes and uncertain demand. For Ottawa and Ontario, the real test will be whether it can give Canada a foothold in North America’s evolving battery supply chain. 

➔ Energy ambitions clash with sustainability. Ontario’sproposal to connect Alberta and Saskatchewan oil and gas to refineries in Southern Ontario and tidewater ports, including a new deep-sea port on the James Bay coast, is facing Indigenous pushback. Their key concern: They feel “invisible.” The Indigenous Resource Network is also concerned they are seen as roadblocks to project development, when in fact “they are in fact part of the solution,” the IRN noted. This will be a recurring challenge as Canadian governments look to fast-track projects. Canada will need to get Indigenous groups on board to avoid project delays.

➔ Scientists are unsettled. The U.S. Department of Energy (DoE) stunned the climate academia world with a new report that suggested “CO2-induced warming might be less damaging economically than commonly believed.” Talk about unsettling the science community. Several websites including Nature and Carbon Brief have published pointed ripostes, but the new DoE report is challenging accepted wisdom on climate. Will the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) move swiftly with a rebuttal? Its next assessment report is not due till mid-2028.

Emissions, energy & economy: Assessing Canada’s latest mega project

Ksi Lisims LNG project is ready for its spotlight. The Indigenous-backed project is waiting for an environmental assessment (EA) order from the B.C. government that could potentially see the natural gas export project proceed. The province’s ministers of environment and parks and energy are set to decide by September 7.

Here’s how the project could impact Canada’s economy, emissions and energy:

Who’s behind it:  The Nisga’a Nation, a self-governing First Nation on the Pacific Coast. Western LNG, backed by an affiliate of investment heavyweight Blackstone Inc., is a partner.

Location: Right next to the U.S. border on Pearse Island.

Timelines: The EA was expected by Q4 2024, so we are already playing catchup. The original application placed construction between Q2 of 2025 to Q4 of 2027, with operations beginning in 2028 (till at least 2058).

Project description: Two floating LNG facilities, each with liquefaction processing units. Once fully complete, the project will handle up to two billion cubic feet per day (bcfd) and export around 12 million tonnes per annum of LNG.

Who’s opposing it: The project faces opposition from several environmental groups and Indigenous groups, including the Gitanyow Hereditary Chiefs and Lax Kw’alaams Band.

Related infrastructure: An environmental certificate has been issued for the 780-kilometre Prince Rupert Gas Transmission (PRGT) project, which Nisga’a and Western bought from TC Energy in 2024. If PRGT rings a bell, that’s because it was the key conduit for the now-defunct Malaysian energy giant Petronas’s LNG project proposal back in 2014. It was approved even then, with amendments in July to address new environmental concerns.

What about the project’s emissions: The development expects to be net-zero ready by 2030, subject to an electricity agreement with BC Hydro. Project proponents say it would contribute 0.02% of B.C.’s emissions and 0.002% of total Canadian emissions.

Is that good?: The project claims to have a lower well-to-port emissions intensity compared to U.S. Gulf Coast projects (0.76–1.19 tonne of carbon/tonne of LNG lower). At full production, Ksi Lisims LNG would emit 9–14 million tonnes less CO2e per year than a U.S. Gulf Coast terminal project.

Cool (your) jets

Is this the future of electric aviation?

RBC Thought Leadership’s Energy lead Shaz Merwat was on the Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport runway last week as Beta Technologies Alia CX300 rolled out an all-electric aircraft. The conventional takeoff/landing aircraft can be configured either as a passenger or cargo aircraft. Here are some cool specs:

• Passenger capacity: 5 passengers

• Cargo capacity: 1,250 lbs. of cargo

• Maximum demonstrated range: 336 nautical miles (i.e., Toronto to Sarnia, or Calgary to Okanagan region)

• Max speed: 280 km/hour (Cessna 172 can top 344 km/hour)

• Charge Time: <1 hour

• Energy cost: $18 per hour of flight time (Cessna 208: $347 per hour)

• Emissions: At least 75% less emissions than a conventional small aircraft

• Uses: Short-haul cargo and corporate travel

The CX300 photographed above is the cargo variant, and fourth off the production line with final delivery to Air New Zealand. The carrier will use the aircraft for regional cargo routes.

Billy Bishop is arguably already one of North America’s most sustainable airports, and is on a path to fully electrifying its vehicle fleet, including shuttle buses, ground vehicles, towing, etc.

To learn more about decarbonizing aviation, listen to the episode of RBC’s Disruptors Podcast on the topic with Angela Avery, Executive Vice President, Chief People, Corporate & Sustainability Officer at WestJet Group and Geoff Tauvette, Executive Director at the Canadian Council for Sustainable Aviation Fuels (C-SAF).

Trends, tech and science

Canada’s turning its chill into an advantage. Ottawa recently injected $2.5 million in TerraFixing’s direct air capture (DAC) tech—aimed at extracting CO₂ in remote, wintry zones where low temperatures actually enhance efficiency. It’s an inventive way to turn Canadian winters into an advantage. If TerraFixing can prove cold-weather DAC works at scale, it could give Canada an edge in the global carbon-capture arms race.

A new “cli-fi” take on extreme weather. Sarah Hall’s Helm, is the latest novel in the new climate fiction genre that blends “atmospheric principles” with folktales to paint a picture of humans’ relationship with nature. Meanwhile, eco-warrior Bill McKibben, who once wrote a book with the grim The End of Nature title, returns with a surprisingly upbeat Here Comes the Sun: A Last Chance for the Climate and a Fresh Chance for Civilization.

➔ The worried, the hopeless and the climate-conscious

➔ King Coal’s long rein continues

➔ A global gridlock’s holding back renewables

Hot takes

➔ Climate literacy for the worried and the hopeless. Ottawa plans to invest14.4 million in 17 projects to boost environmental literacy among young people. It ranges from $1.8 million for BC Parks Foundation to inform students about biodiversity loss and several programs that combine climate science with traditional Indigenous knowledge. We are going to need all of it: A recent study shows Canadian youth are wallowing in “worry and hopelessness” in response to climate change.

➔ Carbon Upcycling is a step closer to cracking the cement emissions challenge. The Calgary-based startup recently broke ground on Canada’s first commercial-scale carbon capture and utilization facility at partner Ash Grove’s Mississauga cement plant. Opening in 2026, the $10-millionproject will capture kiln CO₂ and convert it, along with other industrial byproducts, into up to 30,000 tonnes a year of low-carbon cement materials. Funded by federal programs and venture firm CRH Ventures, the initiative aims to embed circular economy solutions into heavy industry. Also read our 2024 case study on Carbon Upcycling.

➔ UN plastics treaty talks are on the brink. There was limited consensus among delegates of 179 nations after a 10-day marathon on global plastic pollution that ends today. The scale of the problem is massive, with straws, cups and stirrers, carrier bags and microbeads among the single-use products clogging up oceans and threatening marine life. The 2,000-plus delegates are poring over 32 clauses in a draft text, but, some say, countries can’t even agree on the definition of “plastic pollution.”

AI deepfakes’ power problems

Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe was the latest target of an AI deepfake video that falsely showed him promoting cryptocurrencies. It’s not just a public menace—it has implications for the climate.

Some AI models gobble up 20.4 million joules to generate a 30-second video, according to data extrapolated from an MIT study —that’s enough to power an electric vehicle for 18 kilometres. Eight million AI deepfakes could be shared online this year—doubling every six months, according to Open Fox, a law-enforcement consultancy. Add to it millions of meaningless, misleading and near-malicious AI-concocted videos that litter the Internet (countries as mythical monsters , anyone?). It’s not nothing: One 30-second video per day, for a month, would be the equivalent of adding 40% to a typical one-bedroom apartment’s utility bill, according to energy policy lead Shaz Merwat who wrote about AI’s power needs last year.

AI’s demand on power grids is already formidable:

➔ Datacentres will account for 20% of electricity demand growth to 2030 in advanced economies, the International Energy Agency estimates.

➔ Emissions from data centres could rise from 180 million tonnes today to 300 metric tonnes (Mt) by 2035 in IEA’s base case, with 500 Mt as a higher estimate—roughly 2.5x the emissions of Canada’s oil and gas sector.

➔ The United States now has the largest pipeline of gas-fired power plants in development globally, surpassing China—with a fifth to power data centres.

➔ Given the exponential use originating from image and video queries, most likely over time, we could see tiered pricing for heavy data users to match users’ data use for heavier AI tasks, Merwat said.

Felippa Amanta, who published a study on the AI deepfake challenge for Oxford University, goes a step further: “The deepfake’s effect on climate information and emotion will be much more significant than the direct energy to produce the deepfake.”

King Coal’s enduring rein

Spot the resilient fossil fuel in the chart below. Old King Coal set a new demand record last year, with coal-for-power generation also hitting its highest level ever. Trade in the carbon-intensive commodity also broke records in 2024. Coal is the world’s most carbon-intensive fossil fuel, with emissions on average 50% higher than natural gas.

Here are some coal trends that suggests it will endure for some time:

• China accounts for 56% of global demand, but India and the U.S. is expected to see production rise.

• The U.S. is considering several regulations that were poised to limit coal use in power generation. A Trump executive order also lifted “unattainable emissions controls” for coal plants to ensure energy security.

• The IEA expects global coal consumption to plateau in 2026, but rise 5% in the fast-growing ASEAN region.

• Despite coal’s resurgence, the IEA expects renewables-based electricity generation to overtake coal-fired generation in 2025.

Trends, tech and science

Ballard is powering through a global hydrogen reckoning. The Vancouver-based company that’s been plugging away at hydrogen tech since 1979, launched its second major shake-up in less than a year. It underscores the pressure hydrogen fuel cell companies face after years of hype. Under new CEO Marty Neese, Ballard is pivoting to a narrower set of applications where its technology has proven traction, like transit buses and stationary backup power. The 30% operating cost cut target for 2026 suggests that the pace of hydrogen buildout has been slower than the market—or Ballard’s earlier strategies—anticipated.

A global gridlock is stifling renewable energy. Nearly 40% of Scotland’s wind power capacity was curtailed due to grid constraints over the past six months. That’s the latest setback in a long list of renewable and affordable power being held back by a gridlock. For every dollar invested in renewable power, just 60 cents go to grids and storage—the ratio should be one-to-one, the UN estimates, noting that there’s three times more renewable energy waiting to be plugged into grids than was added last year.

Solar and wind are getting eclipsed. The White House’s war on renewables has seen projects valued at US$22-bilion scrapped in the first six months of 2025, according to E2 data . That’s 16,500 in jobs lost during the period. On the heels of the Big Beautiful Bill that would see low-carbon energy credits phased out faster, a new federal order subjects wind and solar projects to greater scrutiny as it “denigrates the beauty of our Nation’s natural landscape.” It echoes Alberta’s no-go zone directive last year.

RBC Briefings

• Trade Zone: Trump’s US$48 billion hit on American buyers

• Will Artificial Intelligence soon become Artificial Influence?

• John Stackhouse on the Ministry for the Future’s clarion call for climate action