{"id":3647,"date":"1978-04-01T01:00:00","date_gmt":"1978-04-01T01:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-59-no-4-april-1978-doing-your-own-thing\/"},"modified":"2022-11-28T00:06:22","modified_gmt":"2022-11-28T00:06:22","slug":"vol-59-no-4-april-1978-doing-your-own-thing","status":"publish","type":"rbc_letter","link":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-59-no-4-april-1978-doing-your-own-thing\/","title":{"rendered":"Vol. 59, No. 4 &#8211; April 1978 &#8211; &#8216;Doing Your Own Thing&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"layout-column-main\">\n<p class=\"boldtext\"> In a curious way, the permissive society                     has placed more responsibility on young people than ever.                     And a new kind of conformity threatens to take the place of                     the old. Can the young really &#8220;do their own thing&#8221; in these                     conditions? We look at the problems of being yourself today&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;To be nobody-but-myself &#8211; in a world which                     is doing its best, night and day, to make you everybody else                     &#8211; means the hardest battle any human being can fight, and                     never stop fighting.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p align=\"right\">&#8211; Poet E. E. Cummings, in letterto                     high school editor, 1955<\/p>\n<p>In the mid-1960s a wave of disquiet swept through the middle                     classes of North America and Western Europe. Something was                     happening among the young people of the day which their elders                     could not quite understand. They had, after all, worked long                     and hard to build a society in which their offspring would                     want for very little materially. They had secured for the                     next generation a degree of political and economic freedom                     never known in the world before. And yet there were clear                     signs that a considerable and influential segment of the younger                     population was turning its back on the fruits of their labour.                     Bewildered and a little hurt, the adults asked why.<\/p>\n<p>The answer was that youth was being led by its more radical                     elements into a revolt against the seeming conformity and                     heartlessness of modern technocratic society. The majority                     never joined in fully, but enough had sufficient sympathy                     with the cause to bring about a widening of the &#8220;generation                     gap&#8221; in almost every facet of everyday life. While campus                     demonstrations, changing moral standards and drug use dominated                     the attention of the mass media, the youth movement came to                     most homes in a much less spectacular fashion. But come it                     did.<\/p>\n<p>Its most lasting effect was to create a visible division                     between the generations in tastes, attitudes and habits. If                     adults wore their hair short, young people wore theirs long.                     If adults liked their music sweet and soft, the &#8220;rock&#8221; of                     the young was harsh and strident. Many youths took a different                     attitude towards the desirability of ambition from that of                     their parents. They asked devastating questions about the                     ways of society which rarely entered their parents&#8217; minds.<\/p>\n<p>For once, the younger showed the way to the older in their                     approach to living. Under the influence of youth, adults whose                     creative impulses had formerly been held down by convention                     began to search for new ways of expressing themselves. People                     of all ages felt less constraint in their choice of clothing                     and hair styles. Though it is true that they sometimes followed                     older leaders, the young deserve much of the credit for knocking                     the stuffiness out of modern life.<\/p>\n<p>Their persistent assaults on the <em>status quo <\/em>prompted                     a reappraisal of the necessity for the canons of society which                     hitherto had been taken for granted. Many of these could not                     stand up to the test of that most potent weapon in our vocabulary:                     the word &#8220;why&#8221;. The result was a sweeping relaxation of the                     old rules &#8211; too sweeping and too great a relaxation, in the                     opinion of many. Be that as it may, society&#8217;s institutions                     were rudely nudged into allowing more freedom for people to                     lead their own lives in their own style.<\/p>\n<p>Paradoxically, this freedom has confronted the youth of                     today with an unprecedented challenge. There is nothing easy                     about living in the permissive society; while it permits individuals                     to exercise their wills within broad limits, it also burdens                     them with more responsibility for their own emotional well-being                     than humans ever bore before. The fewer the rules, the greater                     the need to make one&#8217;s own rules for the sake of self-preservation.                     Not only to make them, but to live by them &#8211; and it is always                     tougher to abide by self-imposed rules than by those imposed                     from above.<\/p>\n<p>Even finding out what rules to set in the first place is                     a disturbing problem. In a society which constantly pushes                     a variety of competing choices on a person and then says,                     &#8220;go ahead and do your own thing&#8221;, it is a real dilemma to                     determine what things to do and not to do for your own good.<\/p>\n<h3>Throwing out the babies with the bathwater of mistrust<\/h3>\n<p>To lead a fulfilling life amid such complexity obviously                     demands able judgment. But judgment is usually based on experience,                     and here many young people feel themselves to be on their                     own. They find it hard to tell what to assimilate from the                     experience of their elders and what to reject as hypocrisy                     in the defence of vested interests. The Watergate scandal                     was only the most striking of the many events that have led                     to a deep suspicion of the moral poses of the adult world.<\/p>\n<p>The young lately have seen a succession of virtuous fa\u00e7ades                     ripped away to reveal hidden injustice and corruption. Small                     wonder they are inclined to look upon the traditional values                     of the society with a cynical eye. Unfortunately, a lot of                     babies have been thrown out with the bathwater of their rejection                     of the old social doctrine. An automatic mistrust of everything                     to do with the &#8220;system&#8221; &#8211; including the moral and legal system                     which it embodies &#8211; has given rise to an odd form of narrow-mindedness                     which is supposedly open to new ideas but shut against old                     ones.<\/p>\n<p>Carried to its logical extreme, this becomes the blank conditioned                     reflex of Pavlov&#8217;s dogs, slavering at certain sounds and growling                     at others; or the mentality of Pavlov&#8217;s compatriot, the anarchist                     Mikhail Bakunin, who (according to Malcolm Muggeridge) once                     saw some men setting fire to a house and sprang from his carriage                     to assist them, never stopping to ask who they were or why                     they were burning down the house.<\/p>\n<p>Certainly the pressure is on from various quarters to narrow                     down the minds of young people, notably the commercial &#8220;hype&#8221;                     to the effect that if it isn&#8217;t happening now, it isn&#8217;t worth                     considering. This battle cry of the exploiters of the youth                     culture would cut young people off from all the experience                     of the past. The fast pace of the mass media also helps to                     spread the impression that anyone who is not &#8220;where it&#8217;s at&#8221;                     is a social pariah. It is the age of the latest: the latest                     pseudo-scientific theory, the latest revelations of the perfidy                     of the Establishment, the latest campus cult book, the latest                     punk rock group.<\/p>\n<h3>Why not let the self-professed thinkers do the thinking                     for you?<\/h3>\n<p>It all has a look of boldness and liberation about it that                     can be deceiving. The poet Stephen Spender recorded of a nearly                     identical period of modernism in Germany in the late 1920s                     that &#8220;intense expressions of will and feeling were obscured                     by the predominate fashionableness of advanced attitudes.                     It was easy to be advanced. You had only to take off your                     clothes.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Under the pressure to &#8220;get with it&#8221;, it is difficult for                     anyone to form and hold independent opinions. But why bother,                     anyway? How much more convenient it is to let the self-professed                     thinkers do the thinking for you. It disposes of the danger                     of being outmoded. Follow the leader, and know that you are                     following the latest trend.<\/p>\n<p>This feeling may account for why there now seems to be such                     uniformity in the attitudes of youth, at least in western                     countries. The danger is that uniformity can easily turn into                     the kind of intellectual conformity which limits the scope                     for people really to &#8220;do their own thing&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>It would be ironic if the conformity attacked so successfully                     by youth in the 1960s were only to be replaced by a new and                     even stricter conformity in the 1980s &#8211; ironic, but not funny.                     And it could well happen. George Orwell, a socialist thinker                     who could hardly be called a reactionary, once wrote:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;In a society in which there is no law, and in theory no                     compulsion, the only arbiter of behaviour is public opinion.                     But public opinion, because of the tremendous urge to conformity                     in gregarious animals, is less tolerant than any system of                     law. When human beings are governed by &#8216;thou shalt not&#8217; the                     individual can practise a certain amount of eccentricity:                     when they are governed by &#8216;love&#8217; and &#8216;reason&#8217;, he is under                     constant pressure to make him behave exactly the same as everybody                     else.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h3>The outward trappings of individualism should not be confused                     with the real thing<\/h3>\n<p>This may seem like nonsense at a time when people dress                     in countless different colourful ways, and when the opportunity                     for self-expression is broader than ever. But a certain sameness                     has also crept into the dress and language of the young; though                     they may look and talk differently from the preceding generation,                     they are not so diverse among themselves.<\/p>\n<p>In any case, nobody should mistake the outward trappings                     of individualism for the genuine article. True individualism                     is not something that shows externally. What really matters                     is not how people look, but how they think and act.<\/p>\n<p>And what matters to the future of a generation &#8211; matters                     very seriously indeed &#8211; is whether individual members of it                     are able to think and act in any significantly different way                     from all the others. Why? Because people who move about in                     herds are susceptible to domination by power-obsessed leaders                     who see in a soft mass mentality a good place to impose their                     hard wills.<\/p>\n<p>When the power-grabbers secure their grip, the only hope                     of shaking loose is through a determination not to surrender                     control of one&#8217;s own thinking. Albert Einstein, who knew first-hand                     the enormities which a controlled mass mentality can bring,                     wrote: &#8220;While it is true that an inherently free and scrupulous                     person may be destroyed, such an individual can never be enslaved                     or used as a blind tool.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The condition of the world will never be improved by conformists.                     By definition, conformists are intolerant and even afraid                     of new and different ideas. Progress is the product of the                     working of strong minds &#8211; minds kept fit by mental exercise.                     Minds that are closed to the opinions of others lack the stimulation                     and nourishment needed to make them grow strong.<\/p>\n<p>On a more personal scale, a herd offers no place for a sensitive                     and intelligent person. Twenty-five hundred years of human                     experience, from the ancient Greek philosophers on, tell us                     that in order to find happiness, people must first find themselves.                     Finding yourself naturally leads on to <em>being <\/em>yourself                     &#8211; which means coming to terms with your own circumstances                     according to your own standards of behaviour. It is a delusion                     to think that happiness can be mass-produced. One can never                     find it by following a crowd.<\/p>\n<h3>A person&#8217;s identity is only complete when it is rounded                     out by loved ones and friends<\/h3>\n<p>Since most of us live in crowds, however, we are faced with                     the further problem of having to establish our distinctive                     identities within an existing social framework. People who                     insist on doing precisely what they want with no self-discipline                     and no regard to the impact of their actions on those around                     them are likely to end up in jail, where individualism is                     not encouraged at all. In his immortal work <em>On Liberty<\/em>,                     John Stuart Mill struck the balance between the individual                     and society quite neatly. &#8220;The liberty of the individual must                     be thus far limited; that he must not make a nuisance of himself                     to other people,&#8221; he wrote.<\/p>\n<p>Individualism, then, is not anti-social; rather the opposite.                     A person&#8217;s identity is not his alone; it is only complete                     when it is rounded out by loved ones and friends. Individualism                     is strength, so a true individualist is strong enough to tolerate                     the habits and opinions of people who differ from him. A true                     individualist respects the individuality of everyone else.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This is my way; what is your way? <em>The <\/em>way doesn&#8217;t                     exist,&#8221; wrote the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche. In this                     perplexing world, finding one&#8217;s own way and then sticking                     to it is something that comes naturally only to a lucky few.                     Most of us lose our way from time to time, straying down the                     wrong streets and going up blind alleys. It is all very exhausting.                     It would be much less trouble to take directions from those                     who assure us they know <em>the <\/em>way. But wait! &#8220;Most                     of the greatest evils that man has inflicted upon man have                     come through people feeling quite certain about something                     which, in fact, was false,&#8221; Bertrand Russell tells us. Quite                     certainly, what he says is true.<\/p>\n<h3>In between the true and false, watch out for the half-truth<\/h3>\n<p>Sorting out the true from the false is an extremely demanding                     endeavour. It is even more demanding to identify the half-truths                     that are the meat of modern politicians and pressure groups.                     It takes an equipage of knowledge to search for the truth;                     moreover, it takes a recognition of what knowledge is lacking                     and a willingness to acquire it. And that, in turn, takes                     humility, for perhaps the greatest victory a person can win                     over his own ego is to know what he does not know.<\/p>\n<p>One advantage of being young today, however, is that the                     chance to learn has never been better. Never has there been                     such ready access to the accumulated wisdom of the world through                     instruction, the mass media and books. Never have there been                     so many people willing to help others find their way, either.                     Apart from the usual parental guidance &#8211; which sadly is not                     available to all young people &#8211; numerous organizations exist                     to provide counsel and comfort to those seeking advice or                     those who have stumbled into distress.<\/p>\n<h3>Claptrap is claptrap, whether it comes from the right or                     left<\/h3>\n<p>Yet in the end, all the learning and advice that one can                     get amounts only to the raw material to form one&#8217;s own opinions                     and patterns of behaviour. In the permissive society, &#8220;you                     pays your money and you takes your choice&#8221;, as the English                     used to say. The choices to be made by young people nowadays                     are peculiarly hazardous. There are simply many more ways                     to blunder into trouble than at any time before.<\/p>\n<p>All the more reason, therefore, for the young to insist                     on asserting their own individuality and not to be herded                     into going for whatever is &#8220;trendy&#8221;. This applies not only                     to behaviour, but just as importantly to ideas. As a political                     force of tomorrow, youth is being subjected today to a good                     deal of ideological mind-bending. Young people should treat                     all they are told with scepticism. Claptrap is claptrap, whether                     it comes from the right or the left.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;While to the claims of charity a man may yield and yet                     be free, to the claims of conformity no man may yield and                     be free at all,&#8221; Oscar Wilde wrote. A new strain of conformity                     is now attempting to make claims on the minds of the young.                     It is an insidious strain, because it goes under the guise                     of an illusory individualism. But it is every bit as narrow-minded                     as any conformity before it, and if young people give in to                     it, they may forfeit their richest legacy &#8211; the right to be                     themselves.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":79,"featured_media":0,"template":"","categories":[1],"rbc_letter_theme":[],"rbc_letter_year":[58],"class_list":["post-3647","rbc_letter","type-rbc_letter","status-publish","hentry","category-uncategorized","rbc_letter_year-58"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.5 (Yoast SEO v27.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Vol. 59, No. 4 - April 1978 - &#039;Doing Your Own Thing&#039; - RBC<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-59-no-4-april-1978-doing-your-own-thing\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Vol. 59, No. 4 - April 1978 - &#039;Doing Your Own Thing&#039; - RBC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a curious way, the permissive society has placed more responsibility on young people than ever. And a new kind of conformity threatens to take the place of the old. Can the young really &#8220;do their own thing&#8221; in these conditions? We look at the problems of being yourself today&#8230; &#8220;To be nobody-but-myself &#8211; in [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-59-no-4-april-1978-doing-your-own-thing\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"RBC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-11-28T00:06:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rbc.com\\\/en\\\/about-us\\\/history\\\/letter\\\/vol-59-no-4-april-1978-doing-your-own-thing\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rbc.com\\\/en\\\/about-us\\\/history\\\/letter\\\/vol-59-no-4-april-1978-doing-your-own-thing\\\/\",\"name\":\"Vol. 59, No. 4 - April 1978 - 'Doing Your Own Thing' - RBC\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rbc.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1978-04-01T01:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-11-28T00:06:22+00:00\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rbc.com\\\/en\\\/about-us\\\/history\\\/letter\\\/vol-59-no-4-april-1978-doing-your-own-thing\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rbc.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rbc.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"RBC\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rbc.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Vol. 59, No. 4 - April 1978 - 'Doing Your Own Thing' - RBC","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-59-no-4-april-1978-doing-your-own-thing\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Vol. 59, No. 4 - April 1978 - 'Doing Your Own Thing' - RBC","og_description":"In a curious way, the permissive society has placed more responsibility on young people than ever. And a new kind of conformity threatens to take the place of the old. Can the young really &#8220;do their own thing&#8221; in these conditions? We look at the problems of being yourself today&#8230; &#8220;To be nobody-but-myself &#8211; in [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-59-no-4-april-1978-doing-your-own-thing\/","og_site_name":"RBC","article_modified_time":"2022-11-28T00:06:22+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-59-no-4-april-1978-doing-your-own-thing\/","url":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-59-no-4-april-1978-doing-your-own-thing\/","name":"Vol. 59, No. 4 - April 1978 - 'Doing Your Own Thing' - RBC","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"1978-04-01T01:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2022-11-28T00:06:22+00:00","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-59-no-4-april-1978-doing-your-own-thing\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/","name":"RBC","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"parsely":{"version":"1.1.0","canonical_url":"https:\/\/rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-59-no-4-april-1978-doing-your-own-thing\/","smart_links":{"inbound":0,"outbound":0},"traffic_boost_suggestions_count":0,"meta":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"Vol. 59, No. 4 &#8211; April 1978 &#8211; &#8216;Doing Your Own Thing&#8217;","url":"http:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-59-no-4-april-1978-doing-your-own-thing\/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/about-us\/history\/letter\/vol-59-no-4-april-1978-doing-your-own-thing\/"},"thumbnailUrl":"","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":""},"articleSection":"Uncategorized","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"amandeepsingh"}],"creator":["amandeepsingh"],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"RBC","logo":""},"keywords":[],"dateCreated":"1978-04-01T01:00:00Z","datePublished":"1978-04-01T01:00:00Z","dateModified":"2022-11-28T00:06:22Z"},"rendered":"<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"wp-parsely-metadata\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@type\":\"NewsArticle\",\"headline\":\"Vol. 59, No. 4 &#8211; April 1978 &#8211; &#8216;Doing Your Own Thing&#8217;\",\"url\":\"http:\\\/\\\/www.rbc.com\\\/en\\\/about-us\\\/history\\\/letter\\\/vol-59-no-4-april-1978-doing-your-own-thing\\\/\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/www.rbc.com\\\/en\\\/about-us\\\/history\\\/letter\\\/vol-59-no-4-april-1978-doing-your-own-thing\\\/\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"url\":\"\"},\"articleSection\":\"Uncategorized\",\"author\":[{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"name\":\"amandeepsingh\"}],\"creator\":[\"amandeepsingh\"],\"publisher\":{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"name\":\"RBC\",\"logo\":\"\"},\"keywords\":[],\"dateCreated\":\"1978-04-01T01:00:00Z\",\"datePublished\":\"1978-04-01T01:00:00Z\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-11-28T00:06:22Z\"}<\/script>","tracker_url":"https:\/\/cdn.parsely.com\/keys\/rbc.com\/p.js"},"featured_img":false,"coauthors":[],"author_meta":{"author_link":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/author\/amandeepsingh\/","display_name":"amandeepsingh"},"relative_dates":{"created":"Posted 48 years ago","modified":"Updated 4 years ago"},"absolute_dates":{"created":"Posted on April 1, 1978","modified":"Updated on November 28, 2022"},"absolute_dates_time":{"created":"Posted on April 1, 1978 1:00 am","modified":"Updated on November 28, 2022 12:06 am"},"featured_img_caption":"","tax_additional":{"category":{"linked":["<a href=\"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/category\/uncategorized\/\" class=\"advgb-post-tax-term\">Uncategorized<\/a>"],"unlinked":["<span class=\"advgb-post-tax-term\">Uncategorized<\/span>"],"slug":"category","name":"Categories"},"rbc_letter_theme":{"linked":[],"unlinked":[],"slug":"rbc_letter_theme","name":"Themes"},"rbc_letter_year":{"linked":["<a href=\"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/year\/1978\/\" class=\"advgb-post-tax-term\">1978<\/a>"],"unlinked":["<span class=\"advgb-post-tax-term\">1978<\/span>"],"slug":"rbc_letter_year","name":"Years"}},"series_order":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/rbc_letter\/3647","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/rbc_letter"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/rbc_letter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/79"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/rbc_letter\/3647\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3647"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3647"},{"taxonomy":"rbc_letter_theme","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/rbc_letter_theme?post=3647"},{"taxonomy":"rbc_letter_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rbc.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/rbc_letter_year?post=3647"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}