June 1949 Vol. 30, No. 6
Canada Is A World
Customer
Download PDF
version
Canada holds a unique place in
world economy - at least in that part of it which remains
independent and free.
She derives between 25 and 30 per cent of her national income
from her merchandise export trade.
For this reason there is a great deal of talk about exports.
Every producer wants to ship some of his goods abroad, and
that seems the most important thing in the world.
The objective of this Monthly Letter is to turn the other
side of the penny, and to show that it is the same penny.
We are closely concerned with the purchasing power of other
countries, and that purchasing power depends upon what goods
other countries can sell.
Canada is far from being selfsufficient. To keep up
our standard of living we must import certain goods we cannot
produce, or cannot make economically. One of our main purposes,
indeed, in using our own specialized resources to their full
is to enable us to bring in the things we are lacking.
Importance of the import business has been recognized by
government agencies. The Import Division of the Foreign Trade
Service, Department of Trade and Commerce, has been set up
to give information regarding production, supply, and price
conditions in foreign markets, advice on Import requirements,
and all matters connected with purchase of goods abroad for
sale here. Trade commissioners are ready to give information
about their territories. They will recommend to intending
Canadian importers the names of responsible supply houses,
manufacturers and agents. They advise importers as to the
best methods of approach to foreign suppliers. When importers
go abroad to make purchases, the trade commissioners will
introduce them to supply houses and agents, put them in touch
with interpreters, and assist them in every way possible.
The Canadian International Trade Fair has shown for the
second year that organized activity for the encouragement
of imports is prominent in Canadian minds. Fullest facilities
are provided for foreign producers to show Canadian buyers
a full range of everything likely to find customers here.
It may be said that Canadian banks which maintain foreign
branches and agencies are following a healthy plan of assisting
importers. They gather trade and credit information, suggest
itineraries for importers who wish to travel in search of
goods, supply letters of introduction, provide lists of firms
which are likely to have the goods sought by the importer,
and distribute trade information. Some, like this bank with
its 61 foreign branches, supplemented by correspondent banks
in every part of the world, have a department organized to
provide information gathered from the best sources as a matter
of routine or by special request.
An Ancient Custom
Trading between peoples of different nations is not a new
thing. Nature has so distributed her bounties of soil, forest,
mines, waterflow, fisheries and other resources that every
nation can produce some things more easily and cheaply than
any other nation. Years of practice have enabled certain nations
to develop special skills in manufacture. Men and nations
tend to produce the commodities for which they are specially
fitted by nature or training.
It follows that every country needs some things which are
produced better or more cheaply elsewhere. The supply of corn
was the great problem for ancient Athenian statesmen; salt
became an early element in international trade in Europe.
Sir Leonard Woolley, who was director of an expedition which
excavated Ur of the Chaldees, found a bill of lading dated
2048 B.C., for a vessel which had been away on a voyage of
two years and returned to its quay at Ur to discharge a cargo
of gold, copper ore, valuable hardwoods, fine stones for statues
and vases, ivory, and so on.
Four thousand years later our wants have expanded as rapidly
as have the facilities for satisfying them.
Countries that were once remote are now neighbours. Many
countries, including Canada, have become accustomed to a state
of prosperity and material comfort they would be reluctant
to give up. This demands a greater exchange of goods than
ever before, if happiness, satisfaction and peace are to be
achieved.
But, as Professor Lorne T. Morgan, of the University of
Toronto, commented in reviewing Dr. Orville J. McDiarmid's
book Commercial Policy in the Canadian Economy: "While
economic sanity is a necessity to the wellbeing of the
postwar world, the mere necessity of it by no means
guarantees its appearance."
Common Sense Trade
A common sense formula on trade runs something like this:
The stuff we produce as a nation, plus the stuff we import,
less the stuff we export, is a measure of our standard of
living.
Exports are important principally as a means of obtaining
imports. This lesson is being widely taught in the United
States. Government officials, newspapers, business people,
and trade associations have joined in what might almost be
called a crusade to convince Congress and the people that
a continuation of the current prosperity is based upon a widening
of the trading policy of that country. Leaders of thought
recognize that the present unbalanced state of the country's
foreign trade cannot persist indefinitely, and that the most
favourable thing that could happen to the United States would
be a rise in imports. The Department of Commerce has set up
a division, like the import section of Canada's Department
of Trade and Commerce, to help importers by providing information.
One of the first lessons to learn about foreign trade is
that no one outside is compelled to buy Canada's goods, and
that we cannot force 400 million bushels of wheat and 700
million pounds of bacon and ham down the throats of our 13
million people at home.
The next lesson is that two elementary principles of internal
retail trade apply also to foreign trade: to sell a man anything
you must first learn what he wants and then be able to convince
him that you can supply it at a reasonable price.
The third is what interests us principally in this article:
if you wish to sell to a man or a nation you must buy from
that man or nation or otherwise help in making purchasing
power available to him. That is an economic axiom. If business
and labour and agriculture neglect to encourage imports from
abroad they cannot fail to witness a serious decline in exports
and therefore in their earning power.
As to the effect within a country of its foreign trade,
consider the movie industry in the United States. Great Britain
found itself short of dollars, and imposed restrictions on
importation of United States films. This spring, film producers
looked into the state of their finances and imposed the greatest
economy measures ever known to Hollywood. Why? Because, big
and all as the United States market is for films, nine out
of every ten Hollywood pictures cannot show a profit on exhibits
in the United States alone, and have to depend on foreign
business to cover expenses and pay dividends.
Balance of Trade
The ideal situation would probably be a world pool of consumable
goods with all nations contributing to it to the fullest extent
of their capacity and all free to draw from it according to
the value of their contribution.
This is, so far, a Utopian's dream rather than an economist's
hope, but there is no reason why more attention should not
be paid to certain features of it.
Competition between firms for larger shares of existing
markets is a healthy situation contributing to lower prices,
better quality and superior service. But competition of one
country to sell more abroad than it buys abroad is irrational
and fallacious.
In talking about foreign trade, use of the word "surplus"
is unfortunate. It leaves the impression, too widely held,
that foreign trade consists in getting rid of goods we do
not want for our own use. That is putting the cart before
the horse. It implies that foreign trade is a device to get
rid of a surplus product, whereas the socalled "surplus"
was brought into existence because of the demand created by
foreign trade.
If we disregard the fact that international trade is the
exchange of stuff for stuff we enter the realm of the occult.
There's no such place as one where we can sell everything,
buy nothing, and continue to live, but some people otherwise
certified as sane continue to strive for it.
Foreign trade, if it means anything, means something that
is of mutual benefit. All history testifies to the fact that
standards of living have risen as goods and services have
been exchanged among neighbours.
Foreign trade is not something in which one indulges; one
must participate, and we do not yet know of any limit to the
benefits which human beings may bestow upon one another by
the exchange of the products of the highest exertion of their
diligence and skill. The basis of it was put into one of his
plays in 425 B.C. by Aristophanes: Think of something of your
country's produce that's plentiful down there and scarce up
here, and let's exchange.
The natural unit of economic activity used to be the family
of the caveman; today it is not even a city or a state
but the entire living generation of mankind. World trade last
year totalled $51 billion, the total exports of all countries,
of which Canada's share was $3,075 million.
Economic Freedom
Reasonable people believe that human energies can best be
directed toward the improvement of standards of living by
building a world in which there is the greatest possible measure
of economic freedom. This was the objective of the proposals
agreed upon at Bretton Woods for an international monetary
fund and bank for reconstruction and development. It was the
purpose of the Benelux countries - Belgium, Netherlands and
Luxembourg - when they agreed to scrap all trade barriers
between them. It prompted Switzerland and the Benelux countries
to sign an agreement for mutual reduction of customs charges,
and France and Italy to agree to form a customs union, and
the Eastern and Western European nations to seek a revival
of trade between the two areas.
Canada has been one of the chief supporters of efforts to
promote multilateral trade, which means free international
trade carried on by the unregimented activities of private
enterprise.
Active support has been given the various organizations
in the commercial field sponsored by the United Nations. Canada
was host to the first session of the Food and Agricultural
Organization. We participated in the formulation of the Bretton
Woods Agreement. Canada is a member of the International Monetary
Fund. She was one of the "big three" in the deliberations
at Geneva and Havana that resulted respectively in the General
Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and the Charter of the International
Trade Organization.
All of this is in keeping with the spreading feeling that
international trade must be multilateral if mankind is to
take intelligent advantage of the opportunities before the
world to live a better and happier life.
We cannot achieve permanent stability, let alone improvement,
if we try to make the basis of recovery the division of the
world into watertight compartments. That kind of world would
contain a number of closed economies, each conducting its
foreign trade under strict governmental control in accordance
with shortterm agreements based on planned barter with
politically selected countries.
ITO Charter is Practical
The Charter for the International Trade Organization (ITO),
tentatively approved about a year ago by the United Nations
Conference on Trade and Employment, represents the most ambitious
of the many international economic agreements concluded in
the last few years.
The Charter is not a headintheclouds dream.
It provides a set of standards which will achieve the greatest
possible benefits from trade in a world of widely differing
economic and political systems, and it provides the mechanism
for consultation on common problems of commercial policy.
It seeks to substitute negotiation and debate for economic
warfare.
More than twothirds of the world's two billion people
live in countries which consider that they are underdeveloped
relative to the industrialized nations of Western Europe and
North America. It is part of the ITO function to assist in
sound development of economic and industrial resources in
these countries.
The Canadian Market
Canada offers a great market to many foreign exporters,
but, warned the Board of Trade Journal in an article
addressed to British manufacturers, it is a hard and competitive
market. First and foremost, says the article, is the need
to induce Canadians to buy by taking pains to show them that
Britain can offer what they want. The United Kingdom Engineering
Mission to Canada last winter found everywhere that the Canadian
buyer, "subject always to acceptable price, delivery and service,
is more than ready to buy British."
The market is a big one. Consumers' expenditures are now
greater than at any other time in Canada's history. Personal
expenditure on consumer goods and services climbed from $3,770
million in 1938 to $10,000 million in 1948. Labour income
rose from $2,054 million in 1938 to $7,130 million in 1948.
In keeping with these increases, our purchases abroad went
up spectacularly, from $678 million in 1938 to $2,637 million
in 1948. This table, from the magazine Foreign Trade, published
by the Department of Trade and Commerce, shows in percentages
the distribution of these purchases:
Percentage Distribution of Canadian Imports:
| Commonwealth Countries |
1938 |
1948 |
| United Kingdom and Europe |
17.6 |
11.4 |
| America |
3.3 |
2.0 |
| Africa |
0.7 |
1.0 |
| Asia |
3.5 |
2.9 |
| Oceania |
2.4 |
1.8 |
| Total Commonwealth Countries |
27.5 |
19.1 |
| Foreign Countries |
|
|
| United States and Possessions |
62.7 |
68.6 |
| Latin America |
2.4 |
8.4 |
| Europe |
5.9 |
2.7 |
| Other Foreign |
1.5 |
1.2 |
| Total Foreign Countries |
72.5 |
80.9 |
Newfoundland, which joined Canada in confederation this
spring, is not included in these figures. That country provides
a market for food, clothing, radios, machinery, automobiles,
and a wide range of commodities. More than 50 per cent of
Newfoundland's $105 million of imports in 194748 went
from Canada, while 38 per cent originated in the United States.
Imports from Britain
We brought in $299 million worth of goods from the United
Kingdom last year, an increase of $110 million over the preceding
year, and $180 million more than in 1938.
There is widespread recognition here of Britain's economic
difficulties, and a growing realization of the degree to which
her economic recovery is bound up with Canada's own economic
future.
In seeking to extend sales in Canada, British manufacturers
are sending representatives to scan the market and provide
them with information about what Canadians want in the way
of styling, quality, and performance. It has been proposed
that members in an industry should club together in these
factfinding missions and should be helped by the government.
This is a new and imaginauve proposal, the success of which
is foreshadowed by the good results of the engineering mission
and the recent mission of the Wholesale Clothing Manufacturers
Federation of Great Britain.
There has been some criticism here of the reduction of British
purchases of our farm and forest products. An article by E.
H. Gilpin in the Board of Trade Journal points out
that "as things are in the world, the only way we can pay
Canada is by goods and services, and the possibility of an
increased volume of our purchases from her inexorably depends
upon the increase of her purchases from us."
The British are hopeful of improvement. They call their
effort "Operation Canada", and they are organizing meetings
throughout the United Kingdom to advise industrial centres
of the opportunities here and the needs of the Canadian market.
As the leader of the Engineering Mission said: "We came out
as a Mission to Canada. We go back as a Mission to Britain."
Imports from the U.S.A.
Canada's imports from the United States totalled $1,806
million in 1948, compared with $425 million ten years previously.
This growth is the result of a combination of factors. An
article in Canada Year Book for 1947 remarked: "From
the 1920's on, Canadian preference for United States manufactured
consumer goods, or for domestic goods on the United States
pattern, has been steadily growing. This growing preference
is not unnatural, in view of the increasing growth of United
States branch plants in Canada and the exposure of Canadians
to United States radio, magazine and national advertising
campaigns."
A lesson recently brought to attention in United States
publications has validity also in Canada. It is pointed out
that while it may be possible that the United States can get
along with exporting only 10 per cent of its national production,
because of its relative selfsufficiency in resources
and its high manufacturing potential, and, therefore, its
small need to import, this is not a whole view. Many individual
industries depend upon exports for their prosperity: aircraft,
cotton, and tobacco to the extent of over 30 per cent. If
exports in these industries were to be reduced to 10 per cent,
they would be badly depressed.
This is being realized so extensively that exporting firms
are organizing drives to encourage importing, thus paralleling
the efforts being made through government and world organizations
to bring about a healthy exchange of commodities.
The Dollar Shortage
Here then, are the three sides of the triangle: Canada,
Great Britain and the United States. Canadian trade with the
United Kingdom and the United States used to be of a complementary
nature, and was a classic example of the working of a basically
sound international division of labour. While Canadian cereals
fed Britain, British textiles clothed Canadians; while Canadian
products of forest and mine, processed by hydroelectric
power, fed the industries of the United States, the coal and
iron products of the United States equipped Canadian factories.
The triangle gives Canada a foot in both the sterling and
dollar worlds, and she is loath to abandon either interest.
We depended upon our sales to Britain to provide us with enough
dollars to pay for our purchases in the United States. Until
the recent war, in fact, we went along quite happily, scarcely
aware of the deficit we had with the United States.
Today, however, there is a worldwide shortage of dollars,
and other countries are unwilling to use with us any of their
limited supplies. It becomes necessary, as was pointed out
in an article in Saturday Night, to accept payment
for our goods in the form of goods - "not to the extent of
exactly balancing our trade with each country, but at least
so that our purchases from countries other than the United
States will roughly offset our sales to those countries as
a group."
A crisis arose when our reserves of gold and United States
dollars fell from $1,508 million (U.S.) in 1945 through $1,245
million in 1946 to $502 million in late 1947. By economic
selfdiscipline in the form of prohibited imports, rationed
imports, and restrictions of various kinds, Canada has recovered
to the point where reserves totalled $998 million on December
31, 1948, and $1,065 million in March this year.
The shortterm problem has been met. The ideal longterm
cure is restoration of convertibility between sterling and
dollars. Meantime it was urged by the Governor of the Bank
of Canada in an address at Vancouver in March: "All of us,
to the full extent of our power, should guard against the
mentality of restriction and contraction, and should seek
that greater wealth and greater development which come from
enterprises and expansion." One responsibility, he said, is
to see that imports from nondollar countries are encouraged
as much as it is possible to do so.
Progress Has Been Made
It is evident that in an imperfect world there are inevitable
conflicts between the aims of individuals and nations, and
the task of rebuilding a stable world order appears to be
impossibly difficult. The obstacles, however, should not be
allowed to obscure the progress that has already been made
as the result of persistent effort.
One thing needed in every country is to brush aside popular
prejudice which blames all the ills of the country on the
unpredictable vagaries of strange people in other parts of
the world.
This was put neatly by A.G.B. Fisher in his booklet Economic
SelfSufficiency, in which he likened such critics
to a small child, firmly convinced that, if only everybody
else would do exactly what he wanted, the universe would move
forward smoothly to its predestined end, the satisfaction
of his desires. Tension and unpleasantness arise when he discovers
that the world is not made his way.
We cannot rest content that the other countries in the world
will come our way. It may be necessary for Canadian importers,
so often the forgotten men in our economy, to go out looking
more earnestly than ever before for goods which can command
a market in Canada. It would be a great contribution to Canada's
stability.
Published by RBC Financial Group. All editions from the RBC
Letter collection are available on our web site at www.rbc.com/responsibility/letter.
Our e-mail address is: rbcletter@rbc.com.
Publié aussi en francais.
[ Return to RBC Letter
home page ]
|