{"id":3991,"date":"1975-05-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1975-05-01T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-56-no-5-may-1975-keep-it-simple\/"},"modified":"2022-11-28T00:25:49","modified_gmt":"2022-11-28T00:25:49","slug":"vol-56-no-5-may-1975-keep-it-simple","status":"publish","type":"rbc_letter","link":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-56-no-5-may-1975-keep-it-simple\/","title":{"rendered":"Vol. 56, No. 5 &#8211; May 1975 &#8211; Keep It Simple"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"layout-column-main\">\n<p class=\"boldtext\">It gives us a good feeling to escape                     out of the complexities of life into its simplicities, and                     then to find that its simplicities have solved its complexities.<\/p>\n<p> We cannot blame the advancement in science that marks our                     age for all our difficulties and entanglements. Science does,                     indeed, produce complicated devices which we may use if we                     wish, but it also supplies us with simple things that make                     life easier and better and interesting. It is, for example,                     far simpler than ever before to be clean, to keep reasonably                     healthy, and to move from place to place. These benefits,                     represented by soap, disinfectants, and vehicles of transportation,                     are products of science.<\/p>\n<p>People like to do simple things: dance, read, paint pictures,                     make bird houses, collect stamps, or trace their ancestry.                     It is when they indulge unnecessarily in projects that are                     complex that they begin to need psychiatric aid.<\/p>\n<p>A good working definition of simplicity, applicable to writing                     a letter as well as to building a hydro installation, is given                     by some engineers: <em>a simple machine has no unnecessary                     parts<\/em>. The pleasure we enjoy when we are doing a job in                     a simple way is like the feeling of well-being we get when                     we discard our heavy clothes on a hot day.<\/p>\n<p>In no other human activity is simplicity more needed than                     in the communication of ideas between people. Whether we are                     writing about a big catastrophe or a vacation trip we make                     our report easier to understand by telling the story in simple                     episodes. Simplicity in writing means that we are attuned                     to the reading level of our readers, neither puzzling them                     by expecting too much of them nor writing down to the level                     of a school primer.<\/p>\n<p>Simplicity requires accuracy. The writer of a report or                     a letter needs to do preparatory work. His information must                     be geared to what is needed, or it cannot be informative.                     It must be well-expressed or it cannot be understood.<\/p>\n<p>Elegance of language may not be within the reach of all                     of us, but plainness and directness are. Literary skill consists                     in using your ability to present a subject accurately in such                     a way that it is easily understood in the spirit in which                     you write it.<\/p>\n<p>Simplicity in writing and speaking is the outward sign of                     depth of thought. When people try to add novelty to their                     language they are led away from what is natural, and their                     words take on the look of affectation and conceit. They descend                     to the level of singers who embellish their songs by facial                     and bodily contortions.<\/p>\n<p>A good writer will not write letters or make speeches that                     are too pompous for the sort and amount of information they                     give. Some people think it is bright to be profound. They                     do not speak or write simply about simple things, but &#8220;in                     depth&#8221;. Instead of &#8220;I am glad to tell you&#8221; they write &#8220;It                     affords me great pleasure to inform you.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h3>One must know<\/h3>\n<p>Of course one must know what one is writing about. Then                     the task is easy: tell what you know so that others may understand                     it.<\/p>\n<p>What is involved in your progress from writing obscurely                     to writing plainly is that you collect knowledge, absorb it                     and digest it.<\/p>\n<p>Research does not have to be very deep in order to solve                     some problems. An art gallery set up a team to examine its                     suddenly increased attendance. What cultural force was sweeping                     the community? Why were scores of men, women and children                     visiting the gallery this year compared with the driblets                     of people who came last year? The explanation was simple and                     deflating: the gallery had added a rest room.<\/p>\n<p>If there is something that you cannot put into simple language                     you probably do not understand it or you do not have all the                     information you need. There is something still to learn.<\/p>\n<p>Many difficulties become simple merely through the process                     o! definition. In fact, the most efficient way to get to understand                     a word, a question, an assertion or an order is to analyse                     and define it.<\/p>\n<p>To be good, a definition must tell in what respects this                     subject differs from other subjects of a like nature. If you                     define a man as a biped without feathers you might be technically                     correct, but to your reader you might be referring to a plucked                     chicken.<\/p>\n<p>You can make things clearer and keep them in your mind in                     an orderly way if you classify the facts you learn, and associate                     them with similar facts already in your mind. The basis of                     classification of even a complex subject may be simple. Finger-printing,                     for example, has as its foundation the four heads of arches,                     loops, whorls and composites. Other subjects follow a progressive                     classification system, every section being broken down into                     sub-sections. Zoology, for example, has its subkingdoms, class,                     order, family, genus, species and variety.<\/p>\n<h3>Keep your thinking simple<\/h3>\n<p>You will find that you can keep your thinking simple no                     matter how involved the subject may be about which you intend                     to write or speak. Learn, first of all, what the thing is                     on which you are deliberating and shut your mind&#8217;s door to                     everything else. One of the best-known ways of getting the                     jitters is to allow a simple problem or proposition to become                     enmeshed in subsidiary matters.<\/p>\n<p>Do not try to round up all the factors, for they are unlimited.                     The introduction of topics or information that are irrelevant                     will complicate your thinking. Look for enough facts and major                     characteristics to make your point, and start writing.<\/p>\n<p>The time to think is before putting words on paper. You                     cannot divorce accurate, informative and forceful writing                     from thought. &#8220;It is only as thought becomes clear that simplicity                     is possible,&#8221; said Lin Yutang, Chinese-U.S.A. writer, but                     one may also say that it is simplicity that leads to clarity                     of thought. When you boil it down to essentials, the process                     of judgment (which is thinking brought to the point of action)                     is always a choice between two, and only two, ideas at any                     given time.<\/p>\n<p>Not all of us can follow the problem-solving method of an                     eminent engineer, though it might be helpful if we could.                     When in difficulty about some report or project he would go                     to bed and stay there until he had thought out a way of conquering                     it, even if it took two or three days. The French statesman                     Talleyrand followed the same practice, excusing his absence                     from his office on the grounds of illness.<\/p>\n<p>Keep your thinking simple. Clever ideas and ingenious plans                     and involved explanations of phenomena are all very well for                     lunch table conversation, but when we come to deciding and                     doing things we need unadorned simplicity.<\/p>\n<p>Things should be thought of as they exist, and not always                     as they ought to be or may be in some Peter Pan Never-Never                     Land. Look steadily at the worst aspect of them today and                     at the worst that can happen, and figure out what to do now                     and then. By making up your mind in advance just what to do                     in this extreme, dealing with the actual event is easy and                     simple.<\/p>\n<h3>Be precise and be yourself<\/h3>\n<p>Sometimes simplicity consists of precision. The necessity                     to make things easily understood by a hearer or a reader leads                     professional and business people into what seems to laymen                     to be excessive pains in checking the smallest details. Saying                     things simply includes saying them exactly. As a Greek philosopher                     said: &#8220;Doth a man bathe himself quickly? Then say not &#8216;wrongly&#8217;                     but &#8216;quickly&#8217;. Doth he drink much wine? Then say not &#8216;wrongly&#8217;                     but &#8216;much&#8217;.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Simplicity in living is an attribute of the true philosopher                     whose business it is to discover or establish principles.                     It pays to disinter old principles from the centuries of academic                     disputation under which they have been buried and find the                     simplicities that have been the support of mankind&#8217;s advancement.<\/p>\n<p>When you are doing this you develop poise, and that is important.                     Poise helps to keep things straightforward, and this protects                     you from running into complexity and error.<\/p>\n<p>The principles of wrongness and rightness are sometimes                     referred to as principles of common sense, because they are                     supposed to be common or universal throughout the whole human                     race. There is no substitute for common sense, although we                     must admit that some persons who boast of their &#8220;common sense                     approach to life&#8221; are merely disagreeable, obstinate and illiberal                     people.<\/p>\n<p>Common sense is not all-knowing. It is only a judge of the                     things that come under observation by ordinary people. It                     rests upon experience and acquired knowledge.<\/p>\n<p>People who are simple in their habits wish only to pass                     for what they are, and do not seek to appear what they are                     not. The Duchess in <em>Alice in Wonderland <\/em>does not seem                     to have had the knack of simplifying, but her philosophy was                     on the right track. She told Alice: &#8220;Be what you would seem                     to be &#8211; or, if you&#8217;d like it put more simply &#8211; never imagine                     yourself not to be otherwise than what it might appear to                     others that what you were or might have been was not otherwise                     than what you had been would have appeared to them to be otherwise.&#8221;                     Alice was compelled to admit: &#8220;I think I should understand                     that better if I had it written down; but I can&#8217;t quite follow                     it as you say it.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h3>Tell your story plainly<\/h3>\n<p>Tell a plain story plainly, and take pains to make everything                     you write meet this criterion. You will have noticed that                     humour is essentially simple, and while we cannot make everything                     that we write amusing we may adopt some of the humorist&#8217;s                     technique. He keeps close touch with facts, not fancies. He                     has flashes of common sense which lay our ideas about things                     alongside their realities.<\/p>\n<p>Some writing is so slow in motion and so lacking in colour                     that people will not try to take it in, but dull writing is                     not always the product of lazy thinking. Some of it is necessary.                     Legal documents are difficult to follow because they are detailed                     in order to be unambiguous. It is a good exercise to take                     a paragraph of a document, say a lease or a bill of sale,                     and try to change the words and the construction into brighter                     form without changing the meaning or leaving loop-holes.<\/p>\n<p>The sort of dullness that is to be avoided is typified by                     the muddled statement. Some persons try to explain things                     that seem most clear, and make them appear complex, as the                     Duchess succeeded in doing so thoroughly. Others think that                     they make their statements appear more profound by wrapping                     them in obscurity.<\/p>\n<p>Another cause of confusion is the use of abstract words                     without making their meaning clear in the context. Abstraction                     is an intellectual faculty by which mankind differs from other                     animals. It is a great handicap not to be able to embrace                     an abstract idea, but to be confined always to thinking about                     tangible things.<\/p>\n<p>There are people who by pursuing an abstract thought arrive                     at fundamental truths while the so-called &#8220;practical&#8221; people                     cannot get their thoughts off the ground. Dr. Hans Selye wrote                     in his Introduction to <em>From Dream to Discovery<\/em>: &#8220;In                     research, we soon learn that abstractions are often just as                     good as, or even more, effective than tangible, individual                     facts.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Abstraction is not, in this sense, the kind that gives your                     eyes that dreamy look as your mind retires from the company                     you are in to meditate on something visionary, but the abstraction                     that considers something as a general quality or characteristic                     apart from any concrete realities, specific objects or actual                     instances. For example, no one has ever seen whiteness: we                     may have seen white clouds, white sheets, white houses and                     white horses, but we never saw whiteness by itself. We abstracted                     the quality from various white objects.<\/p>\n<p>Not all people have the ability to absorb abstractions readily,                     and this imposes a duty upon the writer to make them clear.                     Examples can be read in <em>Twelfth Night<\/em>. Using the abstract                     word &#8220;concealment&#8221;, Shakespeare in an instant turns it into                     a visible worm &#8220;feeding&#8221; on a visible rose; then, having to                     use the abstract word &#8220;patience&#8221; he at once solidifies it                     in a tangible stone monument.<\/p>\n<p>We sometimes fail to communicate because of our clever ideas.                     The itch for novelty lures us into surrendering to complexity.                     Instead of writing simply 2 + 2 = 4 we set down the more learned-looking                     x + y = y + x, which means the same thing.<\/p>\n<p>It has been said by people of more gravity than understanding                     that there is a rule for everything. Style in writing is such                     a variable thing that the only fixed rule is to keep it as                     simple as possible within the requirements of the occasion.                     Good writing has shed its youthful love of pomposity, virtuosity                     and literary showmanship. Its writer has learned to write                     so that his art appears artless.<\/p>\n<h3>Make things clear<\/h3>\n<p>When you have written a letter or an article, and have enjoyed                     a rapturous reading of it, get busy simplifying it. Tune out                     the static. Everyone else&#8217;s receiver may not be tuned to receive                     the finer modulations of your message. See the essential points                     and make them stand out clearly. Give an account of happenings                     and information according to their proportionate importance.<\/p>\n<p>In the interest of keeping things simple, learn respect                     for precision. You may not make the same judgments as your                     reader, but you are obligated to state precisely what your                     judgments are.<\/p>\n<p>It is not always advisable to try to attain the simplicity                     and clearness of an advertisement. You can obscure a painting,                     a paragraph or a great thought, not by lack of light but by                     too much of it.<\/p>\n<p>There are simplicists who annoy us by making themselves                     perfectly clear about trifles. They put two dots on every                     &#8220;i&#8221; so that no one will mistake it for some other letter of                     the alphabet. This too great striving produces insipid and                     trite prose or poetry.<\/p>\n<p>People are accustomed to talking about painting and sculpture                     in terms of their beauty. Writing, too, has its aesthetic                     qualities. We can admire a paragraph by a great writer because                     of its simple construction that nevertheless conveys a rhythm                     attractive to the eye, the ear and the tongue. The plain and                     simple in writing can be as graceful as the sublime.<\/p>\n<p>There are people who avoid saying a plain word. They feel                     bound to be something more than simple in their language:                     to be pungent, witty, or ornamental. Nothing whose sole purpose                     is to convey facts should be obscured by beautification. Its                     beauty is in its plainness.<\/p>\n<p>A country&#8217;s language is a horn of plenty crammed with every                     kind of word. It may be as disorderly as a basket of laundry,                     and you must search diligently to find words so true and simple                     that they oppose no obstacle to your flow of thought and feeling.                     Simple writing is when you give your reader words that he                     understands without translating them into some other kind                     of words.<\/p>\n<p>Simplicity in writing is aided by observing these practices:                     prefer a concrete word to an abstract word; prefer a direct                     word to one that talks beside the point; use active verbs;                     prefer short words to long words. As examples, consider these                     words having for everyday use the same meaning: pay\/remunerate;                     begin\/initiate; give\/render; learn\/ascertain; try\/endeavour;                     end\/terminate; get\/acquire; buy\/purchase; about\/approximately.<\/p>\n<h3>Boil it down<\/h3>\n<p>We hear on every hand demands for brevity. We want diamonds                     and cars bigger and longer, but anything written should be                     short.<\/p>\n<p>The object of conciseness needs to be allied with that of                     making what you write complete in conveying the desired information                     in a way that is easily understood. Do not think of length                     versus shortness, but of long-drawn-out versus compactness.                     Anything more than is needed is too much.<\/p>\n<p>The prize for compactness in a business letter might be                     awarded to the tenant who received a notice of eviction from                     his landlord. He checked his rights with the municipal housing                     authority and wrote: &#8220;Dear sir: I remain. Yours truly.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Brevity in writing is not, as some people profess to believe,                     always achieved by writing short, sharp phrases that use words                     as reluctantly as a miser would in dictating a telegram. Such                     a practice does not add to the simplicity of what you write                     if the topic is a complex one, because some things cannot                     be put briefly except by being put falsely. There are many                     occasions in science and business when shortness must give                     way to accuracy.<\/p>\n<p>The rule is: eliminate everything that does not concern                     the topic or add to its interest or intelligibility.<\/p>\n<p>The material substance of what you write should be drawn                     from your total life experience, but your piece should not                     recite all that happened to you. If you are asked to submit                     a report on the state of productivity in your factory or office,                     do not seize the opportunity to tell about the difficulties                     caused by labour slowdown, shortage of material and machinery                     breakdowns. Tell simply what is asked for: what the optimum                     productivity is; how much is going through the shipping door                     in a week; how much is going into stock, and how much is spoiled.<\/p>\n<p>Over-writing is unproductive and self-defeating. During                     the Second World War the newspaper reporters with the invading                     forces had no means of sending their reports except by carrier                     pigeon. The pigeons were so overloaded that many of them fell                     back to earth.<\/p>\n<h3>Work simplification<\/h3>\n<p>To accomplish something we must take our minds off the end                     and start at the beginning. What is the simplest way to do                     this task efficiently? Two persons may argue vehemently about                     the best way to peel a sack of potatoes. The work will get                     done when some simple soul comes along and takes a potato                     out of the sack and starts peeling it.<\/p>\n<p>Methods of work are prescribed by procedures, regulations                     or instructions in one form or another. An attempt to improve                     or simplify work methods must begin by examining these instructions                     alongside the work being done. Bad habits or careless methods                     or short-cutting will make instructions ineffective.<\/p>\n<p>Here are some questions to ask about every detail of a job                     you are trying to simplify: Why is this operation necessary?                     Does it serve a useful purpose? Where, when and by whom can                     it be done most efficiently? Is everything being done that                     is necessary? Is anything being done that is not necessary?<\/p>\n<p>It is not good enough to answer the question &#8220;Why is this                     necessary?&#8221; by saying &#8220;It is our policy;&#8221; or &#8220;The manager                     wants it done this way;&#8221; or &#8220;We have been doing it this way                     for umpteen years.&#8221; That is not work simplification but lazy                     evasion of responsibility.<\/p>\n<p>So long as jobs are kept simple or broken down into simple                     parts to be tackled one by one they get done with ease. There                     is a popular opinion among certain sorts of workers that the                     harder you make your work look the better you must be working.                     If you emphasize the difficulty of a job to yourself or to                     others you are cultivating defeatism.<\/p>\n<h3>Points for managers<\/h3>\n<p>&#8220;System&#8221; and &#8220;simplicity&#8221; are related in more than sound:                     one is incomplete without the other.<\/p>\n<p>Some managers bog down in needless complexities. When a                     matter of concern is raised, the simple way to handle it has                     five steps that have proven to be efficient: find out what                     the problem is; make sure that the problem is real; start                     research; throw the information into usable form; solve the                     problem.<\/p>\n<p>It pays to make spoken or written instructions clear beyond                     doubt. If you say a thing simply people will be ready to accept                     your word, but if you enlarge upon it you open the door to                     implications that will be received with caution. To win attention,                     to get action, to gain support, talk and write in blacks and                     whites. Give orders clearly and decisively so that no one                     is left in doubt as to your intentions and requirements.<\/p>\n<p>Do not become enamoured of deep research to the exclusion                     of doing the little things that are awaiting action. Do the                     best with what is at hand. The Wright brothers did not sit                     down at a draughting table to plot the details of a world-wide                     air transport system. They built an airplane.<\/p>\n<p>Simplicity flies out the window when procrastination enters                     the door. Things that are postponed usually take on an added                     air of difficulty, and many problems that are put into a pigeon-hole                     because the solution does not present itself at once emerge                     with more problems attached to them.<\/p>\n<h3>It is smart to be simple<\/h3>\n<p>Do not be afraid to be simple. The energetic doing of little                     things in the most simple way will often lead to the accomplishment                     of big purposes. A tough problem can be tackled confidently                     by anyone who will take the trouble to resolve it into its                     simplicities.<\/p>\n<p>Acting simply does not mean concentrating upon the obvious                     and the easy. It does not mean avoiding the difficult things,                     but simplifying them and eliminating what is not necessary.                     The simplicity that makes daily life run smoothly consists                     largely in avoiding tyrannical trifles.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":79,"featured_media":0,"template":"","categories":[1],"rbc_letter_theme":[],"rbc_letter_year":[55],"class_list":["post-3991","rbc_letter","type-rbc_letter","status-publish","hentry","category-uncategorized","rbc_letter_year-55"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.2 (Yoast SEO v27.2) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Vol. 56, No. 5 - May 1975 - Keep It Simple - RBC<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-56-no-5-may-1975-keep-it-simple\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Vol. 56, No. 5 - May 1975 - Keep It Simple - RBC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"It gives us a good feeling to escape out of the complexities of life into its simplicities, and then to find that its simplicities have solved its complexities. We cannot blame the advancement in science that marks our age for all our difficulties and entanglements. Science does, indeed, produce complicated devices which we may use [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-56-no-5-may-1975-keep-it-simple\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"RBC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-11-28T00:25:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"16 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-56-no-5-may-1975-keep-it-simple\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-56-no-5-may-1975-keep-it-simple\/\",\"name\":\"Vol. 56, No. 5 - May 1975 - Keep It Simple - RBC\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1975-05-01T00:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-11-28T00:25:49+00:00\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-56-no-5-may-1975-keep-it-simple\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/\",\"name\":\"RBC\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Vol. 56, No. 5 - May 1975 - Keep It Simple - RBC","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-56-no-5-may-1975-keep-it-simple\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Vol. 56, No. 5 - May 1975 - Keep It Simple - RBC","og_description":"It gives us a good feeling to escape out of the complexities of life into its simplicities, and then to find that its simplicities have solved its complexities. We cannot blame the advancement in science that marks our age for all our difficulties and entanglements. Science does, indeed, produce complicated devices which we may use [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-56-no-5-may-1975-keep-it-simple\/","og_site_name":"RBC","article_modified_time":"2022-11-28T00:25:49+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"16 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-56-no-5-may-1975-keep-it-simple\/","url":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-56-no-5-may-1975-keep-it-simple\/","name":"Vol. 56, No. 5 - May 1975 - Keep It Simple - RBC","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"1975-05-01T00:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2022-11-28T00:25:49+00:00","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-56-no-5-may-1975-keep-it-simple\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/","name":"RBC","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"parsely":{"version":"1.1.0","canonical_url":"https:\/\/rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-56-no-5-may-1975-keep-it-simple\/","smart_links":{"inbound":0,"outbound":0},"traffic_boost_suggestions_count":0,"meta":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Vol. 56, No. 5 &#8211; May 1975 &#8211; Keep It Simple","url":"http:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-56-no-5-may-1975-keep-it-simple\/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-56-no-5-may-1975-keep-it-simple\/"},"thumbnailUrl":"","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":""},"articleSection":"Uncategorized","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"amandeepsingh"}],"creator":["amandeepsingh"],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"RBC","logo":""},"keywords":[],"dateCreated":"1975-05-01T00:00:00Z","datePublished":"1975-05-01T00:00:00Z","dateModified":"2022-11-28T00:25:49Z"},"rendered":"<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"wp-parsely-metadata\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@type\":\"NewsArticle\",\"headline\":\"Vol. 56, No. 5 &#8211; May 1975 &#8211; Keep It Simple\",\"url\":\"http:\\\/\\\/www.rbc.com\\\/en\\\/about-us\\\/history\\\/letter\\\/vol-56-no-5-may-1975-keep-it-simple\\\/\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/www.rbc.com\\\/en\\\/about-us\\\/history\\\/letter\\\/vol-56-no-5-may-1975-keep-it-simple\\\/\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"url\":\"\"},\"articleSection\":\"Uncategorized\",\"author\":[{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"name\":\"amandeepsingh\"}],\"creator\":[\"amandeepsingh\"],\"publisher\":{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"name\":\"RBC\",\"logo\":\"\"},\"keywords\":[],\"dateCreated\":\"1975-05-01T00:00:00Z\",\"datePublished\":\"1975-05-01T00:00:00Z\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-11-28T00:25:49Z\"}<\/script>","tracker_url":"https:\/\/cdn.parsely.com\/keys\/rbc.com\/p.js"},"featured_img":false,"coauthors":[],"author_meta":{"author_link":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/author\/amandeepsingh\/","display_name":"amandeepsingh"},"relative_dates":{"created":"Posted 51 years ago","modified":"Updated 3 years ago"},"absolute_dates":{"created":"Posted on May 1, 1975","modified":"Updated on November 28, 2022"},"absolute_dates_time":{"created":"Posted on May 1, 1975 12:00 am","modified":"Updated on November 28, 2022 12:25 am"},"featured_img_caption":"","tax_additional":{"category":{"linked":["<a href=\"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/category\/uncategorized\/\" class=\"advgb-post-tax-term\">Uncategorized<\/a>"],"unlinked":["<span class=\"advgb-post-tax-term\">Uncategorized<\/span>"],"slug":"category","name":"Categories"},"rbc_letter_theme":{"linked":[],"unlinked":[],"slug":"rbc_letter_theme","name":"Themes"},"rbc_letter_year":{"linked":["<a href=\"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/year\/1975\/\" class=\"advgb-post-tax-term\">1975<\/a>"],"unlinked":["<span class=\"advgb-post-tax-term\">1975<\/span>"],"slug":"rbc_letter_year","name":"Years"}},"series_order":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/rbc_letter\/3991","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/rbc_letter"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/rbc_letter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/79"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/rbc_letter\/3991\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3991"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3991"},{"taxonomy":"rbc_letter_theme","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/rbc_letter_theme?post=3991"},{"taxonomy":"rbc_letter_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/rbc_letter_year?post=3991"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}