{"id":26838,"date":"2026-04-22T17:11:41","date_gmt":"2026-04-22T17:11:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/?post_type=rbc_tl&p=26838"},"modified":"2026-04-22T19:32:10","modified_gmt":"2026-04-22T19:32:10","slug":"earth-day-2026-natures-riches-resources-revival-in-canada","status":"publish","type":"rbc_tl","link":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/thought-leadership\/climate-action-institute\/climate-crunch\/earth-day-2026-natures-riches-resources-revival-in-canada\/","title":{"rendered":"Earth Day 2026: Nature\u2019s Riches, Resources & Revival in Canada"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n
\n
\"Earth<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Signals<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

\u201cOur power, our planet\u201d is the global theme of this year\u2019s Earth Day. <\/strong>Indeed, clean power often lays the foundation ofa cleaner economy. New research from RBC\u2019s Jordan Brennan<\/a> <\/strong>and Farhad Panahov<\/a><\/strong> shows Canada\u2019s electricity system needs an estimated $670 billion over the next 10 years to support the energy transition. While 80% non-emitting, Canada\u2019s grid will need new capacity and modernization. For more, read the Capital Gains<\/a><\/strong> report.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Wildfires don\u2019t stop for Earth Day. <\/strong>Close to 200 wildfires were simmering away in Canada last week, just under twice<\/a> the 10-year average for this time of year. It highlights the scale of the challenge of protecting nature. As a recent RBC report<\/a> notes, ignoring nature threatens prosperity, especially as we push forward with nation-building projects. It\u2019s time to see conservation as a capital that others will be able tap into for generations to come.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The famous Fischer-Tropsch process brought us gasoline and jet fuel\u2014now it\u2019s poised to make sustainable fuels. <\/strong>Exactlya century after Franz Fischer and Hans Tropsch<\/a> revolutionized hydrocarbons, the same technique is being used to decouple hydrocarbon production from fossil-derived feedstocks, with emphasis on producing sustainable aviation fuels from carbon dioxide<\/a>. But true sustainability requires system integration with “upstream low-carbon modules such as green hydrogen and CO\u2082 capture,” said Peking University\u2019s Ding Ma in Nature<\/a>. The process is moving beyond labs, with several countries, including China<\/a>, working on low-carbon chemical manufacturing.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n

How does Canada\u2019s portfolio management compare globally?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Natural capital\u2013things like forests, clean water, fertile soil, and biodiversity\u2013is one of the most valuable assets any country has. It supports industries, protects communities, and plays a major role in climate resilience. Canada is exceptionally rich in natural capital, but when it comes to investing in and managing it, the picture is mixed\u2014especially compared to countries like the United Kingdom, Australia, and Denmark.

Canada\u2019s natural wealth is hard to overstate. The country holds about 24% of the world\u2019s boreal forest and roughly 20% of its freshwater resources. Natural resource sectors, including oil, mining, forestry, and agriculture, contribute around 20% of Canada\u2019s GDP, including their supply chains. Yet, Canada has struggled to turn natural capital into an investable asset class at scale.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lessons from around the world<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

United Kingdom: <\/strong>The U.K. has taken a more systematic approach to embed natural capital accounting into policy and planning<\/a>. Since 2012, the U.K.\u2019s Natural Capital Committee advised the government on how to measure and invest in ecosystems, which evolved into the Office of Environmental Protection in 2021. Today, the U.K. publishes official natural capital accounts that estimate the economic value of forests, rivers, and other assets\u2013an accounting tool that Canada also has at its disposal under the UN framework: System of Environmental-Economic Accounting. The U.K.\u2019s approach to economic and environmentally informed decisions is complemented by market mechanisms that can stimulate investments in natural assets, such as the Biodiversity Net Gain scheme.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Australia:<\/strong> Like Canada, it is rich in natural resources and heavily dependent on them economically for mining, agriculture, and oil and gas. However, Australia has taken a more aggressive approach to attract private investment into natural capital. Scaled infrastructure projects have been used to mobilize institutional investments, including Canadian pension funds, into long-term projects, including renewable energy development and sustainable land use. An example is the Murray\u2013Darling Basin Plan<\/a>, a $13-billion initiative to manage water resources sustainably across the country\u2019s food bowl.

Denmark:<\/strong> The Scandinavian country doesn\u2019t have Canada\u2019s vast natural resources. Instead it has focused its attention on baking environmental sustainability into tax law to make investment in sustainably managing natural resources the more economically attractive option. As a result, more than 50% of Denmark\u2019s electricity<\/a> comes from wind and solar power.

While Canada has made important commitments, it still lacks the coordinated systems of its peers. Pillar three of the Force of Nature Strategy<\/a>, Valuing Nature and Mobilizing Capital<\/em> aims to address this challenge. Starting with an Expert Taskforce on Natural Capital Accounting and Nature Financing, the federal government looks to mobilize private capital, blended with their $3.8 billion commitment for nature positive outcomes. If Canada can measure the value of its natural assets, attract more private investment, and align environmental goals with economic growth, it has the potential to turn its natural wealth into a long-term economic advantage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dive into more insights on Natural Capital: <\/strong>Unearthing Value: How nature can play a critical role in pro-growth agendas – RBC<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n

Banking on Soil<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe farmer is responsible for the soil [they] till. This natural resource will not restore itself as fast as it is depleted\u2026The farmer, therefore, needs to open a soil-savings account. It will not only conserve [their] soil, but it will return an increased income and accumulate interest.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

That quotation, pulled from a 1948 edition of RBC\u2019s Making Money by Saving Soils<\/em>, is as true today as it was when it was first written. In fact, the soil conservation conversation has been a constant among farmers long before that. Sure, things have evolved\u2014with research, big data and technology helping to uncover more about the dynamics of the ground beneath our feet. But many of the challenges of conserving soils to grow healthy crops remain the same. Read more on soil health from Lisa Ashton, the Climate Action Institute\u2019s Interim Head, at the link<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n

Conversations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n