{"id":10357,"date":"2025-03-21T15:54:12","date_gmt":"2025-03-21T15:54:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/?post_type=rbc_tl&p=10357\/"},"modified":"2025-05-09T06:10:13","modified_gmt":"2025-05-09T06:10:13","slug":"power-play-assessing-canadas-electricity-advantage-in-u-s-trade-talks","status":"publish","type":"rbc_tl","link":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/thought-leadership\/the-trade-hub\/power-play-assessing-canadas-electricity-advantage-in-u-s-trade-talks\/","title":{"rendered":"Power play:\u00a0Assessing Canada\u2019s electricity advantage in U.S. trade talks"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n
\n

How dependent is the U.S. on Canadian electricity to power its homes and industries? Could electricity serve as a point of leverage in Ottawa\u2019s trade negotiations with Washington?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

These questions emerged after Ontario Premier Doug Ford imposed a 25% surcharge on its electricity exports to the U.S. border states of New York, Michigan and Minnesota\u2014only to scrap it after Washington threatened to double tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum. Electricity flowing between Canada<\/a> and the U.S.<\/a> are exempt from tariffs under USMCA, which explains why the Ontario government imposed a surcharge on electricity exports, a de facto export tax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While Ontario\u2019s threat has died down\u2014for now\u2014, the episode highlights the significance of Canadian electricity in cross-border trade dynamics. We shed some light on the continental power trade flow and whether electricity could be a card worth playing in Ottawa\u2019s negotiations with Washington.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Powering the U.S.<\/h5>\n\n\n\n

Canadian electricity exports to the U.S., by state (2024)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Source: Analysis of Statistics Canada data by RBC Thought Leadership<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Four provinces dominate<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Last year, Canada sent 35 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity to the U.S.\u2013that\u2019s less than 2% of total U.S. electricity generation\u2014adding $3.4 billion to the Canadian economy. But some states are more dependent on Canadian power than others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The movement of electricity within the continent follows a north-south axis, mirroring the broader trade pattern for physical goods. Four provinces dominate the Canada-U.S. electricity trade\u2013Quebec, Ontario, British Columbia and Manitoba, accounting for 86% of exports.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Until 2022, Quebec had been the largest exporter, with one-third of Canada\u2019s electricity exports originating from its border. While it has been surpassed by Ontario recently, that\u2019s more a function of lower hydroelectric power output in Quebec due to droughts, and not a surge in the terawatt-hours (TWh) Ontario sends down to neighbouring states.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And it\u2019s not entirely a one-way traffic. Occasionally, U.S. power surges back into Canada, with the above-mentioned four provinces also the biggest beneficiaries of these imports, accounting for 95% (21 TWh) of all U.S. electricity imports, especially in times of drought. British Columbia is the biggest buyer of American electricity, accounting for 57% of imports. Controlling for drought conditions and B.C.\u2019s supply shortage\u2014which will be resolved once the Site C hydroelectric dam runs at full capacity later this year\u2014, Canada\u2019s annual reliance on U.S. power would be 10 times smaller to around 2 TWh.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Canada Provides the U.S. with Enough Electricity to Power 3.4 Million Homes Annually<\/h5>\n\n\n\n

Provincial breakdown of electricity trade (2024)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

*Numbers based on the power consumed by the average American home annually.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Source: Analysis of Statistics Canada data by RBC Thought Leadership<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Maine and Minnesota are most dependent on Canada<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Electricity as a bargaining tool in trade negotiations depends on the province\u2019s market share in various U.S. jurisdictions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While New Brunswick only accounted for 11% of Canadian electricity exports in 2023, the 5.5 TWh of power accounted for 44% of Maine\u2019s power needs. When imports from Quebec and Newfoundland are added to the mix, Maine\u2019s dependence on Canadian electricity jumps to 64%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similarly, Manitoba provided 13% of Minnesota\u2019s electricity needs in 2023, a figure that\u2019s expected to grow this summer. The Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO), which oversees transmission in several Midwest states including Minnesota, is anticipating a supply shortfall due to a confluence of events: the retirement of coal-fired power plants, growing demand, and slower than anticipated new generation assets coming online1<\/sup>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sourcing additional power from neighbouring system operators, Southwest Power Pool and PJM Interconnection are limited, as the grids operated by these systems operators are also facing a similar challenges2<\/sup>. That could leave Minnesota more reliant on Manitoba\u2019s grid.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A weak hand?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

For Quebec and Ontario, electricity is a weak hand to play. While Ontario supplies 6% of Michigan\u2019s electricity needs, much of it is pushed out to neighbouring states, mainly Ohio and Indiana. New York, meanwhile, is reliant on Quebec and Ontario for 6% of its power.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Could the U.S. states easily switch to alternatives if Canada slaps new surcharges? New York is part of the Northeast Power Coordinating Council (NPCC), (which also includes Quebec, Ontario) and six New England states that can emerge as viable alternative suppliers. However, by 2026 demand growth in the northeast region is anticipated to cause a supply shortfall.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A co-ordinated strategy is required for Ontario and Quebec, if electricity is to be an effective bargaining chip with the U.S. administration. That may be tough for Quebec, as Hydro Quebec has an offtake agreement with New York\u2019s independent system operator that may limit additional service level changes and charges outside of the contract.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What to watch for as trade tensions simmer<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The Ontario government says electricity surcharges remain on the table as a retaliatory measure against any future U.S. trade actions. With reciprocal U.S. tariffs expected on April 2, Ontario may once again proceed with its credible threat of imposed the surcharge\u2014as it briefly did on March 10.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A hot summer could further strengthen Ontario\u2019s case. Keeping the lights on and air-conditioning running without Canadian electricity could prove to be challenging this summer for strained U.S. state grids. And that may prove to be the ultimate power play for Ontario, and other provinces.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But rather than a blunt negotiating tool, electricity trade represents a strategic asset for Canada\u2014one that can help build deeper energy co-operation with the U.S. while ensuring stability for both economies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Myha Truong-Regan<\/strong> is Head of Climate Research, RBC Climate Action Institute.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n