
-
Expanding immigration targets to address an aging demographic and meet short-term labour market needs has led to a widening gap between workers’ skills and the abilities needed to address long-term structural labour shortages. -
Employment from temporary work permit holders including international students is concentrated in sectors with low-skilled occupations, which reduces the incentive for businesses to innovate and invest in labour-augmenting or -saving technology. -
Canada’s two-step pathway to apply for permanent residency needs greater oversight to ensure the system isn’t being abused by educational institutions and applicants. -
The stress on infrastructure and social services needs to be addressed to improve economic outcomes for immigrants and their surrounding communities. -
Canada’s Comprehensive Ranking System needs to be updated to prioritize economic immigrants with higher predicted earnings.
Expanding immigration targets
The push by the federal government to increase immigration to offset the impact of an aging demographic has been successful in strengthening the labour force in the near term. Canada’s population grew by a substantial 3.3% in the 12 months to July 2023—the highest rate in more than six decades. The rise was driven almost entirely by in-migration as the federal government raised immigration targets for permanent residents.
A steady stream of immigrants is needed as more than 500,000 Canadian baby boomers hit retirement age—65—annually. Natural population growth is falling to the point where by 2030, overall population growth is expected to be fueled entirely by immigration.
Meeting short-term labour market needs
Mismatch between skills and labour market needs
The longer-term benefits of the abundantly available labour are also not clear as shortages in multiple fields, primarily healthcare and skilled trades, remain significant despite the increase of workers. Almost half (46%) of projected structural labour shortages are in occupations that don’t require a university or college education. That indicates the skill sets that international students are studying do not match well with the anticipated longer-term structural needs of the jobs market. International students at colleges and universities are overrepresented in business management and STEM fields and underrepresented in the skilled trades and healthcare. While some healthcare and skilled trade workers from other countries obtain temporary work permits and professional licenses, they represent a disproportionately small number of employed temporary residents.The role of Canada’s ‘two-step’ immigration system
Canada’s immigration system is heavily reliant on its “two-step” immigration program that allows international students to eventually apply for permanent residency. In 2018, almost 60% of economic stream immigration applicants had Canadian work experience, indicating that the majority of permanent immigrants were drawn from the pool of temporary residents.ii Strains on infrastructure and the changing labour market suggest Canada needs to broaden the potential ways for newcomers to immigrate. Graduation from designated schools automatically qualifies international students for a PGWP, allowing them to gain valuable work experience and better qualify for permanent residency. The two-step pathway also suits post-secondary institutions, including many contending with a funding squeeze amid flat real provincial funding and declining or frozen domestic student tuition fees. Many universities and colleges rely on the higher tuition fees from international students to cover funding gaps—even though students from other countries represent less than a fifth of university enrolments in Canada. Still, they account for a third of tuition fees. There’s been a particular emphasis on cracking down on “puppy mill” schools—for-profit private career colleges and similar institutions that the government has deemed as not offering a legitimate student experience while churning out diplomas. Private colleges, some in partnership with public colleges, have increasingly targeted international students as a lucrative source of revenue. This has led to negative outcomes for students and their surrounding communities.Strain on housing and social services
Government response to the challenges
A series of changes and updates have been announced by the federal government in an attempt to reel in a ballooning non-permanent resident population and regain greater oversight into newcomers entering the labour market. In January, the federal government implemented a cap on the total study permits to be issued over two years—limiting it to 364,000—roughly half the number of permits issued in 2023. The government also implemented stricter financial requirements for foreign students applying, upping the minimum capital requirement from $10,000 to more than $20,000 to ensure students have enough of a cushion to support their needs while studying. Work visas for spouses of undergraduate international students will also no longer be issued, and students studying at private colleges will no longer be eligible for the PGWP in an attempt to address potential loopholes in the system. However, the government will have to go beyond these initial steps to update the immigration system in order to ensure both the economy and newcomers can once again prosper from the benefits of immigration. Policymakers should examine other streams of non-permanent residents—like the Temporary Foreign Worker and International Mobility Programs—where numbers have also ballooned. They must address housing shortages on and surrounding campuses and update the selection process for permanent residents by streamlining the number of pathways available to prioritize candidates with the highest predicted earnings.Here are recommendations that could help keep the immigration system on track to meet the country’s needs
The current CRS, developed in 2015, has selection criteria focusing on factors that include language proficiency, age, and education level. Applicants are, periodically, invited to apply for permanent residency based on a set ranking score cutoff. Higher immigration targets have meant reaching deeper into the pool of applicants to meet those targets. The cutoff scores have been lowered in order for more permanent residents to be selected from the process.
The CRS should be updated and streamlined to prioritize economic immigrants with the highest level of predicted earnings. Focusing on higher-earning immigrants can help improve economic outcomes for newcomers as well as encourage businesses to innovate or make labour-augmenting investments to overcome the shortage of low-skilled workers.
Universities and colleges should do more to provide work opportunities and increase job readiness for international students. Federal policy needs to remove or alter the requirement that international students state they do not intend to remain in Canada after graduation. Prospective students must indicate they do not intend to stay beyond their study permit, even though programs like the PGWP are designed for them to do so. This would help post-secondary institutions better create school-work pathways for international students. In addition, education for employers on the rules and benefits of hiring international students needs to be improved.
More labour market and language experience during studying would help temporary residents gain permanent residency faster and improve their prospective post-immigration earnings. International students are currently excluded from many work-integrated learning opportunities.
For more, go to rbc.com/thoughtleadership.

Download the Report
DownloadContributors:
Benjamin Richardson, Researcher
Cynthia Leach, Assistant Chief Economist
Rajeshni Naidu-Ghelani, Managing Editor
Related Reading
- ihttps://www.rbc.com/en/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2024/11/CLEF-058-2023.pdf
- iihttps://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11-626-x/11-626-x2020010-eng.htm
- iiihttps://www.rbc.com/en/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2024/11/san2021-21.pdf
This article is intended as general information only and is not to be relied upon as constituting legal, financial or other professional advice. The reader is solely liable for any use of the information contained in this document and Royal Bank of Canada (“RBC”) nor any of its affiliates nor any of their respective directors, officers, employees or agents shall be held responsible for any direct or indirect damages arising from the use of this document by the reader. A professional advisor should be consulted regarding your specific situation. Information presented is believed to be factual and up-to-date but we do not guarantee its accuracy and it should not be regarded as a complete analysis of the subjects discussed. All expressions of opinion reflect the judgment of the authors as of the date of publication and are subject to change. No endorsement of any third parties or their advice, opinions, information, products or services is expressly given or implied by Royal Bank of Canada or any of its affiliates. This document may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of certain securities laws, which are subject to RBC’s caution regarding forward-looking statements. ESG (including climate) metrics, data and other information contained on this website are or may be based on assumptions, estimates and judgements. For cautionary statements relating to the information on this website, refer to the “Caution regarding forward-looking statements” and the “Important notice regarding this document” sections in our latest climate report or sustainability report, available at: https://www.rbc.com/our-impact/sustainability-reporting/index.html. Except as required by law, none of RBC nor any of its affiliates undertake to update any information in this document.


