RBC Financial Group
RBC Home | Search | Site Map | Contact Us | Legal Terms | Français  
Other RBC Sites:
Banking Investments Insurance Capital Markets
» Corporate Profile
» Corporate Governance
» History
» Investor Relations
» Media Newsroom
» Economics
» Publications
» Corporate Responsibility
» Careers
» Donations
» Sponsorships
» The Environment
» Become a Vendor
» Become an Employee
Make a Complaint
 Making a Complaint
 Office of the Ombudsman
  Helping Clients Make Informed Decisions
  Case Studies
  Annual Report

Case Studies

 

Write Off Extends Bad Credit Record

The Problem

Case study:
 
What can be learned: the expert's advice
 

From the Client's Perspective

A client whose debt had been written off by the Bank several years ago was upset to discover the debt was still reflected on her credit bureau report. Expecting this information to have been cleared from her report long ago, the client asked the Bank to correct her credit record. When the Bank insisted the information was correct, the client appealed to the Office of the Ombudsman.

From RBC's Perspective

The Bank had determined it was unlikely to recover the full amount of the client's debt. The bank's loss of income -- or writeoff -- was reported in that accounting period. Banks are required to update loan records -- including write offs -- at consumer rating agencies. This information remains on the debtor's record for six or seven years, or, in the event of a writeoff, possibly longer if the Bank seeks legal judgment against the client for non-payment.

The Resolution

An investigation revealed that the client's interpretation of the term writeoff differed from the Bank's practice. When the debt was written off, the client believed this to mean that the Bank would no longer pursue her for payment, that the debt no longer existed and that the bad credit rating would be cancelled. In fact, as the client learned, and accepted after several conversations with the Ombudsman, the length of time for the credit record began, not ended, with the writeoff.


What can be learned: the expert's advice

Conflicts are most satisfactorily resolved when they are handled quickly and at the source. In circumstances comparable to this case, what might the parties do to prevent the problem from escalating?

For RBC Financial Group:
Ensure clients understand that the Bank is required to report to credit bureaus all debts left unpaid, partially paid or settled in full after being written off. Other than correcting a reporting error or adding a note to indicate the debt was settled, the Bank cannot alter a client's credit record.

For the client:
Make sure you understand or ask about the consequences of overdue or unpaid loans. Review your credit record to ensure it accurately reflects your credit repayment history.

Please note: The above case study was chosen because of the significance of the learning derived from it. It is not an attempt to duplicate the demographics of the case by issue, outcome, RBC Financial Group or any other factors.

Photograph does not depict actual customer.


 

Take Action
  Report a fraudulent email or other security concern
  Make a Complaint
11/22/2007 07:37:18