Skip to main content

➔ AI gets all the attention, but the AC is also a major power drag, too

➔ Canada’s ghost emissions

➔ David Suzuki and Chris Wright’s starkly different world views

Hot takes

Ghost emissions are climate change’s untold story. Globally, emissions from Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) are tracked but not included in a country’s emissions inventory. While emissions from managed lands are included, emissions from unmanaged lands are excluded as they are triggered by events beyond human control-such as wildfires. But they are formidable: Wildfire on just managed lands had emissions in 2023 that surpassed Canada’s total accounted emissions-by a lot. This year’s LULUCF emissions could rack up, too. By June 2nd, total estimated wildfire emissions for Canada were second only to 2023, with approximately 56 megatonnes of carbon (or 8% of Canada’s GHG emissions in 2023), according to the EU CAMS Global Fire Assimilation System. That’s years of painstaking climate action wiped out in weeks. This highlights a fundamental tension in Canada’s climate policy: most of the attention has been on emissions mitigation; less attention has been paid to climate adaptation. And we are all paying the price.

Is it time for a $100-billion Pathway + pipeline package? Alberta and Ottawa are making progress on a big energy package that could include a West Coast oil pipeline, the long-contemplated Pathways project to capture carbon emissions, and room for expanded oil production, writes John Stackhouse from Calgary. But Mark Carney’s team may need to finesse its way out of the previous Liberal government’s oil and gas emissions cap. That could involve a new target, or delayed timeline, or a refined approach to measuring abated emissions. The package’s headline costs could also be sobering—up to $100 billion.

The Texas tragedy underscores the frequency, and intensity, of floods. More than 80% of Canadians live in urban areas, and around 8 out of 10 major Canadian cities are located in proximity to flood zones, according to the federal government. Floods are already Canada’s costliest natural hazard in terms of property damage, causing $2 billion in destruction annually, as climate change supercharges weather conditions. As part of a greater National Adaptation Strategy, Ottawa is spending  $164.2 million to update Canada’s flood mapping program by 2028. Will it be enough?

David Suzuki and Chris Wright’s recent comments highlight the tension between environmentalists and some energy proponents. Canada’s veteran environmentalist told iPolitics recently that its “too late” to reverse climate change as policymakers are focused on economic growth, not nature. Meanwhile, U.S. Energy Secretary Christ Wright sees the climate crisis as a byproduct of progress, not an existential threat. “I am willing to take the modest negative trade-off for this legacy of human advancement,” he wrote in The Economist. Policy is often driven by political cycles, with energy proponents winning this round. However, the next political cycle is around the corner.

Power-hungry data centres get all the attention, but the humble air conditioner is also a major strain on grids. As summers get more oppressive in Canada and around the world, the International Energy Agency expects air conditioners to be a top driver of global electricity demand, with air-conditioner ownership worldwide rising from 37% to 45% by 2030.

Here’s why cooling is emerging as a critical climate issue:

➔ Cooling generated just over 1 gigatonne of carbon emissions globally in 2022 (1.9% of total). Space cooling could also lead to leakage of refrigerants, which have a global warming potential of around 1,000 times higher than CO2.

➔ 2Energy demand for space cooling globally is growing at 4% annually, twice as fast as water heating. This is putting pressure on power capacity, especially as countries like Canada strain to keep their grids clean.

➔ In Canada, the percentage of households with an air conditioner hit 64% in 2021, compared to 55% in 2013. That’s even more impressive given the surge in households over the past decade.

➔ Buildings account for 18% of Canada’s total emissions. Of these, space heating and cooling represent more than 67% of building energy use.

➔ One in 10 Canadian households had a heat pump (which, of course, double up as air-conditioners) in 2021, from virtually zero a few years prior. Heat pumps are 4.5 times more efficient than conventional air conditioners, making them a key pillar of climate action.

➔ Residential heat pump imports jumped 71% in Canada in Q1, compared to the same period last year, the Heating, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Institute of Canada (HRAI) data shows.

➔ Federal and provincial Canadian policymakers are considering building codes that would stipulate at least one room with an air conditioner in a home.

➔ Access to cooling is emerging as a human rights issues, especially after nearly 600 people died in a Vancouver heat dome event in 2021.

➔ “An important driver of activity is climate-change mitigation, driven mostly by policy, rebate programs, incentive,” says Martin Luymes, Vice President, Government & Stakeholder Relations at HRAI. For instance, federal rebates led to record heat pump sales, which then dropped off when the programs ended. Several provinces including Ontario, B.C., and Nova Scotia continue to offer rebates, helping sustain interest.

➔ The Canadian HVAC industry sees the possible termination of the Energy Star program in the U.S. as a “major mistake,” says Luymes, noting that the program, which promotes energy-efficient products including air conditioners, as valuable, low-cost consumer guidance tools. Experts say scrapping or weakening Energy Star could harm climate progress.

Sign up to receive RBC Thought Leadership’s newsletter, major reports and analysis on the biggest ideas shaping Canadian business and the economy.

Donald Trump’s signature 2025-26 budget bill is now law. The legislation changes several clean energy tax incentives that were managed under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), tightens domestic content requirements, imposes new qualification deadlines and sunsets other tax credits that could impact Canadian cleantech firms eyeing opportunities across the border.

Here’s the good, the bad and the ugly of the OBBBA:

Carbon capture: The bill maintains credits for carbon capture, but also provides incentives for captured CO2 for oil production, underscoring the administration’s commitment to the fossil fuels industry.

Nuclear: The bill maintains credits for both existing nuclear facilities and new advanced energy technologies. However, new foreign entity provisions could inject uncertainty in the sector’s growth. The legislation is supported by an earlier executive order that targets a quadrupling of U.S. nuclear capacity from 100GW to 400 GW by 2050.

EVs: Electric vehicle manufacturing and competitiveness will be “hard hit,” according to the Center on Global Energy Policy, noting that the law could reduce domestic demand for EVs, jeopardize battery investment and allow China and other foreign competitors to gain greater market share.

Clean grid: Solar and wind power was particularly hard hit as historic investment and production tax credits sunset earlier than before. The law would reduce the build-out of new clean power generating capacity by 53-59% through to 2035, according to the Rhodium Group. An executive order following the OBBBA directs the U.S. Treasury Secretary to eliminate subsidies for “unreliable green sources like wind and solar,” that it believes is threatening national security. A separate executive order directs the Treasury Secretary to end “market-distorting subsidies for unreliable, foreign controlled energy sources.”

Critical minerals: Metallurgical coal is nowdeemed a “critical mineral,” allowing it to qualify for a production tax credit. The law also broadly reduced 45X Production Tax Credits for critical minerals to 2033 (compared to no limits before), which would pose a challenge as most critical minerals projects require long timelines. The Center for Strategic & International says the “amended tax credit disincentivizes investment in newly discovered greenfield projects with longer timelines to production in favour of brownfield legacy mines that may be closer to production but have lower grade reserves.”

China is the world’s energy transition workhorse. Around 74%, or 1.3 terawatt, of the world’s new wind and solar capacity is being built in the country, with the U.S. a distant second with 5.9% of all new projects, and India third at 5.1%, according to Global Energy Monitor. The 590GW of new Chinese wind capacity proposed or underway could power nearly all U.S. households. China’s inevitable cleantech dominance poses a conundrum for the West, as suggested by EU President Ursula von der Leyen earlier this month: “Beijing is at once a staunch competitor in the clean tech race, and a vital partner for global decarbonization.” A fractured G7 can’t keep Chinese tech out for too long.

Straddling cleantech and AI. Founded by veteran tech investor Nicholas Parker, CleanAI recently launched a networking and financing ecosystem for entrepreneurs and businesses intersecting AI and clean-tech. CleanAI research shows that the artificial intelligence-enabled cleantech solution space would require US$138 billion over the next five years and could mitigate up to 10% of global greenhouse gas emissions.

The Institute In Action

  • Last week, John Stackhouse visited Limberlost Place, Ontario’s first mass timber, net-zero carbon emissions building, to participate in a documentary about the project. The George Brown College building is set to open this fall in Toronto.

  • On July 15th, Nathan Janzen and Lisa Ashton gave a keynote presentation at the Dairy Farmers of Canada Annual General Meeting in Toronto.

Books on the team’s reading list:

  • Genesis, Henry Kissinger, Craig Mundie and Eric Schmidt, on AI’s transformative powers, in politics, security, prosperity and science. Read John’s review here.

  • The Explorer’s Gene: Why We Seek Big Challenges, New Flavors, and the Blank Spots on the Map, by Alex Hutchinson.

Curated by Yadullah Hussain, Managing Editor, RBC Climate Action Institute.

Climate Crunch would not be possible without John Stackhouse, Jordan Brennan, John Intini, Farhad PanahovLisa AshtonShaz MerwatVivan SorabCaprice Biasoni, Lavanya Kaleeswaran and Joelle Schonberg .

Have a comment, commendation, or umm, criticism? Write to me here (yadullahhussain@rbc.com)

Climate Crunch Newsletter

➔ A Silicon Valley of direct air capture set to debut in Alberta

➔ Global abundance: Exploring the New Energy Age

➔ Brazil is cooking up sustainable soybeans for China

Hot takes

The Silicon Valley of direct air capture is taking shape in central Alberta. Quebec-based Deep Sky, backed by a US$40-million grant from Bill Gates’ Breakthrough Energy, is opening its direct air capture innovation and commercialization centre in Innisfail in central Alberta this summer. The facility—seen as a hub for direct air capture activities—will serve as a sandbox for firms to test direct-air carbon-sucking technologies before they scale their operations commercially. Eight companies—from Canada, the U.S. and Germany and others—have already signed up. In a vote of confidence, the Alberta government also recently invested $5 million in DeepSky from the province’s Technology Innovation and Emissions Reduction Regulation (TIER) fund.

Ontario is crafting a new wood construction strategy. The recently announced Advanced Wood Construction Plan aims to promote wood use in larger and taller structures to accelerate projects, lower costs by as much as 20%. Swapping cement and steel with wood would also help lower emissions in a sector that accounts for 18% of Canada’s total emissions. Widespread adoption of wood, specifically mass timber, as a substitute or complement to concrete and steel could cut embodied emissions in buildings by as much as 25%, according to our report Mass Timber. The five-year plan comes as the province’s $20-billion industry is facing punitive U.S. tariffs.

Forecasters are scrambling to assess demand from data centres in the U.S. Electricity demand is now set to grow 25% by 2030 and 78% by 2050, compared to 2023 levels, according to a new report by ICF, a consulting firm. That’s an annual growth rate of 3.2% through 2030 (1.4% previously) and 2.2% (1.1% previously) through 2050 and contrasts with the past two decades when U.S. electricity demand was essentially flat. The strain on capacity could lead to a doubling of electricity prices by 2050, ICF warns. Texas, along with California and PJM region (covering 13 mid-Atlantic and Midwest states)—markets already importing Canadian electricity—will see the highest demand growth.

Brazil is developing bespoke, sustainable soybeans for China. Inspired by its successful Boi China beef model, the Latin American country aims to develop “Soy China,” through a supply chain that aligns with China’s environmental standards and runs on renewable energy. It’s also seen as a way for China to counter the EU Deforestation Regulations (EUDR), which have much stricter rules. Many countries (inside and outside the EU) have raised concerns about the EUDR because of its stringent traceability requirements that do not align with conventional soybean supply chains. And Brazil and China’s move is alternate route for soybeans to flow. The U.S. Department of Agriculture recently warned that sustainable soybeans would directly challenge American and Canadian exporters’ market share in China.

Nature capital: Canada’s other green power

By Lisa Ashton

As climate change disrupts the U.K.’s landscapes—from the Scottish Highlands to the Somerset Wetlands—the country is facing a £97-billion ($181-billion) nature asset deficit. The Green Finance Institute (GFI) estimates that planned public spending on conservation and restoration by the government is well short of delivering on its binding commitments, including the 25-year Environment Plan and the U.K.’s 30×30 targets under the UN Biodiversity targets. It also presents real risks and losses of between £150-£300 billion of U.K.’s GDP by 2030. The U.K. government is now seeking ideas from businesses, investors, and innovators to protect the “natural foundations of its economy,” and spur growth in its “burgeoning” nature services sector.

Canada can draw lessons from the U.K. experience. It’s home to landmark investments in several initiatives including the Great Bear Sea project finance for permanence (PFP), and watershed policy commitments to protect and conserve 30% of Canada’s land and water by 2030.

Canada’s is truly a nature powerhouse with riches that are second to none:

➔ It’s one of just five countries that collectively contain more than 70% of the world’s remaining intact ecosystems;

➔ 20% of the world’s total freshwater;

➔ 25% of the world’s wetlands;

➔ 24% of the world’s boreal forests;

➔ the world’s longest coastline;

➔ the world’s longest coastline;

➔ ecosystems in Canada provide essential habitat for approximately 80,000 species.

But, Canada, like many others, has not been able to unlock nature finance at scale to address declining natural capital as a share of GDP—roughly 70% in 1995 to about 40% today—and mitigate the risks associated with a natural environment that’s experiencing more deterioration than the U.S. and the U.K. Wildfires year-to-date alone could risk 0.4% of Saskatchewan’s GDP and 0.2% for Alberta, according to Statistics Canada estimates.

Nature finance is in its infancy, but a pathway to build natural capital in Canada and investments is slowly being charted. In 2022, the Government of Canada issued its first green bond, valued at $5 billion, with a portion of funds going to nature-based projects including financing that supports the adoption of climate-smart agriculture practices.

Exploring nature finance is an opportunity to build greater resilience in Canada’s natural resource dependent economy driven by fuel, food, fertilizer and forestry production.

Sign up to receive RBC Thought Leadership’s newsletter, major reports and analysis on the biggest ideas shaping Canadian business and the economy.

Gas flaring in Alberta is raising alarms among health professionals. The Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment (CAPE ) Alberta chapter cited research that shows a 1% increase in flaring exposure led to a 0.73% rise in respiratory-related hospital visits. The warning comes after Reuters reported that gas flaring blew past the province’s self-imposed limit on annual natural gas flaring in 2024, for a second year in a row. In June, the Alberta Energy Regulator said it was ending limits on flaring.

Overcapacity is reinforcing steel’s hard-to-abate reputation. Around 30% of steel capacity remains unused globally, an excess that’s sent prices plunging to a four-year low. With margins under pressure, steelmakers are hardly in the mood to decarbonize. The problem is set to worsen: more than 40% of new steelmaking capacity—mostly from “non-market” forces such as China—that’s set to enter the market by 2027 will be emission-intensive, according to an OECD report . Strengthening international co-operation to address excess capacity and market distortions will be vital to improve the outlook for steelmakers in market economies, the OECD recommends. That would give steelmakers the space to advance decarbonization efforts. New anti-dumping tariffs in Canada and the U.S., primarily aimed at China, is also an opportunity to establish a green steel market.

Plastic bag bans and fees are making a difference. Several U.S. jurisdictions that enforced these policies have seen a 25-47% dip in plastic bags as a share of total items collected in shoreline cleanups, according to an extensive University of Delaware and Columbia University study. The ban also reduced the number of animals entangled along the shoreline. Still, plastic pollution overall remains a growing challenge. The final round of a Global Plastics Treaty is set for August in Geneva.

The New Energy Age

By John Stackhouse

More, more, more energy.

That was the big message in the IEA’s 10th annual investment report.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) tracks investment flows for all forms of energy, and this year is more relevant than ever, given the volatility we’ve seen in energy prices this decade. While a slower global economy may temper some investment patterns, what gets built today will shape energy patterns in years to come.

Some highlights:

  • Capital flows to the energy sector are on course to reach US$3.3 trillion this year.

  • China is leading the energy investment surge, accounting for nearly a third of global investment, split almost evenly between grid and storage, renewable power and fossil fuels.

  • North America saw a record US$700 billion in investments in 2024, but will see pullback to US$690 billion this year. Clean energy investment is at an all-time high.

  • Would the U.S. new “big, beautiful bill” that guts several clean energy incentives, and Canada’s Bill C-5, that promotes clean and conventional energy projects, move the needle on energy investments?

  • The biggest use of investment globally is electrification, which will consume almost half ($1.5 trillion) of all energy capital.

  • Only a third of investment will go to oil, natural gas and coal:

  • lower oil prices are likely to keep investment down;

  • LNG investment is on “a strong upward trajectory,” led by the U.S., Qatar and Canada;

  • nuclear’s renaissance continues, rising by 50% over the past five years;

  • coal-fired power in advanced economies has ground to a halt, while it’s showing a comeback in China and India.

The bottom line is the world will continue to need to invest trillions a year in energy, across a wide array of sources. As that continues, some long-term trends are clear—more energy investment will go to Asia, especially China; more will go to electrification; and as our new report, “A G7+ Strategy for Natural Gas,” lays out, more will go to gas infrastructure.

Countries that develop the right policies will generate and attract the bulk of that capital, in what’s shaping up to be a New Energy Age.

The Institute In Action

  • John Stackhouse and Lisa Ashton visited the Kelburn Farm in Manitoba in late June. The demonstration farm operates out of the Red River Valley, a growing hotspot for agri-food innovation. The Kelburn Farm is a place for farmers, students, researchers, and companies along the agri-food supply chains to test and trial new ideas that are advancing Canadian agriculture.

  • Shaz Merwat was at the RBC Energy Transition Conference in London last week. He also attended a virtual International Energy Agency Conference on certified natural gas this week.

On the team’s reading list:

  • Crisis: A Global Case Primer, by Jason Miklian and John Katsos, on leading when things are falling apart.

  • Shaz Merwat was at the RBC Energy Transition Conference in London last week. He also attended a virtual International Energy Agency Conference on certified natural gas this week.

Curated by Yadullah Hussain, Managing Editor, RBC Climate Action Institute.

Climate Crunch would not be possible without John Stackhouse, Jordan Brennan, John Intini, Farhad PanahovLisa AshtonShaz MerwatVivan SorabCaprice Biasoni, Lavanya Kaleeswaran and Joelle Schonberg .

Have a comment, commendation, or umm, criticism? Write to me here (yadullahhussain@rbc.com)

Climate Crunch Newsletter

➔ Why Canada’s critical to G7+’s metal security

➔ Peak IEA vs OPEC fight

➔ A geothermal breakthrough

Hot takes

Canadians slammed the brakes on zero-emission car purchases in Q1. Sales were down 19.5% compared to the same period last year, while total light-duty vehicles, that includes hybrids and plug-ins, fell 3.2% during the period. New vehicle registrations accounted for 9.5% of total car sales in Q1, down from an impressive 18.9% in Q4, S&P Global data shows. A confluence of factors tripped up sales, including the end of the $5,000 federal rebate, a drop in Quebec’s rebate program, and tariff uncertainty. Tesla is also losing its brand appeal in Canada, securing less than 10% market share in April, down from 50% a few years ago.

G7 leaders were not the only luminaries in Alberta this month. Haitham al-Ghais, secretary-general of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, showed up in Calgary for the Global Energy Show with the bold claim that “there is no peak in oil demand on the horizon.” Over the past few years, OPEC and the International Energy Agency have bickered over the peak dates of oil, which the Paris watchdog believes could come before 2030. OPEC also recently called out the IEA for cutting its electric vehicle forecast as proof it was backtracking on its peak-demand theory. But the IEA remains firm, noting in its June forecast that a “peak in global oil demand is still on the horizon.”.

The Arctic is hot territory. Three new books this year show how the top of the world is now top of mind, as it warms up for—and to—more commerce. In The North Pole, Norwegian explorer Erling Kagge charts how explorers were traversing the region as early as the 1600s to find shortcuts from Europe to Asia. In End of the Earth, fossil hunter Neil Shubin explores what the latest science tells us about the riches beneath. And in Arctic Passages, journalist Keiran Mulvaney explores how thawing ice could cut trips from, say, Korea to the Netherlands, circumnavigating geopolitical flashpoints Suez and Panama canals.

Critical Canada

From Nice to Kananaskis, critical minerals are on everyone’s lips. But it was awkward in the coastal French city where delegates at the UN Ocean Conference criticized the U.S.’s interest in deep-sea mining, suggesting that the White House’s plans for offshore critical minerals set “a dangerous precedent that could destabilize the entire system of global ocean governance,” according to the International Seabed Authority (ISA). It seems that the business of developing clean energy inputs is not always, well, clean.

In Kananaskis, Canada corralled G7 nations to at least agree on a critical minerals “action plan .” While a united and sweeping G7 statement was being avoided on several matters to avoid the ire of the Oval Office, leaders agreed on developing a framework to finance new mines and downstream processing facilities, and reduce reliance on China for key metals such as lithium, cobalt and rare earth elements.

As a major producer of several commodities vital for the production of electric vehicles, defence, smart phones and wind turbines, Canada wants to play a key role, as part of its overarching “energy superpower” ambition.

There’s some awkwardness here, too as the federal government is starting to get some pushback: Chiefs of Ontario believe Bill C-5, proposed by the government to fast-track mining and other projects, will override environmental laws and “sidestep constitutional obligations.”

The private sector , which overwhelmingly wants all levels of governments to build an energy-agnostic utility corridor, also has a laundry list of concerns including cost overruns and delays of mega-projects, scope creep, stakeholder consultations, environmental assessments, and regulatory delays, according to a KPMG survey of Canadian executives.

Our report, The New Great Game, outlines how Canada can overcome challenges to scale its critical minerals sector. Further reading: Resourceful: How Canada can strike a new commodity deal with the U.S. and others

The Canada-Japan gas nexus

Japan is the Canadian energy sector’s new market—with a climate twist. B.C. Premier David Eby was in Japan as recently as this month, showcasing his province’s commodity resources, including energy. Meanwhile, Mitsubishi Corp.—an anchor investor in LNG Canada, will start receiving shipments from the facility starting in July.

Our new report on G7+ Strategy for Natural Gas , examines how member countries can leverage natural gas to ensure energy security. Canadian LNG can find a greater Asian foothold if it can align with Japan’s Green Transformation Emissions Trading System (GX-ETS), which is central to the Asian country’s carbon neutrality by 2050.

Here’s how:

  • Japan’s GX policy accepts low-carbon LNG—particularly if paired with methane abatement, carbon capture and storage (CCS), or certified emissions standards—as transition-aligned. Canadian LNG could qualify for long-term GX-aligned supply contracts, if emissions reductions are verifiable.

  • Japanese investment via GX Transition Bonds, especially in infrastructure such as liquefaction and CCS-enabled transport. Japan is collaborating with Australia and other countries on clean ammonia. Canada’s low-carbon certified energy products can tap several opportunities including financing through GX Transition Bonds and Japan’s Joint Crediting Mechanism (JCM).

  • Canada can also tap Japan’s plan to scale blue hydrogen imports, by developing natural gas with CCS.

  • Japan’s economy also needs power to maintain its edge in computation and digital infrastructure. Data centres, AI and digital infrastructure are going to depend on natural gas, offering another opening for Canada.

Read the full report here. Also watch John Stackhouse and lead author Shaz Merwat discuss the report.

The World Bank is entering the nuclear energy space. In a boost to nuclear, the World Bank is collaborating with the International Atomic Energy Agency, the UN nuclear watchdog, to support existing reactors and support “grid upgrades,” including SMRs, amid a push from the U.S. and Germany. Natural gas power plants, that do not “constrain renewables,” could also tap its funding. However, the World Bank’s board has not yet agreed on funding upstream natural gas development.

Carbon capture projects are ramping up. Between 2020 and 2030, carbon management project deployment is expected to be dominated by capture-only initiatives, which will account for approximately 45% of all operational and planned projects, according to a new report by the International Energy Forum . The U.S., the U.K. and Canada—in that order—have the highest number of proposed CCUS projects by 2030. That will take proposed global CCUS capacity to 1 gigatonne of CO2 by 2030 (equivalent of taking 306.3 million cars off the road for a year), with most initiatives financed through public funding.

A Bill Gates-backed geothermal firm reported an industry-shaking breakthrough. The industry is abuzz after Houston-based Fervo Energy drilled 15,765 feet in 16 days—a 79% cut in average drilling times. With drilling the costliest line item for geothermal companies, the feat is a giant step in making geothermal economically competitive with other energy sources. Second, its technology—borrowed heavily from fracking techniques—, allows the industry to look beyond geological sweet spots for geothermal, like Iceland. Gates’ Breakthrough Energy immediately rewarded the company with an additional US$100-million injection, part of a US$206-million investment round for the company.

Curated by Yadullah Hussain, Managing Editor, RBC Climate Action Institute.

Climate Crunch would not be possible without John Stackhouse, Jordan Brennan, John Intini, Farhad PanahovLisa AshtonShaz MerwatVivan SorabCaprice Biasoni, Lavanya Kaleeswaran and Joelle Schonberg .

Have a comment, commendation, or umm, criticism? Write to me here (yadullahhussain@rbc.com)

Climate Crunch Newsletter

➔ Climate-tech funding perks up

➔ Nuclear ramps up

➔ Got eco-friendly milk?

Hot takes

Canadian climate technology companies raised $468 million in Q1. That’s upfrom a paltry $39 million during the same period last year. It’s a bright beginning to the year following a sluggish period of investment from Q2-Q4 2024. First quarter funding in 2025 was mostly driven by energy storage and clean power deals. While the overall rise in climate technology funding is encouraging, additional investments in industrial innovation—beyond the $36 million raised to date this year from a single deal—will be critical in decarbonizing hard-to-abate industrial sectors.

Speaking of funding, Canada will need more foreign capital to realize its commodity ambitions. More than 100 mineral projects worth $107 billion, are at various stages of development in Canada over the next ten years, according to research by RBC’s Cynthia Leach, Shaz Merwat and Vivan Sorab. With Chinese investment in minerals effectively blocked by Ottawa, Canadian miners would need to tap a variety of countries such as those in America and Europe and institutions such as Middle East sovereign wealth funds, to emerge as a commodity powerhouse. Read the full report here. Also watch RBC analysts talk minerals.

After all the talk, nuclear is finally ramping up. A new U.S. executive order aims to speed up new nuclear plant applications within 18 months—and quadruple nuclear power generation in 25 years. Belgium is scrapping its nuclear phase-out law, while EU members Germany, Denmark, and Italy are reconsidering their stances on nuclear. Ontario also kickstarted a nuclear modular reactor in May. But New Brunswick is delaying its small modular reactor (SMR) plans after its two partners failed to raise capital and hire workers. Ambition is fine, but the challenge is finding the money and the people to execute.

INFRASTRUCTURE

Build, Baby, Build—But Also Wait

Lofty ambitions, meet ground realities.Despite a reset, Canada’s plans to build new clean and conventional energy projects are running up against familiar obstacles, such as stringent environmental rules and lack of Indigenous consent. Both are critical considerations that should not supersede national interest.

Provinces that stitched together new laws in a hurry are being asked to wait:

  • Ontario’s Bill 5, which is set to become law, gives the provincial government wide powers to allocate projects to “trusted proponents” in special economic zones. The Canadian Civil Liberties Association calls it an “alarming move,” that they say gives the government the authority to unilaterally scrap legal safeguards that protect vulnerable communities and some Indigenous people.

  • Worried about the surge in mining activity, First Nations in Ontario’s Ring of Fire region are demanding the bill be struck down. Mining claims at the Ring of Fire have shot up 67% since 2022, with just under 43,000 claims covering an area 14 times the size of Toronto city, according to Wildlands League.

  • In British Columbia, which is hoping to be an LNG and commodity hub, the government narrowly passed the Infrastructure Projects Act (the Speaker had to break the tie) aimed at fast-tracking projects, amid opposition from B.C. Assembly of First Nations, municipalities and environmental organizations.

  • Anishinabek Nation Regional Chief Scott McLeod said a national plan to advance projects without input could trigger another “Idle No More” movement.

What are the chances of the federal government facing similar headwinds as it embarks on pushing through a new wave of major projects? The NDP and Bloc Quebecois are already gearing up for a fight. For now, the momentum is with the “Build” crowd.

RBC’s John Stackhouse who wasin Quebec and British Columbia recently, says attitudes towards resource development, and oil and gas exports, are shifting. (Read John’s full briefing from Quebec and B.C. here).

But as Prime Minister Mark Carney and the premiers thrash out a plan and prepare a “national interest” bill, here’s what’s on their to-do-list:

  • Indigenous consent will be needed and will take time, especially under B.C.’s commitment to the UN Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. The First Ministers’ statement after their meeting acknowledges those challenges.

  • Premier Danielle Smith wants nine “terrible” federal policies, such as the proposed oil and gas emissions cap and tanker ban on B.C.’s northern coast, which she believes discouraged investment. How will policymakers balance their economic and environmental commitments?

  • Industrial carbon pricing remains another point of contention as it makes Canadian gas exports less competitive, but advance’s the country’s climate goals.

  • First Ministers’ focus on “decarbonized oil and gas pipelines” is another interesting proposition and would require leaning on carbon capture technology.

  • Building cleaner and more affordable electricity systems to ensure net-zero by 2050 could also spark activity in several industries such as steel, lumber and aluminum that have been deeply disrupted by U.S. tariffs.

Got eco-friendly milk? It appears consumers can’t have all three—nutrition, low emissions and water conservation—when picking milk. Good old-fashioned dairy is the most emissions- and water-intensive but also the most nutritious, according to a World Resources Institute study. Almond appears to be the greatest disappointment: consuming almost as much water as dairy but is rather unwholesome. The winner appears to be the lesser-known pea milk.

Canadian cleantech remains a man’s world. Women were paid 17% less than men in 2023 in the environmental and cleantech (ECT) space—more pronounced than the 12.8% wage deficit women face in the overall Canadian economy, Statistics Canada data shows. Even though women in the industry (41.6%) were almost twice as likely as men (24.6%) to have a university diploma or degree. Overall, 7 in 10 jobs were held by men in a sector that represents 1.7% of all Canadian jobs in 2023.

A garbage truck’s worth of plastic enters the ocean every minute.That catastrophe is what makes Ocean with David Attenborough compellingviewing (now out in cinemas). “In front of us is a chance to protect our climate, our food, our home,” said Attenborough, the famed 99-year-old biologist. Oceans absorb 30% of CO2 emissions from human activities, yet only 2.4% of oceans are protected—compared to the global pledge to protect 30% of the ocean by 2030. The UN, which is hosting a conference on oceans next week in Nice, France, notes that of its 17 Sustainable Development Goals, protecting “Life Below Water,” remains the most underfunded.

The Institute In Action

  • In British Columbia, John Stackhouse joined a meeting between the Greater Vancouver Board of Trade and Calgary Chamber to discuss Canada’s role in global natural gas exports.

  • Myha Truong-Regan attended the Walrus Talks, Power Economy: Using Electricity to Change Cities, Homes, and Industry recently, to hear seven climate thought leaders and practitioners argue why the future is and must be electric.

  • Varun Srivatsan spoke to an audience at the Saskatchewan First Nations Energy Forum last week on equity financing and the importance of capacity, capital and consent to resource development.

On the team’s reading list

  • Fantasyland, a 500-year history of “How America Went Haywire” by Kurt Andersen. Read John’s review here.

  • Hotshot: A Life On Fire by River Selby, on wildfires and insights on U.S. federal fire policy, Indigenous land use and ecological history.

  • Is A River Alive? by Robert Macfarlane, tracks flowing water in Ecuador, India and Canada.

  • Who is government: The Untold Story of Public Service, by Michael Lewis, explores the vast complexity of American bureaucracy.

Curated by Yadullah Hussain, Managing Editor, RBC Climate Action Institute.

Climate Crunch would not be possible without John Stackhouse, Jordan Brennan, John Intini, Farhad PanahovLisa AshtonShaz MerwatVivan SorabCaprice Biasoni, Lavanya Kaleeswaran and Joelle Schonberg .

Have a comment, commendation, or umm, criticism? Write to me here (yadullahhussain@rbc.com)

Climate Crunch Newsletter

➔ A battery storage project going live and an approved SMR project suggests Canada can build

➔ Mark Carney’s cabinet: The fixer, the insider and the skeptic

➔ General Fusion needs financial infusion

Hot takes

Canada is a methane-busting powerhouse. The International Energy Agency ranks Canada as among the lowest in methane intensity among major oil and gas producers including the United States, Russia and Iran. Emissions from methane, a far more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide, remains at a high level globally despite pledges and available solutions that can lower fossil fuel emissions at “near zero” costs, the IEA estimates. Worse: methane emissions remains widely underreported globally, the agency said in its latest Methane Tracker report.

Canada is a methane-busting stalwart

The U.S. is going after solar power—and showers. A new U.S. Republican proposal aims to rollback popular tax credits for home solar and electric vehicles. The sweeping proposal to gut several incentives in the Inflation Reduction Act and other programs will save the government US$560-billion over a decade, but raise U.S. household costs by 7% by 2035, analysts say. The cuts could also impede U.S. efforts to cut emissions by 43% to 48% below 2005 over the next decade. Another U.S. proposal aims to scrap rules that conserve water in shower and toilets; also on the block: the Energy Star program that’s been credited for boosting energy efficiency and cutting utility bills.

The number of rare earth projects in Canada currently stand at 12. These constitute projects that are active in the exploration, resource estimation, or the preliminary economic assessment phase. Three separation and processing facilities and two rare earth elements (REE) recycling plants already exist, according to a report by Vivan Sorab, senior manager, clean technology. Fixing a couple of bottlenecks could help fast track the 12 projects. First, government investment, such as provincial funding in Saskatchewan, can help bring rare earth processing facilities closer to commercialization. Offtake agreements at competitive prices could also help Canada’s REE industry get a foothold.

Planting trees isn’t enough to tackle climate change. The world needs a global industry focused on removing carbon via nature-based and man-made solutions from the atmosphere at scale. Listen to a new episode of Disruptors X CDL: Innovation Era, where John Stackhouse and Sonia Sennik sit down with David Keith, a pioneer in carbon removal and founder of Carbon Engineering, to explore what it will take to build a low-carbon future.

POLICY

The fixer, the insider and the skeptic

Tim Hodgson, the new federal energy and resource minister, has been charged by his boss Mark Carney to make Canada a “leading energy superpower.” Hodgson will have to play the role of fixer in the resources sector, that includes mending relationships with Western provinces and Indigenous groups to make that dream come true. So far, he has been warmly received in the West, where grievances over Ottawa’s attitudes towards fossil fuels run deep—and remain live.

Julie Dabrusin, the Minister of Environment and Climate Change of Canada, has elicited a different reaction from oil and gas provinces. Her bio boasts a “strong stance against oil sands expansion,” raising concerns. But her insider knowledge as a parliamentary secretary to the Ministers of Natural Resources and Environment and Climate Change, and a member of the Natural Resources Committee, will be vital for Ottawa to streamline and fast-track project developments, including oil and gas pipelines. The Prime Minister seems open to the idea of new fossil fuel pipelines, as is Quebec. “Quebecers are saying, ‘There’s no way Trump is going to control the oil we produce in Alberta.’ So, can we export it to Europe through Quebec instead of being stuck with Trump? There’s openness. I feel things are shifting,” Premier Francois Legault said recently, adding that no concrete projects had been proposed.

While former environment minister Steve Guilbeault is now in charge of the heritage file, his skepticism about the economics of an east-to-west oil pipelines on his first day back in parliament, has also raised eyebrows. His portfolio appears to include Parks Canada, which gives him a platform to raise issues of biodiversity and nature erosion brought about by climate change. Committee to watch: Cabinet committees are where most of the business of government is transacted. One committee to watch will be the Build Canada committee, tasked with considering issues as diverse as housing, infrastructure, Indigenous economic prosperity, climate action and a host of others. The tag-team of Hodgson and Chrystia Freeland–chair and vice-chair of the committee–will provide a mix of private sector expertise and cabinet experience.

CLEANTECH

Financial infusion for General Fusion

General Fusion needs fresh capital. The B.C.-based nuclear fusion company announced a technological breakthrough that brings it one step closer to bringing zero-carbon fusion tech to the electricity grid. But the company also cut its headcount due to “unexpected and urgent financing constraints,” and is seeking new capital “to finish the job,” CEO Greg Twinney said.

Nuclear fusion mimics how stars create energy—an incredibly complex technology that’s perpetually “five years away,” but has gained investor interest in recent years on the back of several tech advances.

General Fusion also needs the stars to align. While the Canadian federal and provincial governments have injected funds in the company in the past, Twinney is looking for more financing including from the private sector, as the company’s competing with “nationally funded fusion programs around the world.” Since 2002, the company has raised US$440.53 million, according to PitchBook, and include counts Temasek, BDC Capital, and Chrysalix Venture Capital and Jeff Bezos as investors. The company recently hired the former CEO of the Amazon.com Inc. founder’s rocket company Blue Origin LLC as a strategic adviser.

The U.S. has been spending US$800 million annually in fusion technology in recent years, while China has injected between US$1-billion to US$1.5 billion annually. There are now around 98 demonstration plants or prototypes operating globally, another 13 under construction and 33 more planned.

Domestic rivals are also nipping at General Fusion’s heels. Montreal’s Fuse Energy raised US$32 million in new funding late last year, with the U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) as its largest collaborator and potential customer. The idea is to make Fuse to NNSA, what SpaceX is to NASA, said its 24-year-old CEO JC Btaiche. Last year, the Canadian Nuclear Laboratories called for a Canadian Fusion Strategy to help the country advance its net-zero emissions target by 2050. Canada provides the least government support for fusion development on a per capita basis among its G7 peers, CNL noted.

Ontario is set to build the G7’s first SMR. The province gave Ontario Power Generation the greenlight to start building the first of four small modular reactors at its Darlington New Nuclear Project—the first nuclear project in the province in three decades.

The Oneida energy storage operation is now live. The development in southern Ontario, near Hamilton, in Haldimand County is the fourth largest battery storage facility in the world. Its 278 lithium-ion battery units will store enough power to keep southern Ontario buzzing when demand peaks, or other sources get too expensive. Powered by renewable sources, the Indigenous-led project will reduce Ontario’s emissions by up to 4-million tonnes, equivalent to taking nearly 850,000 gas-powered cars off the road for a year. It may soon become a model for big demand users (such as datacentres) as they explore options. Read John Stackhouse’s blog on how battery storage gives us even more optionality to ensure costs remain low, relatability remains high and Canada’s climate commitments are fulfilled.

Recycling seems to be going out of fashion. A report by think-tank Circle Economy found only 6.9% of the 106-billion tonnes of materials used annually by the global economy came from recycled sources, a 2.2% point drop since 2015. While the use of recycled materials rose 200-million tonnes from 2018 to 2021, overall material consumption rose much faster, offsetting these improvements, Circle noted.

The Institute In Action

John Stackhouse attended the B7 Conference in Ottawa last week, where he presented preliminary findings from RBC’s joint project with Columbia University’s Center on Global Energy Policy, focused on exploring policy options for gas and LNG.

➔ On April 30th, John and Lisa Ashton presented our latest research on agriculture, food, and postsecondary education to the Deans Council-Agriculture, Food and Veterinary Medicine in Ottawa, highlighting key insights on talent development, innovation, and sector resilience.

➔ Read Head of Climate Research Myha Truong-Regan’s four key takeaways from a recent gas and electricity event organized by the Toronto Region Board of Trade.

➔ As part of the Salazar Center for North American Conservation’s symposium in Vancouver this month, the RBC Climate Action Institute co-hosted a roundtable with Nature United. Lisa hosted the discussion, which focused on how nature conservation and stewardship can be positioned as a strategic asset in pro-growth plans for nature-dependent sectors, including forestry, agriculture, and mining.

➔ On the team’s reading list: The Measure of Progress: Counting What Really Matters by Diane Coyle Bad Company: Private Equity and the Death of the American Dream, By Megan Greenwell; Transcend: Unlocking humanity in the age of AI, by Faisal Hoque.

Issue #12

➔ On Carney’s to-do list: carbon capture project and transition bonds
➔ Warren Buffett’s successor built the company’s energy empire
➔ Struggling cleantech stars, and a Climate Fiction Prize

Hot takes

➔ Canada’s EV policies are hurting farmers. Ottawa’s tariffs on Chinese EVs has had the “unintended consequence” of Beijing slapping levies on Canadian canola, lobsters, and peas, etc., agriculture members of the Canadian Federation of Independent Businesses’ wrote in a letter to three federal ministers. Canada’s $62 billion in total subsidies to EV firms has also not triggered an investment boom as those firms have paused their plans in Canada, CFIB pointed out. The group wants some of those funds redirected to small businesses.

➔ Did green power trigger Iberian blackouts? Some suggest “non-controllable” resources—i.e. solar and wind that can’t be controlled or scheduled on demand—were to blame. But it’s not like fossil-fuels grids can’t break down (Italy in 2003, anyone?). But intermittent generation poses a different set of problems. While authorities remain in the dark for now, the Spanish grid operator REE had warned in February that reliance on renewables could lead to grid instability, especially if the government closes its nuclear power plants by 2027. Could the simple answer be: keep the energy mix diversified?

➔ Warren Buffett’s successor is an energy empire builder. The Oracle of Omaha handpicked Edmontonian Greg Abel to succeed him at Berkshire Hathaway. As chairman of the company’s energy and other non-insurance businesses, Abel runs a conglomerate that’s among the largest operators of wind and solar energy in the U.S., electric utilities, and natural gas pipelines. While Berkshire Hathaway runs some of the dirtiest coal plants in the U.S.—coal power now accounts for only 22% of Berkshire’s power generation, compared to 71% in 2005.

➔ Ontario is fast-tracking critical minerals development. The new proposed rules will boost investment in local supply chains and reducing reliance on foreign imports would drive job creation, stimulate economic growth, and position Ontario as a leader in the green economy. The new rules also give the province wide powers to shield its strategic assets against “hostile foreign actors and regimes.” The move comes as the U.S. is moving at a frenzied pace to lock in critical minerals, including a deal with Ukraine, fast-tracking of supply chains, and plans to accelerate deep-sea mining.

CLIMATE POLICY

Carney’s Climate Corridors

Economy and trade tops the new federal government’s priority list, but there’s room to push through climate policies—especially “energy corridors,” that are seen as the path to an investment-led growth spurt.

Here are some high-profile climate files on the new government’s to-do list:

➔ Building a major carbon capture project in Alberta. How can a CCS project backed by Pathways Alliance—a consortium of oilsands firms looking to build a carbon capture project—get off the ground? Prime Minister Mark Carney said last week in Edmonton he is keen to see it built.

➔ Strengthening industrial carbon policy. The Conservatives wanted to repeal the federal carbon pricing for industrial emissions, but it stays for now. Last year, Myha Truong-Regan, RBC Climate Action Institute’s Head of Climate Research, co-wrote on how industrial carbon markets can be central to Canada’s efforts to accelerate energy transition.

➔ A Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. It was in the Liberal platform and could be Canada’s version of a climate-tariff—if it proceeds—helping climate-compliant Canadian companies compete with high-emitting foreign rivals. The Europeans may nod approvingly, but a Canadian CBAM will likely face strong pushback—and retaliation—from the U.S. and other trade partners.

➔ Carbon Contracts for Difference (CCfD). Carney is supportive of expanding the initiative, but the federal government is already dealing with a laundry list of other financial priorities.

➔ Climate risk disclosure. The idea was floated on the platform just as Canada’s provincial securities commissions suspended their work on making climate-related disclosure mandatory for public companies.

➔ Transition bonds. The Liberal platform suggests financing clean industrial and agriculture projects with $10 billion in bonds issued annually.

➔ Oil and Gas Emissions Cap. There might be tweaks after Carney suggested he would work with industry and provinces “on specific ways to get those reductions, as opposed to … having preset caps or preset restrictions on preset timelines.”

➔ For more, read John Stackhouse’s blog on Carney’s energy options in the age of Trump.

Climate treads, tech & science

➔ Li-Cycle is running out of road. The Toronto-based company’s woes persist with its CEO departing after a takeover deal with Swiss miner Glencore collapsed.

➔ Quebec won’t save Lion Electric Co. No white knight yet for the electric bus and truck maker that has struggled amid delays in subsidy and incentive programs in Canada and the U.S., and supply-chain disruptions.

➔ Nova Scotia-based Planetary Technologies won US$1 million XPrize. The ocean-based CO2 removal tech firm beat 1,300 rivals to win a slice of the US$100-million competition backed by Elon Musk. Mati Carbon, an American-Indian-African company, won the $50-million grand prize for its carbon-removal tech.

➔ Listen to Mike Kelland of Planetary Technologies, Jim Mann of UNDO who won US$5 million from XPrize, Dr. David Keith, a pioneering climate scientist and co-founder of Carbon Engineering, speak to RBC Disruptors hosts John Stackhouse and Sonia Sennik, on the innovation race to scale carbon removal technologies.

➔ Nunavut welcome solar power. A tiny community on the Arctic Circle will be able to ditch diesel generators—in the summers at least—once 2,500 solar panels are switched on soon. 

➔ Climate Fiction Prize. Boy meets girl amid climate change, and love in the time of wildfires are among the themes explored in the five novels short-listed in the first-ever £10,000 Climate Fiction Prize . The winner will be picked at the Hay Festival later this month in Wales.

The Institute In Action

➔ Many of Canada’s top Indigenous leaders came together for the RBC-sponsored 8th annual First Nations Major Projects Coalition conference, to see how we can better mobilize capital for Indigenous-partnered projects. RBC also published a report, Building Together , and hosted a private roundtable with 30 Indigenous leaders and CEO’s around building Canada’s economic resilience, and the central role of Indigenous partnerships and inclusion.

➔ Grow Ontario Food Summit brought together agriculture and food leaders from across Ontario. RBC Thought Leadership’s John Stackhouse and Lisa Ashton delivered the keynote address on Canada-U.S. trade relations and its impacts on agriculture and food, and highlighted key insights from our latest research report, Food First. On the team’s reading list: Just Earth: How a Fairer World Will Save the Planet by Tony Juniper; What’s Left: Three Paths Through the Planetary Crisis, by Malcolm Harris; Values: Building a Better World for All, by Mark Carney; Abundance, by Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson.

Curated by Yadullah Hussain, Managing Editor, RBC Climate Action Institute.

Climate Crunch would not be possible without John StackhouseMyha Truong-ReganSarah PendrithFarhad PanahovLisa AshtonShaz MerwatVivan SorabCaprice Biasoni and Frances Dawson.

Have a comment, commendation, or umm, criticism? Write to me here (yadullahhussain@rbc.com)

Climate Crunch Newsletter

Issue #11

➔ Earth Day edition focuses on Canada and B.C.’s power struggles
➔ Green steel is coming
➔ EVs: Open road or roadblocks?

Hot takes

➔ Our power, our planet. That’s the theme of this year’s Earth Day, celebrated today, just as the world feels a little less empowered to take care of the planet. But this edition is striving to celebrate small victories in a (very) long journey to heal the planet. Despite policymakers axing or toning down several ambitious global climate policies, there are rays of sunshine: led by solar and wind, renewable energy capacity additions hit a new record globally in 2024, while renewables accounted for more than 92% of total power expansion last year. Still, IRENA forecasts, the world’s falling short of the collective goal set in 2023 to triple installed renewable energy capacity by 2030.

➔ Sault Ste. Marie, Ont., is the setting for a Canadian green power revolution. The northern Ontario-based Algoma Steel is gearing up to launch its electric arc furnace (EAF) this month—it would cut back on coke, or coal power, and slash the company’s annual emissions by 70%. That’s a feat for any sector, but a monumental one for an industry considered among the hardest to abate.

➔ Canada’s first SMR got the green light this month. The small modular reactor (SMR) at the Darlington Nuclear Generating Station in Ontario—the first in a G7 nation— has the all-clear from the Canadian National Safety Commission. Ontario Power Generation, the developer, is now awaiting the provincial okay. There is a trade twist, though: the BWRX-300 reactor was built by North Carolina-based GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy—making Canada dependent on the American supply chain at a time when ties between the two countries are strained.

➔ Climate drops off the radar as an election issue. About 24% of Canadians believed climate was an important issue in the 2021 federal election cycle. Just under 4% feel the same way as they start voting in the run-up to election day on April 28. Predictably, U.S.-Canada ties topped the list in the non-partisan Vote Compass’s poll of 161,000 Canadians, followed by economy, affordability, social justice and healthcare. The environment did not crack the top 5. Climate change also barely got a mention in the leaders’ TV debates (read John Stackhouse’s LinkedIn post here).

Earth Day: A Clean Super-Power

With this year’s Earth Day theme focused on tripling renewable energy by 2030, Canada can point to some victories in the electricity sector, the big one being that it’s Paris Agreement-compliant already. Alberta is coal-free, six years ahead of schedule, while Canada’s absolute electricity emissions declined by about 10% in 2024 compared to 2023.

Three charts that illustrate why electricity is Canada’s climate poster child:

There is no room for complacency, though. Here are 3 critical challenges Canadian policymakers—and a new federal government—will need to address soon.

➔ Balancing affordability with clean energy goals. New hydro dams and nuclear buildouts will be expensive, straining the ability of utilities to keep electricity bills affordable. 

➔ Expanding grids cleanly. Canada needs to more than double electricity capacity by 2050—and keep it clean—, if it wants to compete for investment dollars for data centres, automotive supply chains and other heavy manufacturing.

➔ Ensuring Indigenous rights. Power and energy projects—gaining renewed urgency—require a buy-in, consent and financial involvement from First Nations. Canada has had a spotty track-record on that file, which needs to change to fast-track projects.

Ready or not

Sticking to the power theme, B.C. LNG projects now only need to be net-zero ready. That’s the distinction the B.C. government made in a new letter to the environmental regulator, widely considered a weaking of the province’s environmental rules. Or is that climate realism ? Jurisdictions are walking a fine line as they fast-tack new projects in a tariff-stricken world without abandoning their environmental commitments.

The provincial utility BC Hydro has been bulking up, but not as fast as the surge in demand, which it estimates will rise 15% by 2030. Just over 90% of B.C. grid is no-emitting, but that could drop if natural gas power.

Here’s how the province is racing to meet its economic and climate goals:

➔ BC Hydro’s updated 10-Year Capital Plan (2024/25 to 2033/34) includes almost $36 billion in community and regional infrastructure investments—a 50% increase over its previous capital plan.

➔ The Site C hydro project’s fourth unit began this month, with two more set to be switched on by the fall. Once fully operational, the project in the province’s northeast can power nearly 500,000 homes, increasing BC Hydro’s electricity supply by 8%. Given expectations for Canada’s supply needing to 2x or 3x by 2050, we need similar additions every two to three years, Energy policy lead Shaz Merwat estimates. “Policy of needing to be ‘ready’ probably adds a level of ambiguity but good to see perspectives are changing about the need to build.”

➔ In February, B.C. signed deals for 9 wind and 1 solar energy projects with a combined 4,830 gigawatt hours (GWh) projects. All projects are majority-owned by First Nations.

➔ B.C. is working to electrify Northern B.C., vital for several big-ticket energy projects including the Ksi Lsims LNG project that’s currently under regulatory review. The Indigenous-backed gas export project now faces competition for Asian markets from an Alaskan LNG development that’s gaining traction. Canada needs to move fast.

➔ The North Coast Transmission Line is a critical piece of the northern B.C. clean grid. The government is fast-tracking permits to speed up construction of the NTCL and other major high-voltage transmission lines.

➔ The B.C. government is not ruling out more hydro dams in the province.

➔ Finally, we are watching how a greenhouse gas emissions cap for natural gas utilities, as envisioned in the CleanBC Roadmap to 2030, will play out.

Four roadblocks ahead for EVs

By John Stackhouse

EVs may be one of the causalities in the trade war — or one of the winners. It’s too early to tell.

The latest quarterly assessment from BloombergNEF shows a U-turn forming in some markets, and acceleration in others, notably China. Canada is one of the markets at a turning point.

EVs, including plug-in hybrids, accounted for one in five vehicle sales last year, reaching 17.2 million new vehicles on the road, up 24% in one year. Most of that growth was in China, where close to half of new vehicle sales are EVs—a number expected to increase this year thanks to a scrappage scheme for car-owners.

Elsewhere, EVs are facing new challenges, and not just the brand war that Tesla finds itself in. European sales started to flatline in 2024, while sales growth in the U.S. tempered. And that was before Liberation Day (April 2) and Donald Trump’s decision to slap 25% tariffs on imported vehicles and parts. Higher costs are the last thing EV producers need. Other policy changes—looser fuel standards in Europe and an end to the consumer carbon tax in Canada—may further impede EV sales, as the economics of traditional car engines gain ground again on batteries.

Canadian EV sales in the past year accounted for around 15% of passenger vehicle sales. BNEF expects Canadian EV sales to rise 20% this year, amid a decline in policy supports.
If EV sales stall, it will be due to four roadblocks in the months ahead:

➔ 1. Subsidies. Fiscally challenged governments will be looking to cut spending in some areas to pay for economic supports for businesses and workers hit by the trade war. The Trump administration has its eye on generous supports introduced in the Biden years. And many governments are pulling back EV mandates for their own fleets.

➔ 2. Tariffs. The U.S. is advancing a range of tariffs and trade restrictions on batteries and battery components, while China is also restricting exports of critical minerals. Battery-specific tariff rates are projected to hit 115% this year, and 132% next year. The Trump administration is also expected to continue to explore anti-dumping measures against Chinese battery components producers, even though a number of U.S. manufacturers, including Tesla, rely on them.

➔ 3. Economic growth. If the trade war continues to be a drag on economic growth, consumers will hold back on vehicle purchases of all kinds — and the more expensive range of EVs will be especially challenged.

➔ 4. Interest rates. If tariffs stoke inflation, and keep interest rates higher, car sales will be the first consumer item to take a dent, or worse. EVs may be at the front of that line, as car-owners hold on to their old vehicles for a year or two longer.

Climate Crunch would not be possible without John StackhouseMyha Truong-ReganSarah PendrithFarhad PanahovLisa AshtonShaz MerwatVivan SorabCaprice Biasoni and Frances Dawson.

Curated by Yadullah Hussain, Managing Editor, RBC Climate Action Institute.

Have a comment, commendation, or umm, criticism? Write to me here (yadullahhussain@rbc.com)

Climate Crunch Newsletter

Field Notes: How Canadian businesses are navigating trade tensions

China’s 100% tariff on canola oil and meal has Canadian farmers concerned. That stress level could climb, as China also has its eye on Canadian canola seeds—the largest segment of our canola exports to China—, which have been spared for now. “That would be the other big shoe to drop,” said Rick White, CEO of the Canadian Canola Growers Association (CCGA), which represents approximately 40,000 farmers across Canada.

Canola was developed by Canadian scientists in the 1960s—hence the name. It’s considered healthy oil as it’s low in saturates (an unhealthy fat) and high in monounsaturates (considered good). Canada is the world’s largest canola producer and counts, with 40,000 farmers generating $43.7 billion, with the U.S., China and Japan—in that order, its three biggest export markets. Australia is among Canada’s biggest canola rivals.

As the Chinese tariffs hit Canadian canola farmers, they are freezing investments and need support. White shared some ideas on ways to soften the blow:

  • White says the tariffs were not a surprise, as past disputes with China (2019-2020) had targeted canola.

  • China has once again targeted the agriculture sector in direct response to Ottawa implementing tariffs on Chinese EVs, aluminum and steel.

  • The industry feels the Canadian government “absolutely bears the responsibility” of that action and should compensate farmers for the financial losses that they will incur.

  • Other major canola seed exporting countries include Australia, Ukraine, Russia. Canada specifically grows canola, which is defined as having low erucid acid and low glucosinolates. Australia and the EU are also significant growers of canola or double low rapeseed, which is of comparable quality.

Canola seeds in the crosshairs

  • A looming Chinese anti-dumping investigation on Canadian canola seed could trigger more tariffs. That’s “the big shoe to drop.”

  • Canola seed is Canada’s primary canola export to China, with canola oil and meal accounting for a smaller portion. In 2024, China imported six million metric tonnes of Canadian canola seed, worth $4 billion.

  • The Chinese are following World Trade Organization (WTO) rules around anti-dumping. WTO challenges take time but provide legal recourse. The CCGA has registered as a party to China’s investigation.

Farmers are looking to freeze investments

  • Farmers rotate crops for agronomic reasons, but canola is a Canadian staple crop, which limits alternatives. Agronomics involves soil and crop management and helps optimize distribution, management and productivity of land.

  • Farmers are already expressing concerns about market risks from China and the U.S. with some suggesting delays in capital investments and equipment purchases due to uncertainty.

  • Plus, purchase of new equipment could possibly come from the U.S. that could be subject to countervailing duty by Canada.

  • “Farmers are not going to take that risk of investing big pieces of capital into renewing infrastructure … there’s going to be a big chill on investment, at least this year.”

Across the border, more trouble is brewing

  • The U.S. is Canada’s largest canola export destination, valued at $7.7 billion in 2023. The U.S. has not yet imposed a 25% tariff on canola, as CUSMA (the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement) remains in effect. But once exemptions expire, new U.S. tariffs could further harm Canadian canola exports.

There are ways to build a tariff-less ecosystem

  • Last December, the CCGA sent a letter to the federal government, forecasting farm gate losses of between $1.76 billion to $4.33 billion for 2025-26 due to the Chinese tariffs.

  • Ottawa has announced new loan products to sustain the industry, but farmers argue they cannot borrow their way through this crisis and need cash compensation.

  • “The federal government needs to compensate farmers commensurate with the losses that they will incur because of China… farmers can’t, nor should they, be expected to borrow their way—they need to be compensated.”

  • The CCGA is advocating for the development of a domestic biofuels and sustainable aviation market.

  • It could be a new domestic market for at least 2-3 million tonnes of canola seed. It would help soften the blow for canola farmers, as the risk and uncertainty around U.S. and Chinese markets is going to remain for a long time. It is an opportunity to help diversify and reduce Canada’s heavy dependence on China and the U.S. markets.


Dig deeper:

RBC Chief Economist Frances Donald answers three questions on Trump’s tariffs and its impact on the global economy.

Q: What do the U.S. tariff exemptions mean for Canada’s economic growth outlook? U.S. still has tariffs on Canadian autos, steel and aluminum.
FD:
 How quickly the Canadian economic narrative has shifted. Prior to “Liberation Day,” our biggest concern was the implications of broad based tariffs on Canadian growth and particularly, that Canada appeared to be the biggest relative loser of American trade policy. Now, while various sector specific tariffs will weigh on Canada in 2025, our concerns are shifting to more “traditional” risks to Canada’s economy—the rising risk of a U.S. recession and a drop in oil prices. The latter may be more “indirect” in some capacity, but they are also more of a function of global developments that have far less to do with Canadian-U.S. political relations.

Q: Do you expect the Bank of Canada and the U.S. Federal Reserve to reassess as U.S. tariffs are rolled out?
FD: The Bank of Canada and the Federal Reserve are facing different challenges, just like their economies are struggling with different risks. In Canada, inflation is around 2% with some mild upside created by global supply chain disruptions ahead. And yet, Canadian growth is still tepid and supportive of a few more rate cuts. As of now, we continue to expect another 50bps of rate cuts.

The Federal Reserve is in a much greater bind. The size and scope of tariffs announced are consistent with higher inflation and a much lower growth profile. That “stagflationary” mix pulls at both sides of the Fed’s dual-mandate in opposite directions (price stability and full employment). At this point, our expectation is that concerns about inflation spiralling higher will keep the Federal Reserve on the sidelines, but markets have been increasing their probabilities of rate cuts to support what is likely to be a much weaker economy.

Q: A bigger tariff war looms, with the U.S.-China and U.S.-EU imposing tariffs and retaliatory tariffs. Will that be inflationary and damaging for the Canadian and global economy?
FD: Just how damaging U.S. tariffs turn out to be will largely be a function of how long they stay in place for, and economists are poorly credentialled on making that call. But the largest concern at this juncture is that we witness a global uptick in prices as supply chains become entangled and the interconnected nature of our global economy makes it difficult for any economy to escape rising costs. There are certainly similarities to the COVID era that can be drawn, except for one major one: we didn’t head into pandemic-era inflation having just gone through pandemic-era inflation. That is, Canadians and Americans have already experienced an over 20% increase in prices since 2020, and the ability of households and businesses to absorb a second wave of inflation so soon after is likely very limited. Last month, it seemed the trade war was North American centric. Now, it is global and without borders.

Further reading:

Yadullah Hussain is Managing Editor, RBC Thought Leadership

Field Notes: How Canadian businesses are navigating trade tensions

Canada’s agriculture sector is among the first casualties of the trade wars with China and the United States. Monty Reich, CEO of SWT Ltd, a farmer-owned, independent grain and crop input company in Saskatchewan, discusses how farmers are navigating the trade tensions.

Uncertainty and volatility a near-daily irritant

  • The current environment is challenging, uncertain—and confusing. “Each day is a different journey,” Reich said.

  • Even before the 100% Chinese tariffs on canola oil and meal and yellow peas were imposed, the U.S. had started talking tariffs in December, with durum wheat on the list to be hit.

  • SWT had to absorb the financial blow of U.S. tariffs on durum wheat, choosing not to pass those costs onto its farmer-shareholders. “We sold product into future spring positions and took that hit on our own bottom line,” Reich noted.

  • U.S. tariffs have made durum wheat exports more costly. “We are the importer of record,” Reich noted, meaning SWT itself is directly responsible for paying the 25% tariff—a cost that prohibits any future sales.

Canola prices are plunging

  • For canola farmers, the impact has been brutal. Prices have plunged by 25-30% since the Chinese tariffs were imposed, dropping from around $16 per bushel to $12.

  • “Margins on the farm are pretty narrow as it is,” Reich said. Even small price shifts can turn a profitable season into a financial disaster. With this level of decline, farmers are watching their incomes evaporate.

Tariffs are hitting from all quarters

  • China’s restrictions on canola and yellow peas have cut off a crucial market, leaving farmers with few places to turn to. “China accounts for about 87% of the yellow pea market along with the U.S. and India,” meaning farmers now face a near-total lockout.

  • India’s on-again, off-again tariffs on pulses add another layer of uncertainty, leaving Canadian farmers with few viable alternatives.

Farmers are scrambling for alternatives

  • “Growers are penciling in right now, trying to figure out what’s going to provide them the best return,” Reich said.

  • Farmers could pivot to other crops, but in practice, it’s not that simple. “It’s not easy to just flip commodities,” he explained.

  • Farmers are “scrambling” to adjust before the next planting season.

Deferred investments, shrinking profitability

  • Some canola crush plant investments were already deferred a couple of years ago due to ongoing challenges with the Chinese marketplace and the cost of construction.

  • Production facilities being built today are going to continue, and existing facilities will continue operating, but margins are getting tighter.

  • Farmers are weighing whether to cut back production, reduce costs, or even scale down their operations altogether.

Fear of stranded shipments

  • China’s anti-dumping tariffs on canola seeds can come soon, adding to the threat.

  • That risk makes exporting to China a high risk. If canola seed shipments hit the waters, the Chinese “can slap on a tariff tomorrow.” That uncertainty alone is enough to spook exporters and depress prices.

  • This feels different from the dispute with China in 2019 that was more restricted to a few companies over “dockage concerns,” and quality issues.

Backdoor trade routes

  • In the past, when China restricted direct imports, Canadian canola still made its way there—through other markets.

  • “There will be other South Pacific Asian countries that’ll take the product and flip it over to China.” But those countries will try to secure the goods at a discount.

  • In addition, building trade relationships with new markets takes time. It’s not simply about switching markets from one to another (e.g., from China to the Philippines).

Other crops are also facing challenges

  • Pulse crop (e.g., lentils) are also facing challenges, particularly due to tariffs from India. This adds pressure to the profitability of these crops, with farmers having to navigate changing trade policies, especially when tariffs are applied or removed unpredictably.

Who will replace Canadian canola?

  • In the short term, other countries such as Australia can substitute Canadian canola, but Canada’s product is generally seen as highly reliable and high-quality.

  • As supply and demand dynamics shift, other countries may adjust their crop rotations to meet market needs.

  • Billions of dollars have been invested in Western Canada in canola capacity and crush capacity. There’s a lot of investment at stake in canola to “just let it go away,” Reich said.

The need for stronger government engagement

  • While farmers often prefer minimal government intervention, strong trade agreements are essential in resolving issues like tariffs or trade restrictions.

  • Canada’s government should ensure robust trade relations with key partners (China, the U.S., India) to reduce barriers, Reich recommended.

  • Saskatchewan, for instance, has set up nine offices abroad to facilitate smoother trade relations and reduce friction.

  • Canadian agriculture needs to have strong representation globally, not just through trade agreements, but through actual presence and ongoing diplomatic engagement.

  • Government investments are needed to improve infrastructure to boost interprovincial markets and move products west-to-east.