Skip to main content
RBC Thought Leadership Climate Action Climate Crunch: How to fast-track $350B worth of energy projects
Climate Action

Climate Crunch: How to fast-track $350B worth of energy projects

Why (almost) everyone’s hating on the Impact Assessment Act

Read time 6 minutes

Issue #10

  • Why (almost) everyone’s hating on the Impact Assessment Act

  • Natural gas is the sector’s emission-busting star

  • Tracking the Trump train. Plus, the big one set to come April 2!

Hot takes

➔ Natural gas is Canadian oil and gas sector’s emission-busting star. The subsector’s emissions have fallen 30% since 2005, the steepest drop within the wider oil and gas sector, according to the latest National Inventory Report. Canada’s total greenhouse gas emissions fell 8.5% in 2023 (from 2005 levels)—its lowest level in 27 years. Electricity led the declines among sectors with a 58% drop compared to 2005, while oil and gas was the laggard with emissions up 7%. That was mostly due to the oilsands, which saw emissions jump 143%, even as the rest of the sector (including pipelines, refining and conventional oil) saw a 25% drop.

➔ Ontario could be home to North America’s first cobalt sulphate refinery. Ottawa intends to provide $20 million in funding to Toronto-based Electra Battery Materials to transform its Temiskaming Shores facility into a cobalt sulfate refinery—the continent’s first. The funding adds to the $20 million grant Electra secured from the U.S. Department of Defense last September, as Washington looks to loosen China’s grip on the global cobalt market. South Korea’s LG Energy Solution will purchase 80% of the refinery’s output, aimed at facilitating the production of around one million EVs. The refinery is part of Electra’s wider ambition, which includes building a battery recycling refinery adjacent to its cobalt refinery. Electra is also eyeing a cobalt sulfate facility in Bécancour, Quebec, and a nickel sulfate plant.

Further reading: The New Great Game: How the race for critical minerals is shaping tech supremacy

➔ Greenpeace is facing an existential crisis. North Dakota jury ordered the environment group to pay US$660 million in damages for leading protests against Energy Transfer’s Dakota Access oil pipeline in 2016-17. The eco-group, which traces its roots to Vancouver back in 1971, could face bankruptcy, ending more than 50 years of activism. The ruling has had a chilling impact on environmental scrutiny by non-governmental groups, but Greenpeace has vowed to fight on.

➔ The great American billionaire climate retreat is underway. The Bill Gates-backed  Breakthrough Energy’s laid off dozens of staff involved in solving climate issues, highlighting the crumbling fight against climate change. It follows fellow billionaire Jeff Bezos’s Earth Fund halting funds for climate projects. Presumably, both are reactions to the U.S. government dismantling several key climate policies. Deep-pocketed philanthropic support and funding for climate initiatives was supposed to ride out political ebbs and flow—instead, it’s been like a weather vane—changing direction at the first sign of shifting winds.

How to fast-track $350B worth of energy projects

Sensing an opportunity, 14 oil and gas executives wrote to Canada’s major political parties—that are now in campaign mode—to “Build Canada Now,” notably oil and gas pipelines and liquefied natural gas export terminals. That playbook could well extend to all kinds of other infrastructure, including mining and clean energy projects.

What stood out from the industry’s five recommendations? A call to overhaul and simplify the Impact Assessment Act. Industries and provinces have railed against the IAA over its short existence and even the Supreme Court has problems with parts of it.

Critics say the IAA, in its current form, intrudes into areas of provincial jurisdiction and injects uncertainty as it covers many social factors beyond environmental effects, leading to project delays.

With Canadians in the mood to build big projects again, billions in capital can be unlocked quickly if the IAA and myriad other provincial and federal permitting rules can be streamlined. The Major Projects Inventory counts 231 energy projects valued at $351 billion energy that are either in review, planning or proposal stage, according to Natural Resources. Add several billion worth of projects that are twinkles in the eyes of corporate executives, and we could be looking at capital north of $400-billion ready to be pledged or deployed.

Also read John Stackhouse’s take on the industry’s 5 recommendations on accelerating project building in Canada.

Trump Tracker

Action # 1: Executive order. President Trump invoked the Defense Production Act to ramp up domestic production of critical minerals and curb China’s resource dominance.

Upshot: Facilitates financial support and streamlines permitting processes to boost domestic mining industry. The U.S. has been scrambling to secure critical minerals, including reportedly eyeing Canada’s resources, Greenland’s riches, and minerals deals with Ukraine.

Action # 2: The Environmental Protection Agency cancelled US$20 billion for clean energy projects being developed by non-profits and community organizations.

Upshot: Implemented. The Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund created under the Inflation Reduction Act, was aimed to leverage green banks and community lenders to propel private capital investment into clean energy projects. EPA cancelled the grants amid concerns over lack of oversight.

Action # 3: Marine archaeological resources rules eased.

Upshot: Implemented. The move aims to cut red tape and accelerate America’s “Energy Dominance” ambition. The original rules required offshore oil and gas developers to conduct archaeological survey and report any new oil and gas activities that could disrupt the seafloor.

Action # 4: Reciprocal tariffs set for April 2.

Upshot: Announcement to come. They will be part of a slew of trade orders and actions that would hit Canada and the rest of the world, apparently on a sliding scale. Some Washington insiders think some key industries may be spared—for now.

RBC Briefings

Insights from RBC analysts that straddle climate, trade, economy—and everything in between.

ICYMI

Curated by Yadullah Hussain, Managing Editor, RBC Climate Action Institute.

Climate Crunch would not be possible without John StackhouseMyha Truong-ReganSarah PendrithFarhad PanahovLisa AshtonShaz MerwatVivan SorabCaprice Biasoni and Frances Dawson.

Have a comment, commendation, or umm, criticism? Write to me here (yadullahhussain@rbc.com)

Climate Crunch Newsletter

This article is intended as general information only and is not to be relied upon as constituting legal, financial or other professional advice. The reader is solely liable for any use of the information contained in this document and Royal Bank of Canada (“RBC”) nor any of its affiliates nor any of their respective directors, officers, employees or agents shall be held responsible for any direct or indirect damages arising from the use of this document by the reader. A professional advisor should be consulted regarding your specific situation. Information presented is believed to be factual and up-to-date but we do not guarantee its accuracy and it should not be regarded as a complete analysis of the subjects discussed. All expressions of opinion reflect the judgment of the authors as of the date of publication and are subject to change. No endorsement of any third parties or their advice, opinions, information, products or services is expressly given or implied by Royal Bank of Canada or any of its affiliates. This document may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of certain securities laws, which are subject to RBC’s caution regarding forward-looking statements. ESG (including climate) metrics, data and other information contained on this website are or may be based on assumptions, estimates and judgements. For cautionary statements relating to the information on this website, refer to the “Caution regarding forward-looking statements” and the “Important notice regarding this document” sections in our latest climate report or sustainability report, available at: https://www.rbc.com/our-impact/sustainability-reporting/index.html. Except as required by law, none of RBC nor any of its affiliates undertake to update any information in this document.

Important Notice Regarding Information on this Website and Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

The information on this website is intended as general information only and does not constitute an offer or a solicitation to buy or sell any security, product or service in any jurisdiction; nor is it intended to provide investment, financial, legal, accounting, tax or other advice, and such information should not to be relied or acted upon for providing such advice. Nothing herein shall form the basis of or be relied upon in connection with any contract, commitment, or investment decision whatsoever. The reader is solely liable for any use of the information contained herein, and neither Royal Bank of Canada (“RBC”, “we”, “our” and “us”) and its subsidiaries nor any of RBC’s affiliates nor any of their respective directors, officers, employees or agents shall be held responsible for any direct or indirect damage arising from the use of any information contained herein by the reader.

From time to time, we make written or oral forward-looking statements within the meaning of certain securities laws, including on this website, in filings with Canadian securities regulators or the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, and in other communications. Such statements are subject to our caution regarding forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements on our website include, but are not limited to, statements relating to our economic and sustainability related objectives, vision, commitments, goals and targets as well as potential events and actions. By their very nature, forward-looking statements require us to make assumptions and are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties, which give rise to the possibility that our predictions, expectations or conclusions will not prove to be accurate, that our assumptions may not be correct, and that our objectives, vision, commitments, goals and targets will not be achieved. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on these statements as a number of risk factors – many of which are beyond our control and the effects of which can be difficult to predict – could cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements. ESG (including climate) metrics, data and other information contained on this website are or may be based on assumptions, estimates and judgements. For cautionary statements relating to the information on this website, refer to the “Caution regarding forward-looking statements” and the “Important notice regarding this report” sections in our latest sustainability report, available at: https://www.rbc.com/our-impact/sustainability-reporting/index.html.

Except as required by law, none of RBC nor any of its affiliates undertake to update any information on this website.

All expressions of opinion on this website reflect the judgment of the authors as of the date of publication and are subject to change. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the information or expressions of opinion presented herein and they should not be regarded as a complete analysis of the subjects discussed. No endorsement of any third parties or their advice, opinions, information, products or services is expressly given or implied by RBC or any of its affiliates.

All references to websites are for your information only. The content of any websites referred to on this website, including via website link, and any other websites they refer to are not incorporated by reference in, and do not form part of, this website.  This website is also not intended to make representations as to sustainability-related initiatives of any third parties, whether named herein or otherwise, which may involve information and events that are beyond our control.