Skip to main content

TL Title

tl-title

Sometimes, it seems, revolutions can be described in haste.

While the onslaught of Massive Open Online Courses back then seemed like a death knell for traditional learning, mass online learning has struggled in its infancy, while demands for colleges and universities has never been greater.

Now that educators are settling in for the long haul of disruption, they’re discovering that technology and teaching go hand in hand. American MOOCs — led by Coursera and Udacity — are turning to pay models, more rigorous standards and better links with established schools. And post-secondary institutions are breaking down their own walls, equipping students, and teachers, with the power of technology to personalize learning, speed up instruction and reach the critical scale needed to amass enough data to make even greater leaps in the quality of education.

The latest #RBCDisruptors, featuring edtech pioneer John Baker and York University president Rhonda Lenton, asked if the post-secondary model is broken. The answer: in places. And it can be fixed.

Baker, who is the founder and CEO of D2L, a digital learning platform, believes the model can be improved dramatically through new ways of teaching and learning. Lenton, who took over the top job at York this summer, feels that while the model is not broken, it needs to change and evolve, which she argues, is already happening.

“Incremental change,” she said, “is happening but we are not yet seeing fundamental change.”

Here are some of the tougher issues they’re taking on:

Technology as Teacher

Like practically every other sector, technology is increasing its presence in the classroom, helping to personalize the learning experience by providing better ways of engaging students and enabling them to learn better.

Baker noted that instructing all students at the front of a classroom makes it very difficult to personalize to individual needs — such as tailoring lessons and giving real-time feedback.

Baker, who founded D2L while in his third year of studies at the University of Waterloo, also said that technology makes learning accessible to the blind, deaf and visually impaired, allowing them to move through learning as quickly as everyone else in the class. It also provides predictive data to understand a risk of a student dropping out of a class, by allowing the teacher to identify the warning signs early on, and uses AI to reach out to the student with personalized interactions.

Experience as Educator

Lenton emphasized that the term ‘experiential education’ (EE) cannot be narrowly defined. EE requires an entirely different partnership model between higher education and outside sectors, and should include public sector and non-profit organizations, not just businesses.

“The day of the ivory tower university is long gone,” said Lenton. What she predicts will happen is an increasing fluidity of campuses and outside sectors working together to shape the curriculum.

“York University has in fact made a commitment that over the next five years, every single program will have an EE component,” she said.

Flipping the Classroom

Rather than students spending all of their time in the classroom with an instructor at the front, they now can get the materials online, and use the class time to work together and apply their learnings. Think less one-to-many lecturing, and more using the physical classroom space to work collaboratively.

Baker believes that less time spent learning in the classroom is a big improvement on how the traditional model works, as time is our most precious commodity.

Campus of the Future

Both agreed that physical space will always play a large role in student experience.

“The one thing students don’t want to lose is the face-to-face opportunity to work together,” said Lenton.

Baker predicts that in the next five years, 50% of students’ course load will be done online, and universities may not need to build a new building every time they add thousands of new students. “It gives universities the ability to scale,” he said.

The Value of Education

Lenton, a first-generation student from a family of five siblings, always understood the incredible opportunity that higher education affords, in giving access to a research-intensive experience, and allowing one to realize their full potential.

“University graduates do very well,” she said, pointing out that 91% of university graduates are employed within three years of graduation, and that 86% of students are in an occupation related to their career.

Income-wise, Lenton noted, university graduates earn about $1 million more over their lifetime than college graduates, and about $1.5 million more than someone with a high school education.

From Courses to Competencies

Baker believes the largest opportunity in education is a shift to the outcome-based model for learning. This means moving away from “seat times” and pass/fail measures, and much more towards a competency-based model.

“When you graduate university you no longer are going to say, ‘I took this course and this program’, but, ‘I have these skillsets, I can think critically, here’s my research ability, and here’s my portfolio of all the work that I’ve accomplished’. That language is consistent with what you’re going to see later in life.”

Lenton added that universities are about providing students with transferable skills that will allow them to be flexible and adaptable to the fact that careers are changing constantly.

Disruption for Good?

“We really don’t see disruption as a negative. We see disruption as an opportunity to be embraced,” said Lenton.

Baker concurred, “sometimes we think about disruption as this painful thing we have to go through, and sometimes it is. But it’s also probably the single biggest opportunity in front of our educational institutions, and I can’t think of a bigger market opportunity for them to pursue than going through this transformation.”

 

TL Title

tl-title

What Is the Single Biggest Change You Have Seen in Post-Secondary Education Over the Past Decade?

Rhonda: By far, the biggest change has been the disruptive change of technology. Technology has changed the way we share information, how we collaborate on research, and it shapes our priorities. Technology has also facilitated and enhanced the globalization of education, and given the increased focus on international education and international opportunities; as a post-secondary institution in Toronto – Canada – our diversity is a strength. John: The biggest shift has been the shift to digital, to online education. Today’s post-secondary students live an “on demand” life, whereby they can access almost any kind of content – either music, videos, books – on their own time and in their own place. That means that the ability to learn and study is not necessarily accommodated any longer by a traditional model of regularly scheduled, in-class, daytime classes, but more of an “anytime/anywhere” access to the information, the labs, and the profs.

Will the University Campus Still Be Recognizable in 20 Years? Will There Even Be Campuses?

John: We believe that the physical university campus that we know of today will still have its place, but it will evolve, and may not be the norm as we know it today. Given that more and more learning is moving online, for example, there will be far fewer in-person lectures. While gathering for purposes of a shared experience is incredibly valuable on many levels, whether it is to learn, go to a live concert, see a play, or gather in peaceful demonstration, the old model of everyone attending a class at the same time on the same day just doesn’t match with the trends we’re seeing around the world for a personalized, learner-centric model that delivers the content in a much more flexible way to the learner. Rhonda: While the days of the ivory tower are gone, we still value face to face connection and in-person learning experience. We are in a time of transformative change – including the physical spaces that support higher education, but I see more growth, integrated technology, and improved access to information as complementary to our increasing focus on experiential education and the high demand for hands on learning experiences from both students and employers.

Do You Believe in Mandatory Coding Classes for Elementary School Children?

Rhonda: Higher education must keep pace with the fast changing demands of today’s society. I am a sociologist and an educator, passionate about teaching and learning. I believe k-12 curriculum must also change and adapt to ensure students have the basic skills needed to succeed. John: Coding is another form of literacy – in this case, digital literacy. And digital literacy provides a core foundation for so many of the tools we use today, and will use tomorrow. This doesn’t mean everyone has to become a coder, but learning the fundamentals will help people speak the language of the future. And, importantly, including it for all kids, girls and boys, will help fill the “top of funnel” pipeline problem for girls getting into STEM programs. Coding will teach kids the competencies and skills demanded for the future world of work, including critical thinking and problem solving. Those are lifelong skills that everyone needs.

TL Title

tl-title

https://youtube.com/watch?v=FPAtJBUfwUM%3Frel%3D0

our stories

Videos that showcase Canadian entrepreneurs changing the world. Learn and be inspired.

RBC has joined forces with the C100 to share stories of Canadian entrepreneurs and our connections with Silicon Valley. “our stories” is your inside track on what it takes to succeed as a global player. RBC and C100 will be sharing videos that showcase Canadians changing the world, provide real-life stories of successes (and failures) and advice on how to succeed as an entrepreneur.

RBC is committed to sharing Canadian technology, entrepreneurship and innovation stories to elevate the conversation at home and abroad. Sharing and highlighting content elevates the conversation around infrastructure, education, talent, regulation and resources needed for economic prosperity in Canada.

C100 is dedicated to giving back to the Canadian innovation economy and fostering the next generation of successful entrepreneurs and innovative companies in Canada. Showcasing Canadian business thought leaders in the San Francisco Bay area through storytelling sheds light on their successes, their challenges and their advice for those who are building global players based in Canada.

About the C100:

C100 is a non-profit, member-driven association of Canadian thought leaders in the San Francisco Bay Area committed to supporting and accelerating the innovation economy in Canada. The C100 represents a select group of experienced entrepreneurs, executives of leading technology companies, and venture capital investors.

TL Title

tl-title

https://youtube.com/watch?v=7eErbTFymM8%3Frel%3D0

our stories

Videos that showcase Canadian entrepreneurs changing the world. Learn and be inspired.

RBC has joined forces with the C100 to share stories of Canadian entrepreneurs and our connections with Silicon Valley. “our stories” is your inside track on what it takes to succeed as a global player. RBC and C100 will be sharing videos that showcase Canadians changing the world, provide real-life stories of successes (and failures) and advice on how to succeed as an entrepreneur.

RBC is committed to sharing Canadian technology, entrepreneurship and innovation stories to elevate the conversation at home and abroad. Sharing and highlighting content elevates the conversation around infrastructure, education, talent, regulation and resources needed for economic prosperity in Canada.

C100 is dedicated to giving back to the Canadian innovation economy and fostering the next generation of successful entrepreneurs and innovative companies in Canada. Showcasing Canadian business thought leaders in the San Francisco Bay area through storytelling sheds light on their successes, their challenges and their advice for those who are building global players based in Canada.

About the C100:

C100 is a non-profit, member-driven association of Canadian thought leaders in the San Francisco Bay Area committed to supporting and accelerating the innovation economy in Canada. The C100 represents a select group of experienced entrepreneurs, executives of leading technology companies, and venture capital investors.

TL Title

tl-title

Take employers. Across every sector, companies, governments, and non-profits take diversity as seriously as payroll, law, and marketing. It’s an important function to keep the machine well-oiled; just not to rethink the machine.

If Canada’s to become an innovation nation, diversity and inclusion will need to be part of that machine.

According to new RBC research, which surveyed 64 major Canadian employers, nearly 90% strongly believe diverse and inclusive teams make better decisions, while 66% strongly believe and another 20% agree leveraging diverse backgrounds and individuals is fundamental to their organizations’ performances. Half of respondents take diversity seriously enough to use scorecards to track their annual performance.

Yet only a handful of employers see inclusion — what you do with all that diversity — as a core part of strategy. It’s a talent tool, something to leave with HR.

The full results of our survey will be released at the 6Degrees conference on diversity, in Toronto in late September.

To understand the thinking behind the numbers, we held a roundtable this week with two dozen leading employers, ranging from Maple Leaf Foods to the City of Toronto, and several diversity experts.

One conclusion: Few Canadian firms have been able to turn diversity into inclusion. Fewer still are even thinking about how to turn inclusion into innovation.

“If diversity lies in HR, it dies in HR,” said Deanna Matzanke of the Canadian Centre for Diversity and Inclusion.

And that’s a risk, to economic growth, among other things.

Many employers are pursuing diversity for good but insufficient reasons. Attracting talent. Retaining people. Pleasing clients. In other words, not to disrupt their businesses.

And yet, the economic payoff is way more than productivity. A diverse group of engaged employees is more likely to solve a business challenge than a genius lone wolf can.

Inclusion – a squishy word for most – is about getting those employees engaged, and leveraging each other.

EY, the accounting and consulting giant, is one of the world’s more enlightened employers when it comes to inclusion and innovation. (The firm included a Muslim prayer room in its new downtown Toronto office tower.)

“If people’s minds are elsewhere, they won’t be as effective at work,” said Sadaf Parvaiz, EY’s director of inclusion.

The firm is under pressure from clients and millennial staff to promote diversity, and do something with it.

The retail giant Loblaw Cos. is figuring this out in real time as it digests the acquisition of Shoppers Drug Mart and thinks ahead to a new era of competition from the likes of Amazon. The company can’t move fast enough.

While the grocery business is as diverse as any on the frontlines, that diversity – whether it’s ethnic or gender — tends not to move up the ranks. Loblaw’s new President Sarah Davis is trying to change that, but inclusion isn’t just about getting different people together and making them feel comfortable. It’s finding a new whole that’s greater than the sum of the diverse parts.

Corus, the media and entertainment conglomerate, is looking at a very different future for its business, and trying to find ways to get diverse groups of employees to rethink it. But the company admits it’s early in the journey, and was able to get going really only after its acquisition last year of Shaw Media.

Meanwhile, one of Canada’s best new hospitals, Toronto’s Humber River, is discovering the hard way that innovation is about people more than technology. Its building and equipment – touted as North America’s first digital hospital — are among the best anywhere. But because Humber River serves one of Toronto’s poorest and least educated districts, it hasn’t hired many locals, and realizes now it lacks the diversity needed to think through the most innovative and practical ways to apply a digital hospital to the area it serves.

Among the suggestions:

Get the strategy group to make diversity and inclusion their own priority

Adopt innovation metrics to see how inclusion is paying off

Make it a central part of every leadership discussion

Promote a questioning culture, to engage the minds of the many, not just those who think they’ve got it figured out

Measure, measure, measure. Compensate accordingly. Repeat.

Ironically, Silicon Valley – so often lambasted for an abusive and exclusionary culture – has set the standard for harnessing minds and passions of the many, and calling it innovation.

Canada now has a chance to apply that disruptive thinking to diversity, by leveraging talent rather than just adding it.

As Silicon Valley leaders like to say, innovation is about multiplication, not addition. Same goes for real inclusion.

TL Title

tl-title

Alternate YouTube video with closed captioning

Here are some key qualities to look for in potential board members:

  • Experience
    Identify seasoned professionals who can add value, insight, credibility and experience to guide your company.
  • A willingness to push you
    Look for individuals who are going to challenge your ideas and strategies to help you get to the next level.
  • Specialized knowledge
    Tap individuals with unique skills to create well-rounded thought leadership around the boardroom table.
  • An understanding of the big picture
    Your board members aren’t there to get in the weeds. You want them to have a broad vision, and to be in tune with what’s happening out there in the world.
  • A network
    The best directors know lots of people—contacts that are aware of pending changes to regulations, know talent outside your circle, or have the inside scoop on office space or suppliers.
  • An ability to raise your profileThere’s great value in board members who can open doors to public-speaking opportunities, introduce you to decision-makers, and promote your brand.

When hiring a director, there’s a lot to consider. This individual will be your partner, advocate, co-strategist and a key investor in your success.

Here are some key questions to ask when hiring a director:

  • What else have you invested in?
    Explore whether there are synergies that can be leveraged between their investments.
  • Can you introduce us to your network?
    Remember, this individual’s rolodex is one of his or her most valuable contributions to your company.
  • Have you operated a startup before?
    If you only look at the financials of a startup, they don’t always make sense. The market may not exist yet, the need may not be established, and everything is new. You need someone who has been there before, and has the ability to envision a new market.

When you’re running a business, relationships are key to your success. As you scale up and even look to go public, you’ll need a board that’s behind you every step of the way, and shares your vision for the company you’ve started. Select carefully, take your time, and hire outside help if you need a professional opinion throughout this important process.

TL Title

tl-title

No wonder talent was one of the hottest topics at Go North, a brainstorming conference for entrepreneurs put on last month by Google and RBC in Toronto. There was a lot of talk about what Canada’s doing right—producing STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) grads that are the envy of the world, for one—and what companies here need to do better. Here are some of the takeaways.

What we’re doing right

Our universities are producing top tech talent

  • Canada has a highly educated talent pool, drawn from universities and institutions that produce some of the best technology graduates in the world.
  • Our schools go beyond offering some of the strongest math programs around: they’re also teaching students how to apply it—in computer science, in real-world scenarios, and for the benefit of new technology companies.

What we need to (continue to) do to succeed

Empower to retain

  • Engineers, by nature, thrive on learning. In order to retain top talent, it’s critical to empower them. Instead of saying “You need to build this,” an employer should be saying “Here’s the problem. Now solve it.”
  • Employers also need to be mindful of overprescribing. Trust your employees with the challenges you’re giving them.

Leverage Canadians’ sense of loyalty

  • Canadians have a sense of loyalty.Employees will stick with a company for years, rather than jumping from business to business, as is more common in Silicon Valley.
  • What this means for entrepreneurs: employees who joined your firm when it was a startup will often ride the wave with you instead of running for the hills (or Valley).

Hire for potential over experience

  • Talent is irreplaceable.You’ve got to find people who really have it. You can teach skills, and let them build experience with you.
  • Other things to look for? Fit, personality, aptitude, interest, energy and passion.
  • Look for people who love to solve problems—it doesn’t matter what kind. What matters: their enthusiasm for digging into a problem and their talent for finding a new solution.

Then, hire for experience

  • When you’re ready to scale up your business, identify people who have experience in larger organizations.
  • Find people who know how to take a company from a few dozen employees to a few hundred. Look for leaders who can manage product, finance, marketing and operations teams.

Diversify your employee base

  • Don’t hire only people who are like you. Actively look for diversity of background, gender, experience and age.
  • A diverse set of employees can foster a range of thought and perspective, lead to unique ideas, innovative solutions, and breakthrough experiences.

Where we need some work

Our talent pipeline needs to stay stocked

  • While our post-secondary institutions are doing a bang-up job of producing exceptional talent, Canada could do more to develop early-stage tech skills.
  • Other countries have integrated a coding curriculum into elementary programs—if Canada wants to compete, we need to introduce technology into the school system earlier, and more effectively.

Face the talent shortage head-on

  • To build a globally competitive company, it’s critical to bring talent in from around the world. Canada makes up 2% of the global population.That means we can’t build companies with just Canadians.
  • While a firm has to compete on salary, it’s also important to highlight the other benefits of living in Canada: affordable living, work-life balance, employer-employee loyalty, and an incredibly collaborative community that drives a culture of innovation.

TL Title

tl-title

Have efforts to improve gender diversity in the workplace stalled? Women are reaching the top ranks at Canadian companies in greater numbers than ever before. But men are still two to three times more likely to be in senior management positions, according to Catalyst, an organization focused on workplace inclusion. What gives?

We looked for some answers at Catalyst’s Canada Honours conference in Toronto in November, which featured four people who’ve championed women’s advancement in their own firms. They included Frank Vettese, CEO at Deloitte Canada; Carol Osler, Senior Vice-President of TD’s Financial Crimes and Fraud Management Group; Philip Grosch, a partner at PwC Canada; and Anna Tudela, VP of Diversity and Regulatory Affairs at Goldcorp. These executives made it clear that Corporate Canada, across a broad swath of industries, takes the issue of gender diversity seriously. But there’s lots more work to be done.

Here are some takeaways:

1. Recognizing Unconscious Bias Is Key

Even with policies in place to develop and promote women, they’re still under-represented, especially at the top. One problem: Unconscious bias is alive and well. At Deloitte, Vettese spearheaded the Canadian Women’s Initiative, or CanWin, to get women to see themselves as potential partners in the firm, and to help get them there. Then, when the numbers didn’t change significantly, Vettese decided to look at his own biases. “I realized I was bringing in people that looked a lot like me,” he said.

Bias took a more traditional form in Osler’s field of security. Male hiring managers looked for candidates who were tall or strong, or as she said, able to “bring him down.” Osler’s solution: take physicality out of the equation, and look for gender-neutral attributes like powers of observation.

Vettese raised another important point. Some people are biased against the idea of promoting diversity: seeing it as frivolous, or a diversion from a firm’s core business. How did Deloitte change that mindset? By baking diversity into its value proposition to clients, by making the business case that a diverse set of partners produce better ideas, and results.

2. Career advancement is not always a straight line up

Osler said she’s done well in security by taking every opportunity to learn, and by focusing on her skills. She also credited her success to another choice: not sitting still when she bumped up against her employer’s glass ceiling. After being passed over for a promotion she thought she deserved, Osler opted to leave and take a lower-paying position elsewhere. She eventually came back to the same firm, in a leading role.

Tudela sidestepped perceived barriers by taking a job at an exploration-focused mining firm for the varied experience it provided. She urged women in her field not to be afraid to take chances, like putting in a stint at a remote mining site. And if you aren’t getting promoted, don’t wait. “Sometimes, if you’re a woman, you need to be moving to find out where you want to go,” she said. That’s what took her from South America to the U.S. to an executive position at one of Canada’s largest mining companies.

3. Quota, no. Metrics, yes

Some European countries, tired of the slow pace of change when it comes to achieving gender parity in the workplace, have set corporate quotas for women in executive and board ranks. Norway has gone that route, as has Germany. So far, the results have been mixed. And the four panelists had no interest in importing the experiment. Quotas imply “a lack of merit,” Osler said.

But without hard targets, how do you bring about change? Grosch said “putting a lens” on your practices is key — meaning a firm has to take a hard look at its hiring, and employ numbers to measure success. Vettese suggested boosting engagement and flattening out management structures as a way to go.

4. Tone from the top. Action from the bottom, and everywhere else

Our panelists agreed that buy-in from a firm’s leadership is key to ensuring more women get promoted. When leaders take gender diversity seriously as a business issue, their employees are more likely to as well. But is change happening fast enough? Maybe not, especially for millennials. This generation is accelerating change by voting with their feet when they don’t see it happening fast enough, Grosch said. Regardless of gender, professionals under the age of 35 see the opportunity to strike out on their own, or to join a start-up, as a reasonable alternative to corporate frustration. For large employers, it’s not just a loss of employees, but a loss of diversity. The panelists advised companies to set an expectation for their staff, and then give everyone, regardless of level, the chance to make things happen.