{"id":3824,"date":"1991-07-01T01:00:00","date_gmt":"1991-07-01T01:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-72-no-4-july-august-1991-towards-better-mental-health\/"},"modified":"2022-11-27T02:23:46","modified_gmt":"2022-11-27T02:23:46","slug":"vol-72-no-4-july-august-1991-towards-better-mental-health","status":"publish","type":"rbc_letter","link":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-72-no-4-july-august-1991-towards-better-mental-health\/","title":{"rendered":"Vol. 72 No. 4 &#8211; July\/August 1991 &#8211; Towards Better Mental Health"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"layout-column-main\">\n<p class=\"boldtext\">The deinstitutionalization of the mentally                     ill has presented a challenge to all Canadians. If we are                     to improve our collective mental health, we must change our                     approach to mental illness on the way to a generally healthier                     society &#8230;<\/p>\n<p> Despite the progress made in the treatment of mental illness                     in recent years, some of our thinking about the subject is                     back in the dark ages. It was then that European bishops spread                     the doctrine that madness derived from sin. Other theologians                     claimed that mad people were possessed by demons, but nonetheless                     blamed the victims for having somehow invited the demons to                     possess them. In any case, the theory that insane people brought                     insanity on themselves gave others an excuse to despise them,                     a medieval attitude which persists to this very day.<\/p>\n<p>In a society which is supposed to care for those who are                     suffering through no fault of their own, mentally ill people                     continue to be treated callously. Perhaps this is because                     so-called &#8220;normal&#8221; people find them threatening. The same                     good, kind citizens who would help a physically-injured person                     on crutches to cross the street will hurry across the street                     themselves to get away from a mentally-ill person who is raving.                     Though the great majority of mentally disturbed persons are                     harmless, all are automatically deemed to be dangerous, an                     impression strengthened by terror books and movies which glory                     in depicting obsessed kidnappers, &#8220;homicidal maniacs&#8221; and                     other criminal psychopaths.<\/p>\n<p>When a society is prejudiced against a group whether consciously                     or not, it unfailingly makes its members into objects of ridicule.                     And now as ever, jokes about &#8220;crazy&#8221; people abound. The mentally                     ill are called facetious names like &#8220;nuts&#8221; and &#8220;loonies,&#8221;                     the latter harking back to the fact that &#8220;lunacy&#8221; was once                     thought be caused by the phases of the moon, an idea which                     originated with the ancient Romans. The jokes and jibes reflect                     another prejudicial myth , which is that mental illness can                     be a painless and even a pleasant condition. People will refer                     to a mental institution as the &#8220;funny farm&#8221; or the &#8220;laughing                     academy,&#8221; conjuring up a stereotypical picture of its inmates                     talking to themselves in blissful fantasies.<\/p>\n<p>Typical of the notion that madness is not so bad after all                     are the words of the iconoclastic essayist Logan Pearsall                     Smith: &#8220;Are there not soporific dreams and sweet deleriums                     more soothing than reason ?&#8221; Well, no &#8211; in fact, those &#8220;sweet                     deleriums&#8221; are usually either the products of misinformed                     imaginations like Pearsall Smith&#8217;s or the manic phase of manic                     depression, one of the grimmest of all mental afflictions.                     Ex-mental patients will testify that having no control over                     your mind is a very horrible condition indeed.<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps we as a society like to pretend that the mentally                     ill are happy in their state to assuage our guilt over the                     way we have treated them. For many, many years in this ostensibly                     liberal country, &#8220;normal&#8221; people stayed as far away from their                     mentally-ill compatriots as they possibly could. This was                     accomplished by locking them up out of the sight of the public.                     In pre- Confederation Canada, people who had been incarcerated                     solely for being of unsound mind were put in prisons alongside                     criminals who treated them with great cruelty. So shocking                     was their condition that it led to campaigns for the protection                     of the insane. These succeeded in having mental &#8220;hospitals&#8221;                     established across the country during the latter part of the                     19th century. But the hospitals eventually proved to be just                     as inhumane as the jails.<\/p>\n<p>Teams of mental health workers sent out to inspect Canadian                     mental institutions from 1917 to 1919 encountered appalling                     squalor, neglect and brutality. In a Manitoba asylum which                     had one doctor for 700 patients, black eyes offered evidence                     of the strong-arm methods of the attendants; and &#8220;patients                     sat in complete idleness on long hard wooden benches, many                     of them in physical restraint, staring vacantly into space,                     dejected, waiting for death to give them release.&#8221; In Saint                     John, N.B., patients were individually locked at night inside                     crude wooden coffin-like boxes. In Halifax, one team recorded,                     &#8220;We saw a scantily-clad man in a small unheated room who was                     kept there throughout the damp cold weather. When we remonstrated                     with the authorities, we were told that the insane man did                     not feel the cold.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>These reports reflect two views of the mentally ill which                     linger on in our collective subconscious. The first is the                     medieval one that they are in some way culpable for their                     troublesome state, and so deserve to be treated roughly. The                     second is that they are not quite human anyway; they do not                     &#8220;feel the cold.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>If they are not quite human, it follows that they do not                     quite qualify for the full range of human rights. For many                     years mentally- disturbed people were the victims of blatant,                     official, systemic discrimination in Canada. In some jurisdictions,                     for example, people could only be committed to institutional                     care by magistrates . Until the legal system got around to                     dealing with their cases, they languished in jails without                     having been charged, deprived of <em> habeas corpus <\/em>                     and subject to violent man-handling by guards and police.<\/p>\n<p>It may be said in defence of Canadians and citizens of other                     liberal democracies that they were not generally aware that                     their mentally-ill compatriots were being so abused by the                     system. But if they were unaware of what was happening, they                     were largely unconcerned. There was a tacit social understanding                     that people who showed clear signs of mental disturbance were                     to be &#8220;put away&#8221; in custody. No very close attention was paid                     to what happened to them in the limbos into which they disappeared.<\/p>\n<p>Ironically, putting the mentally ill effectively in quarantine                     has always hindered efforts to control the illness. As long                     as the most conspicuous of our mental health problems were                     hidden behind institutional walls, there was no compelling                     reason to tackle the more common problems around us.<\/p>\n<p>Though the predecessor of the Canadian Mental Health Association                     was called the Canadian Committee for Mental Hygiene when                     it was founded in 1918, it concentrated in its early years                     more on the pathetic plight of institutional patients than                     on &#8220;hygiene&#8221; in the sense of preventive public health measures.                     At any rate, it is doubtful that many at the time seriously                     believed that you could establish conditions that would prevent                     mental illness the way inoculation could prevent smallpox.                     It was vaguely concluded that mental illness sprang from a                     kind of bad seed, a character flaw owing to one&#8217;s heredity.                     With equal vagueness, it was popularly assumed that madness                     was pretty well incurable.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"quote\">&#8216;Shell shock&#8217; showed that anyone at all can break down under stress <\/span><\/h3>\n<p>The driving force behind the mental health movement in North                     America was a living contradiction of this theory. Clifford                     W. Beers, author of <em> A Mind That Found Itself<\/em> , had                     recovered from a severe mental breakdown. Before his book                     was published in 1908, Beers had been in and out of sanitariums                     in the United States. Beers was active in establishing mental                     hygiene societies in the U.S ., and in 1917 collaborated with                     the future general director of the Canadian Mental Health                     Association, Dr. C. M. Hincks, in organizing a mental health                     movement in Canada. The interesting story of the movement                     is told in the history of the CMHA by a later general director,                     John D. Griffin, entitled <em> In Search of Sanity<\/em> ,                     published in 1989 by Third Eye of London, Ont. We are indebted                     to Dr . Griffin and his work for many of the details herein.<\/p>\n<p>The horrors of World War I confirmed that mental disorders                     could be caused by environmental stresses in otherwise well-adjusted                     individuals. In the early months of that conflict, it was                     widely believed that severe nervous breakdowns among front-line                     soldiers were the result of concussion from exploding shells                     &#8211; literally &#8221; shell shock.&#8221; Identifying this as a psychological                     ailment brought several breakthroughs in the professional                     approach to mental hygiene .<\/p>\n<p>Chief among these was that anyone &#8211; anyone at all &#8211; can                     break down when sufficiently exposed to intense strain and                     upheaval. If they remained long enough on active service,                     the bravest and most battle- hardened soldiers would inevitably                     suffer a mental collapse from fear and fatigue. This exploded                     the time-honoured fallacy that only people with inherent character                     weaknesses were vulnerable to mental illness. It meant that                     exterior conditions had a decisive effect on whether a person                     was mentally well or ill.<\/p>\n<p>As thousands of psychiatric casualties streamed home from                     the war, mental health became a matter of widespread public                     concern for the first time in Canadian history. The practice                     of sending shell shock victims back to their home provinces                     for treatment drew attention to the unconscionable conditions                     in provincial institutions. The knowledge that strong men                     could be &#8220;wounded&#8221; psychologically as well as physically helped                     to make the fact of mental illness more acceptable and better                     recognized. Most importantly, the war and its aftermath proved                     that people with serious psychiatric conditions could recover                     and reintegrate themselves into community life.<\/p>\n<p>Still, it took the popularization of the work of Freud and                     Jung to show that there could be such a thing as mental hygiene.                     They identified the existence of neurosis, a condition which                     merges normal and deranged behaviour and stops short of its                     sufferer losing touch with reality.<\/p>\n<p>The fact that neurotic conditions could be brought under                     control by therapeutic techniques opened the conceptual door                     to preventive mental medicine. Out of the great psychiatrists&#8217;                     discoveries, later workers in the field would make a broad                     distinction between psychotic &#8220;mental disorders&#8221; such as schizophrenia,                     manic depression and dementia, and neurotic &#8220;mental health                     problems.&#8221; The latter conditions essentially arise from disturbances                     in the individual&#8217;s interaction with the environment. If the                     disturbances can be settled, the problem will go away.<\/p>\n<p>Guided partly by the theories of Freud and Jung on the influence                     of childhood on the adult mentality, the forerunner of the                     Canadian Mental Health Association initiated mental hygiene                     programs among children in the early 1930s. Studies were undertaken                     in child development, and programs launched to educate parents                     and teachers in how to encourage healthy relationships and                     instil a balanced approach to the psychological demands of                     growing up.<\/p>\n<p>As more research was done into what constitutes good mental                     health, it became clear that many of the most common psychological                     problems were problems of adaptation. Children have to adapt                     to adolescence, adolescents to adulthood, and adults to different                     conditions &#8211; being married, having children, holding and losing                     jobs, growing old , losing loved ones, and so forth. It was                     found that counselling and efforts to improve socialization                     in such situations helped to maintain sound mental health.<\/p>\n<p>Immigrants in particular have to adapt to a new way of life                     which is always strange and sometimes frightening. The attitude                     towards this group in Canadian mental health circles offers                     a telling example of how much times have changed. One of the                     major preoccupations of the mental hygiene movement in its                     early years was screening immigrants for mental unsoundness                     with a view to denying them entry or deporting those already                     admitted. In a report in 1931, a respected psychologist wrote                     that &#8220;the immigrant with a lame or crippled mind is not a                     healthy immigrant, nor is he a whole man. Canada needs whole                     men.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"quote\">Advances in science have meant that patients may now treat themselves<\/span><\/h3>\n<p>In later years the CMHA came around to an entirely different                     view of that figurative immigrant. It argued in briefs to                     the federal government that mentally ill persons should be                     permitted entry when their presence in Canada is of significant                     benefit to their families in this country, and that holding                     a deportation notice over a mentally-ill immigrant&#8217;s head                     might well impede his recovery . The association found it                     necessary to remind the government of the falsity of the assumption                     that &#8220;once a person is judged mentally ill (or &#8216;insane&#8217; in                     legal terminology) he will always be mentally ill.&#8221; It stressed                     that immigrants &#8211; or anyone else &#8211; can be treated successfully                     and go on to lead full and useful lives.<\/p>\n<p>One reason why successful treatment is more common now than                     formerly is that great advances have been made in psychiatric                     medicine. For a long time, the psychiatric field was largely                     overlooked in the allocation of public funds for staff, facilities,                     and research. It did not rank with physical medicine as a                     political priority. This was the case as recently as 1962,                     when the federal Royal Commission on Health Services presented                     a scathing critique of the discriminatory differences between                     mental and physical health care.<\/p>\n<p>In the years since, there has been an impressive increase                     in the number of psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, specialized                     social workers and other mental health professionals practising                     in Canada. Methods of treatment have greatly improved, particularly                     in the use of medication. The fact that drugs are portable                     has meant that outpatients can partially administer their                     own treatment, using the facilities of a growing number of                     community mental health clinics when necessary.<\/p>\n<p>The portability of treatment was one of the reasons for                     the historic exodus from mental hospitals throughout the 1970s                     and &#8217;80s . In the past 25 years, the number of beds in provincial                     institutions has declined by more than 75 per cent. However,                     there has not been a corresponding decline in the number of                     patients. Many are now treated in the psychiatric wards of                     general hospitals and chronic care centres instead of the                     old specialized &#8220;mental homes.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Deinstitutionalization and the integration of former mental                     patients into society is a great progressive step in the history                     of mental health care. As Health and Welfare Canada&#8217;s 1988                     discussion document <em> Mental Health for Canadians: Striking                     a Balance <\/em> pointed out, &#8220;It is quite possible for someone                     to have a mental disorder and still enjoy a considerable degree                     of mental health&#8221; &#8211; and the best place to accomplish this                     is outside of institutions.<\/p>\n<p>But, the document goes on to say, deinstitutionalization                     has not been without its dark aspects: &#8220;The closing of hospital                     beds has rarely been offset by a corresponding strengthening                     of community resources&#8230;. Some psychiatric patients who have                     been diverted or discharged from inpatient care face a life                     of deprivation, danger and neglect. Some are homeless, or                     live in social isolation or squalor. Many are forced to rely                     on family caregivers who themselves have little or no access                     to respite or other kinds of support.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>While improvements in treatment have increased the odds                     of recovery among the mentally ill, they have had no appreciable                     effect on the incidence of this type of illness. The estimated                     proportion of the Canadian population afflicted with serious                     mental disorders is about the same as ever; at least eight                     in every hundred Canadians suffer from depression badly enough                     to require treatment, and at least one in a hundred has schizophrenia.<\/p>\n<p>The incidence of mental health problems, as opposed to disorders,                     is clearly many times higher. It is hard to tell exactly how                     common they are, basically because it is hard to distinguish                     a simple aberrant personality trait from a mental problem.                     Also, these problems often go untreated or are sublimated                     in other problems such as alcohol and drug abuse.<\/p>\n<p>If statistics on suicides, family violence, child abuse,                     substance abuse and violent crime are any indication of a                     nation&#8217;s mental health, it would appear that Canada&#8217;s has                     been deteriorating lately . Since mental health problems are                     a reaction to the human environment, it is time for a hard                     critical look at the environmental circumstances in which                     they exist.<\/p>\n<p>Clearly, the pace and pressures of modern life are not conducive                     to peace of mind, with people constantly being called upon                     to adapt mentally and emotionally to often-disagreeable social                     and economic changes. Most Canadians now live in urban settings,                     where they experience an incongruous mix of loneliness and                     crowding. Putting people in solitary confinement is, of course,                     an age-old way of driving them crazy; and experiments with                     rats have shown that they quickly become deranged when they                     were exposed to the equivalent of a rush-hour traffic jam.<\/p>\n<p>In <em> Striking A Balance<\/em> , the health and welfare                     ministry called mental health &#8220;something experienced not only                     individually but collectively.&#8221; Thus just as the proper public                     sanitation facilities have an effect on an individual&#8217;s physical                     wellbeing, so the conduct of our society has an effect on                     an individual&#8217;s mental and emotional wellbeing. The document                     cites poverty as a leading contributor to mental health problems.                     Accompanied as it usually is by unemployment, poverty breeds                     feelings of worthlessness, frustration, rage, and despair.<\/p>\n<p>Other characteristics that detract from mental wellbeing                     include one&#8217;s sex (women are much more likely to suffer                    from  severe depression than men) age (youths and old people                    are  especially vulnerable to emotional difficulties) and                    ethnic  background (immigrants and natives are considered                    to be at  higher risk than others). It is instructive that                    most of these  groups are discriminated against.<\/p>\n<p>Thus a key to better national mental health is greater justice                     and equality. If the correction of injustices begins at home,                     the obvious place to start in this context is to attack discrimination                     against the mentally ill in housing, employment, and legal                     status. What is needed is public education that seeks to eliminate                     the stigma attached to mental illness and stresses the right                     of its sufferers to be treated on a level with any other human                     beings.<\/p>\n<p>This includes the right to make their own decisions and                     deal with their own problems through mutual aid groups. The                     acceptance of the mentally ill as full members of society                     calls for a change in approach to &#8220;self-determination rather                     than paternalism, autonomy and mutual support rather than                     passivity or dependence,&#8221; as the discussion paper says.<\/p>\n<p>It goes on to proclaim: &#8220;The protection and promotion of                     mental health should be a matter of compelling priority for                     every community in Canada.&#8221; It certainly should be, because                     if our glaring shortcomings in this regard are not addressed                     with multidisciplinary action, they can only get worse.<\/p>\n<p>It is not beyond Canada&#8217;s medical ability to treat mental                     disorders satisfactorily and ameliorate mental health problems                     before they develop into more serious conditions. Indeed,                     it may not be beyond our ability to find outright cures. But                     in the long run, the problems of national mental health will                     respond to only one solution . And that is to build a healthier                     society.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":79,"featured_media":0,"template":"","categories":[1],"rbc_letter_theme":[],"rbc_letter_year":[78],"class_list":["post-3824","rbc_letter","type-rbc_letter","status-publish","hentry","category-uncategorized","rbc_letter_year-78"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Vol. 72 No. 4 - July\/August 1991 - Towards Better Mental Health - RBC<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-72-no-4-july-august-1991-towards-better-mental-health\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Vol. 72 No. 4 - July\/August 1991 - Towards Better Mental Health - RBC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The deinstitutionalization of the mentally ill has presented a challenge to all Canadians. If we are to improve our collective mental health, we must change our approach to mental illness on the way to a generally healthier society &#8230; Despite the progress made in the treatment of mental illness in recent years, some of our [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-72-no-4-july-august-1991-towards-better-mental-health\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"RBC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-11-27T02:23:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"14 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rbc.com\\\/en\\\/about-us\\\/history\\\/letter\\\/vol-72-no-4-july-august-1991-towards-better-mental-health\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rbc.com\\\/en\\\/about-us\\\/history\\\/letter\\\/vol-72-no-4-july-august-1991-towards-better-mental-health\\\/\",\"name\":\"Vol. 72 No. 4 - July\\\/August 1991 - Towards Better Mental Health - RBC\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rbc.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1991-07-01T01:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-11-27T02:23:46+00:00\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rbc.com\\\/en\\\/about-us\\\/history\\\/letter\\\/vol-72-no-4-july-august-1991-towards-better-mental-health\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rbc.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rbc.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"RBC\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rbc.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Vol. 72 No. 4 - July\/August 1991 - Towards Better Mental Health - RBC","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-72-no-4-july-august-1991-towards-better-mental-health\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Vol. 72 No. 4 - July\/August 1991 - Towards Better Mental Health - RBC","og_description":"The deinstitutionalization of the mentally ill has presented a challenge to all Canadians. If we are to improve our collective mental health, we must change our approach to mental illness on the way to a generally healthier society &#8230; Despite the progress made in the treatment of mental illness in recent years, some of our [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-72-no-4-july-august-1991-towards-better-mental-health\/","og_site_name":"RBC","article_modified_time":"2022-11-27T02:23:46+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"14 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-72-no-4-july-august-1991-towards-better-mental-health\/","url":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-72-no-4-july-august-1991-towards-better-mental-health\/","name":"Vol. 72 No. 4 - July\/August 1991 - Towards Better Mental Health - RBC","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"1991-07-01T01:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2022-11-27T02:23:46+00:00","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-72-no-4-july-august-1991-towards-better-mental-health\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/","name":"RBC","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"parsely":{"version":"1.1.0","canonical_url":"https:\/\/rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-72-no-4-july-august-1991-towards-better-mental-health\/","smart_links":{"inbound":0,"outbound":0},"traffic_boost_suggestions_count":0,"meta":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Vol. 72 No. 4 &#8211; July\/August 1991 &#8211; Towards Better Mental Health","url":"http:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-72-no-4-july-august-1991-towards-better-mental-health\/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-72-no-4-july-august-1991-towards-better-mental-health\/"},"thumbnailUrl":"","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":""},"articleSection":"Uncategorized","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"amandeepsingh"}],"creator":["amandeepsingh"],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"RBC","logo":""},"keywords":[],"dateCreated":"1991-07-01T01:00:00Z","datePublished":"1991-07-01T01:00:00Z","dateModified":"2022-11-27T02:23:46Z"},"rendered":"<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"wp-parsely-metadata\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@type\":\"NewsArticle\",\"headline\":\"Vol. 72 No. 4 &#8211; July\\\/August 1991 &#8211; Towards Better Mental Health\",\"url\":\"http:\\\/\\\/www.rbc.com\\\/en\\\/about-us\\\/history\\\/letter\\\/vol-72-no-4-july-august-1991-towards-better-mental-health\\\/\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/www.rbc.com\\\/en\\\/about-us\\\/history\\\/letter\\\/vol-72-no-4-july-august-1991-towards-better-mental-health\\\/\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"url\":\"\"},\"articleSection\":\"Uncategorized\",\"author\":[{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"name\":\"amandeepsingh\"}],\"creator\":[\"amandeepsingh\"],\"publisher\":{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"name\":\"RBC\",\"logo\":\"\"},\"keywords\":[],\"dateCreated\":\"1991-07-01T01:00:00Z\",\"datePublished\":\"1991-07-01T01:00:00Z\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-11-27T02:23:46Z\"}<\/script>","tracker_url":"https:\/\/cdn.parsely.com\/keys\/rbc.com\/p.js"},"featured_img":false,"coauthors":[],"author_meta":{"author_link":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/author\/amandeepsingh\/","display_name":"amandeepsingh"},"relative_dates":{"created":"Posted 35 years ago","modified":"Updated 3 years ago"},"absolute_dates":{"created":"Posted on July 1, 1991","modified":"Updated on November 27, 2022"},"absolute_dates_time":{"created":"Posted on July 1, 1991 1:00 am","modified":"Updated on November 27, 2022 2:23 am"},"featured_img_caption":"","tax_additional":{"category":{"linked":["<a href=\"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/category\/uncategorized\/\" class=\"advgb-post-tax-term\">Uncategorized<\/a>"],"unlinked":["<span class=\"advgb-post-tax-term\">Uncategorized<\/span>"],"slug":"category","name":"Categories"},"rbc_letter_theme":{"linked":[],"unlinked":[],"slug":"rbc_letter_theme","name":"Themes"},"rbc_letter_year":{"linked":["<a href=\"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/year\/1991\/\" class=\"advgb-post-tax-term\">1991<\/a>"],"unlinked":["<span class=\"advgb-post-tax-term\">1991<\/span>"],"slug":"rbc_letter_year","name":"Years"}},"series_order":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/rbc_letter\/3824","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/rbc_letter"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/rbc_letter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/79"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/rbc_letter\/3824\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3824"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3824"},{"taxonomy":"rbc_letter_theme","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/rbc_letter_theme?post=3824"},{"taxonomy":"rbc_letter_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/rbc_letter_year?post=3824"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}